Construction of evidence-based practice competencies for nurses in China: A modified Delphi study

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 104927
Author(s):  
Liling Chen ◽  
Yanni Wu ◽  
Siqi Wang ◽  
Huihui Zhao ◽  
Chunlan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Modified Delphi

The Development of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Competencies in OT: A Modified Delphi Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (4_Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7311510238p1
Author(s):  
Christine Myers ◽  
Samantha DeMaria ◽  
Jamie Pomeranz
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Modified Delphi

Endorsement and Validation of the Essential Evidence‐Based Practice Competencies for Practicing Nurses in Finland: An Argument Delphi Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannele Saunders ◽  
Lynn Gallagher‐Ford ◽  
Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based

scholarly journals Content validity of a health science evidence-based practice questionnaire (HS-EBP) with a web-based modified Delphi approach

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Fernández-Domínguez ◽  
Albert Sesé-Abad ◽  
Jose Miguel Morales-Asencio ◽  
Pedro Sastre-Fullana ◽  
Sandra Pol-Castañeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Science Evidence

scholarly journals An Evidence-Based, Nursing Handover Standard for a Multisite Public Hospital in Switzerland: Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study

JMIR Nursing ◽  
10.2196/17876 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e17876
Author(s):  
Nadine Tacchini-Jacquier ◽  
Hélène Hertzog ◽  
Kilian Ambord ◽  
Peter Urben ◽  
Pierre Turini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Evidence Based Nursing

Background Ineffective communication procedures create openings for errors when health care professionals fail to transfer complete, consistent information. Deficient or absent clinical handovers, or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability, can have severe consequences for hospitalized patients. Clinical handovers are practiced every day, in many ways, in all institutional health care settings. Objective This study aimed to design an evidence-based, nursing handover standard for inpatients for use at shift changes or internal transfers between hospital wards. Methods We carried out a modified, multiround, web-based, Delphi data collection survey of an anonymized panel sample of 264 nurse experts working at a multisite public hospital in Switzerland. Each survey round was built on responses from the previous one. The surveys ended with a focus group discussion consisting of a randomly selected panel of participants to explain why items for the evidence-based clinical nursing handover standard were selected or not selected. Items had to achieve a consensus of ≥70% for selection and inclusion. Results The study presents the items selected by consensus for an evidence-based nursing handover standard for inpatients for use at shift changes or internal transfers. It also presents the reasons why survey items were or were not included. Conclusions This modified Delphi survey method enabled us to develop a consensus- and evidence-based nursing handover standard now being trialed at shift changes and the internal transfers of inpatients at our multisite public hospital in Switzerland.

Development of evidence‐based consensus on critical issues in the management of patients with vitiligo: A modified Delphi study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Min Bae ◽  
Ki‐Heon Jeong ◽  
Chong Won Choi ◽  
Ji Hun Park ◽  
Hee Jung Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Critical Issues

scholarly journals A framework of evidence-based practice for digital support, co-developed with and for the autism community

Autism ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1411-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Zervogianni ◽  
Sue Fletcher-Watson ◽  
Gerardo Herrera ◽  
Matthew Goodwin ◽  
Patricia Pérez-Fuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Online Reviews ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Autistic People ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Study Methodology

A wide array of digital supports (such as apps) have been developed for the autism community, many of which have little or no evidence to support their effectiveness. A Delphi study methodology was used to develop a consensus on what constitutes good evidence for digital supports among the broader autism community, including autistic people and their families, as well as autism-related professionals and researchers. A four-phase Delphi study consultation with 27 panel members resulted in agreement on three categories for which evidence is required: reliability, engagement and effectiveness of the technology. Consensus was also reached on four key sources of evidence for these three categories: hands-on experience, academic sources, expert views and online reviews. These were differentially weighted as sources of evidence within these three categories. Lay abstract Digital supports are any type of technologies that have been intentionally developed to improve daily living in some way. A wide array of digital supports (such as apps) have been developed for the autism community specifically, but there is little or no evidence of whether they work or not. This study sought to identify what types of evidence the autistic community valued and wanted to see provided to enable an informed choice to be made regarding digital supports. A consensus was developed between autistic people and their families, practitioners (such as therapists and teachers) as well as researchers, to identify the core aspects of evidence that everyone agreed were useful. In all, 27 people reached agreement on three categories for which evidence is required: reliability, engagement and the effectiveness of the technology. Consensus was also reached on four key sources of evidence for these three categories: hands-on experience, academic sources, expert views and online reviews. The resulting framework allows for any technology to be evaluated for the level of evidence identifying how effective it is. The framework can be used by autistic people, their families, practitioners and researchers to ensure that decisions concerning the provision of support for autistic people is informed by evidence, that is, ‘evidence-based practice’.

scholarly journals An Evidence-Based, Nursing Handover Standard for a Multisite Public Hospital in Switzerland: Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Tacchini-Jacquier ◽  
Hélène Hertzog ◽  
Kilian Ambord ◽  
Peter Urben ◽  
Pierre Turini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Evidence Based Nursing

BACKGROUND Ineffective communication procedures create openings for errors when health care professionals fail to transfer complete, consistent information. Deficient or absent clinical handovers, or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability, can have severe consequences for hospitalized patients. Clinical handovers are practiced every day, in many ways, in all institutional health care settings. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to design an evidence-based, nursing handover standard for inpatients for use at shift changes or internal transfers between hospital wards. METHODS We carried out a modified, multiround, web-based, Delphi data collection survey of an anonymized panel sample of 264 nurse experts working at a multisite public hospital in Switzerland. Each survey round was built on responses from the previous one. The surveys ended with a focus group discussion consisting of a randomly selected panel of participants to explain why items for the evidence-based clinical nursing handover standard were selected or not selected. Items had to achieve a consensus of ≥70% for selection and inclusion. RESULTS The study presents the items selected by consensus for an evidence-based nursing handover standard for inpatients for use at shift changes or internal transfers. It also presents the reasons why survey items were or were not included. CONCLUSIONS This modified Delphi survey method enabled us to develop a consensus- and evidence-based nursing handover standard now being trialed at shift changes and the internal transfers of inpatients at our multisite public hospital in Switzerland.

scholarly journals Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Handover Standard for a Multi-Site Public Hospital in Switzerland: Protocol for a Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study

10.2196/15910 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e15910
Author(s):  
Nadine Tacchini-Jacquier ◽  
Els de Waele ◽  
Peter Urben ◽  
Pierre Turini ◽  
Henk Verloo
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Communication Processes ◽  
Consistent Information ◽  
Hospital Wards ◽  
Evidence Based Nursing

Background Poor communication processes create opportunities for errors when caregivers fail to transfer complete and consistent information. Inadequate or nonexistent clinical handovers or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability can have dire consequences for hospitalized patients. Clinical handover is practiced every day, in a multitude of ways, in all health care settings. Objective The goal of this study is to build a consensus, evidence-based nursing handover standard for inpatients during shift changes or internal transfers between hospital wards. The study will be based on papers published by Slade et al. Methods This protocol describes a modified Delphi data-collection survey involving a targeted panel sample of 300 nurse experts. A multi-round survey will select an anonymous panel from a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland. Each survey stage will be described and will build on the previous one. The study will end with a focus group discussion involving a randomly selected panel to explain why items for the evidence-based clinical nursing handover standard were accepted or not accepted. An item must achieve a consensus of ≥70% for inclusion. Results The present study’s expected outcome is a consensus-built, evidence-based nursing handover standard for inpatients during shift changes or internal transfers between the wards of a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland. Conclusions This survey will enable us to develop an evidence-based nursing handover standard for use during shift changes and internal inpatient transfers in a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/15910

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document