scholarly journals Usefulness of diffusion derived vessel density computed from a simplified IVIM imaging protocol: An experimental study with rat biliary duct blockage induced liver fibrosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 115-123
Author(s):  
Gen-Wen Hu ◽  
Cun-Jing Zheng ◽  
Wei-Xiang Zhong ◽  
Dan-Ping Zhuang ◽  
Ben-Heng Xiao ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (3) ◽  
pp. 712-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Xiang J. Wang ◽  
Jing Yuan ◽  
Eagle S. H. Chu ◽  
Minnie Y. Y. Go ◽  
Hua Huang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 911-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandru Mester ◽  
Lidia Ciobanu ◽  
Marian Taulescu ◽  
Dragos Apostu ◽  
Ondine Lucaciu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 544-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neveen A. Salem ◽  
Hanaa H. Ahmed ◽  
Hadeer A. Aglan ◽  
Shaimaa A. ElShebiney

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neda Milosavljevic ◽  
Marina Gazdic ◽  
Bojana Simovic Markovic ◽  
Aleksandar Arsenijevic ◽  
Jasmin Nurkovic ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben-Heng Xiao ◽  
Hua Huang ◽  
Li-Fei Wang ◽  
Shi-Wen Qiu ◽  
Sheng-Wen Guo ◽  
...  

Liver vessel density can be evaluated by an imaging biomarker diffusion-derived vessel density (DDVD): DDVD/area(b0b2) = Sb0/ROIarea0 – Sb2/ROIarea2, where Sb0 and Sb2 refer to the liver signal when b is 0 or 2 (s/mm2); ROIarea0 and ROIarea2 refer to the region of interest (ROI) on b = 0 or 2 images; and Sb2 may be replaced by Sb15 ( b = 15). This concept was validated in this study. Liver diffusion images were acquired at 1.5 T. For a scan-rescan repeatability study of six subjects, b values of 0 and 2 were used. The validation study was composed of 26 healthy volunteers and 19 consecutive suspected chronic viral hepatitis B patients, and diffusion images with b values of 0, 2, 15, 20, 30, 45, 50, 60, 80, 100, 200, 300, 600, and 800 were acquired. Four patients did not have liver fibrosis, and the rest were four stage 1, three stage 2, four stage 3, and one stage 4 patients, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for repeatability was 0.994 for DDVD/area(Sb0Sb2) and 0.978 for DDVD/area(Sb0Sb15). In the validation study, DDVD/area(Sb0Sb2) and area(Sb0Sb15) were 14.80 ± 3.06 and 26.58 ± 3.97 for healthy volunteers, 10.51 ± 1.51 and 20.15 ± 2.21 for stage 1–2 fibrosis patients, and 9.42 ± 0.87 and 19.42 ± 1.89 for stage 3–4 fibrosis patients. For 16 patients where IVIM analysis was performed, a combination of DDVD/area, PF, and Dfast achieved the best differentiation for nonfibrotic livers and fibrotic livers. DDVD/area were weakly correlated with PF or Dfast. Both DDVD/area(Sb0Sb2) and area(Sb0Sb15) are useful imaging biomarkers to separate fibrotic and nonfibrotic livers, with fibrotic livers having lower measurements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Daniel R Pomaro ◽  
Francisco AH Fonseca ◽  
Anita LR Saldanha ◽  
Valeria P Lanzoni ◽  
Dulce E Casarini ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-193
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Napolitano ◽  
Xavier Rodríguez Bertola ◽  
Gabriela M. Sambuelli ◽  
Luis H. Vial ◽  
Daniel A. Torrecillas

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben-Heng Xiao ◽  
Hua Huang ◽  
Li-Fei Wang ◽  
Shi-Wen Qiu ◽  
Sheng-Wen Guo ◽  
...  

AbstractAimLiver vessel density can be evaluated by an imaging biomarker DDVD (diffusion derived vessel density): DDVD/area(b0b2) = Sb0/ROIarea0 – Sb2/ROIarea2, where Sb0 and Sb2 refer to the liver signal when b is 0 or 2 (s/mm2); ROIarea0 and ROIarea2 refer to the region-of-interest on b= 0 or 2 images; and Sb2 may be replaced by Sb15 (b=15). This concept was validated in this study.Materials and MethodsLiver diffusion images were acquired at 1.5T. For a scan-rescan repeatability study of 6 subjects, b-values of 0 and 2 were used. The validation study composed of 26 healthy volunteers and 19 consecutive suspected chronic viral hepatitis-b patients, and diffusion images with 16 b-values of 0, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, 46, 60, 72, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600 were acquired. Four patients did not have liver fibrosis, and the rest were four stage-1, three stage-2, four stage 3, and one stage-4 patients respectively.ResultsIntraclass correlation coefficient for repeatability was 0.994 for DDVD/area(Sb0Sb2), and 0.978 for DDVD/area(Sb0Sb15). In the validation study, DDVD/area(Sb0Sb2) and area(Sb0Sb15) were 14.80±3.06 and 26.58±3.97 for healthy volunteers, 10.51±1.51 and 20.15±2.21 for stage 1-2 fibrosis patients, and 9.42±0.87 and 19.42±1.89 for stage 3-4 fibrosis patients. For 16 patients where IVIM analysis was performed, a combination of DDVD/area, PF, and Dfast achieved the best differentiation for non-fibrotic livers and fibrotic livers. DDVD/area were weakly correlated with PF or Dfast.ConclusionBoth DDVD/area(Sb0Sb2) and area(Sb0Sb15) are useful imaging biomarker to separate fibrotic and non-fibrotic livers, with fibrotic livers had lower measurements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document