Infection Incidence and Management in Multiple Sclerosis Patients After Initiating Disease-Modifying Therapy

Author(s):  
Elizabeth C.S. Swart ◽  
Douglas Mager ◽  
Natasha Parekh ◽  
Rock A. Heyman ◽  
Rochelle Henderson ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 205521731769611 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Nicholas ◽  
JJ Ko ◽  
Y Park ◽  
P Navaratnam ◽  
HS Friedman ◽  
...  

Background Availability of oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may affect injectable DMT (iDMT) treatment patterns. Objective The objective of this paper is to evaluate iDMT persistency, reasons for persistency lapses, and outcomes among newly diagnosed RRMS patients. Methods Medical records of 300 RRMS patients initiated on iDMT between 2008 and 2013 were abstracted from 18 US-based neurology clinics. Eligible patients had ≥3 visits: pre-iDMT initiation, iDMT initiation (index), and ≥1 visit within 24 months post-index. MS-related symptoms, relapses, iDMT treatment patterns (i.e. persistency, discontinuation, switching, and restart), and reasons for non-persistency were tracked for 24 months. Results At 24 months, iDMT persistency was 61.0%; 28.0% of patients switched to another DMT, 8.0% discontinued, and 3.0% stopped and restarted the same iDMT. The most commonly identified reasons for non-persistency were perceived lack of efficacy (22.2%), adverse events (18.8%), and fear of needles/self-injecting (9.4%). At 24 months, 38.0% of patients had experienced a relapse and 11.0% had changes in MRI lesion counts. Patients without MS-related symptoms at index reported increases in the incidence of these symptoms at 24 months. Conclusions Non-persistency with iDMT remains an issue in the oral DMT age. Many patients still experienced relapses and disease progression, and should consider switching to more effective therapies.


Author(s):  
Farhan Chaudhry ◽  
Helena Bulka ◽  
Anirudha S. Rathnam ◽  
Omar M Said ◽  
Jia Lin ◽  
...  

AbstractImportanceMultiple sclerosis patients have been considered a higher-risk population for COVID-19 due to the high prevalence of disability and disease-modifying therapy use; however, no study has identified clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis, including staging, degree of disability, and disease-modifying therapy use that are associated with worse outcomes from COVID-19.DesignProspective cohort study looking at the outcomes of multiple sclerosis patients with COVID-19 between March 1st and May 18th 2020.SettingThis is a multicenter study of three distinct hospital systems within the U.S.ParticipantsThe study included 40 consecutive patients with nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection.ExposuresMultiple sclerosis staging, severe disability (based on baseline-extended disability status scale equal to or greater than 6.0) and disease-modifying therapy.Main Outcomes and MeasureSeverity of COVID-19 infection was based on hospital course, where a mild course was defined as the patient not requiring hospital admission, moderate severity was defined as the patient requiring hospital admission to the general floor only, and most severe was defined as requiring intensive care unit admission and/or death.ResultsFor the 40 patients, the median age was 52(45.5-61) years, 16/40(40%) were male, and 21/40(52.5%) were African American. 19/40(47.5%) had mild courses, 15/40(37.5%) had moderate courses, and 6/40(15%) had severe courses. Patients with moderate and severe courses were significantly older than those with a mild course (57[50-63] years old and 66[58.8-69.5] years old vs 48[40-51.5] years old, P=0.0121, P=0.0373). There was differing prevalence of progressive multiple sclerosis staging in those with more severe courses (severe:2/6[33.3%]primary-progressing and 0/6[0%]secondary-progressing, moderate:1/14[7.14%] and 5/14[35.7%] vs mild:0/19[0%] and 1/19[5.26%], P=0.0075, 1 unknown). Significant disability was found in 1/19(5.26%) mild course-patients, but was in 9/15(60%, P=0.00435) of moderate course-patients and 2/6(33.3%, P=0.200) of severe course-patients. Disease-modifying therapy prevalence did not differ among courses (mild:17/19[89.5%], moderate:12/15[80%] and severe:3/6[50%], P=0.123).Conclusions and RelevanceMultiple sclerosis patients with more severe COVID-19 courses tended to be older, were more likely to suffer from progressive staging, and had a higher degree of disability. However, disease-modifying therapy use was not different among courses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Niedziela ◽  
Monika Adamczyk-Sowa ◽  
Jacek T. Niedziela ◽  
Bogdan Mazur ◽  
Ewa Kluczewska ◽  
...  

The role of nitric oxide and its reactive derivatives (NOx) is well known in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, which is an inflammatory disease whileNOxseems to be important in coordinating inflammatory response. The purpose of the present study was to assess serumNOxas one of the nitrogen species and inflammatory parameters in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients and to compare the effectiveness of various types of disease-modifying therapies that reduce nitric oxide and inflammatory biomarkers. ElevatedNOxlevel was observed in patients who received the first-line disease-modifying therapy (interferons beta-1a and beta-1b) in comparison with the subjects treated with the second-line disease-modifying therapy (natalizumab; fingolimod) and healthy controls without significant differences in C-reactive protein and interleukin-1 beta. A negative correlation was observed between serumNOxlevel and the duration of multiple sclerosis confirmed in the whole study population and in subjects treated with the first-line agents. Only serumNOx, concentration could reveal a potential efficacy of disease-modifying therapy with a better reduction inNOxlevel due to the second-line agents of disease-modifying therapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. JCNSD.S5120 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Marriott

Fingolimod was recently approved for use in the United States after two phase III trials confirmed its effectiveness in reducing disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. These positive results, coupled with the important fact that this is the first oral disease-modifying therapy, has lead to considerable enthusiasm amongst physicians and patients. However, fingolimod is associated with rare but serious adverse events. In addition, unlike conventional disease-modifying therapies, cardiopulmonary, ophthalmological and dermatological safety monitoring unfamiliar to both neurologists and patients is required before and during treatment. This paper will discuss these issues from the perspective of using fingolimod as a first-line disease-modifying therapy in treatment-Naïve relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642110195
Author(s):  
Pietro Iaffaldano ◽  
Giuseppe Lucisano ◽  
Francesca Caputo ◽  
Damiano Paolicelli ◽  
Francesco Patti ◽  
...  

Background and aims: No consensus exists on how aggressively to treat relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) nor on the timing of the treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate disability trajectories in RRMS patients treated with an early intensive treatment (EIT) or with a moderate-efficacy treatment followed by escalation to higher-efficacy disease modifying therapy (ESC). Methods: RRMS patients with ⩾5-year follow-up and ⩾3 visits after disease modifying therapy (DMT) start were selected from the Italian MS Registry. EIT group included patients who received as first DMT fingolimod, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, cladribine. ESC group patients received the high efficacy DMT after ⩾1 year of glatiramer acetate, interferons, azathioprine, teriflunomide or dimethylfumarate treatment. Patients were 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched for characteristics at the first DMT. The disability trajectories were evaluated by applying a longitudinal model for repeated measures. The effect of early versus late start of high-efficacy DMT was assessed by the mean annual Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) changes compared with baseline values (delta-EDSS) in EIT and ESC groups. Results: The study cohort included 2702 RRMS patients. The PS matching procedure produced 363 pairs, followed for a median (interquartile range) of 8.5 (6.5–11.7) years. Mean annual delta-EDSS values were all significantly ( p < 0.02) higher in the ESC group compared with the EIT group. In particular, the mean delta-EDSS differences between the two groups tended to increase from 0.1 (0.01–0.19, p = 0.03) at 1 year to 0.30 (0.07–0.53, p = 0.009) at 5 years and to 0.67 (0.31–1.03, p = 0.0003) at 10 years. Conclusion: Our results indicate that EIT strategy is more effective than ESC strategy in controlling disability progression over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document