scholarly journals Effect of postulated crack location on the pressure-temperature limit curve of reactor pressure vessel

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1681-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinbeom Choi ◽  
Han-Bum Surh ◽  
Jong-Wook Kim
Author(s):  
Yunjoo Lee ◽  
Hyosub Yoon ◽  
Kyuwan Kim ◽  
Jongmin Kim ◽  
Hyunmin Kim

Abstract Pressure-Temperature limit methodology is based on the rules of Appendix G in Section XI of the ASME Code in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix G, and the Appendix G in Section XI method refers to Welding Research Council (WRC) Bulletin 175 (WRC175). Flaw size is an important factor to protect the reactor pressure vessel from brittle failure but is not explicitly documented in WRC175. However, according to the recent change of Appendix G, the ¼ thickness (¼T) flaw size is postulated in the surface of the nozzle inner corner for the evaluation of Pressure-Temperature limit. In this paper, stress intensity factor is computed by using 3D finite element analysis (FEA) considering ¼T corner cracks of inlet nozzle and outlet nozzle in reactor pressure vessel. The result is compared with the stress intensity factor using influence function in the ASME Code. The results of stress intensity factor in accordance with the ASME Code are more conservative than those of the 3-D FEA with a crack. The allowable pressure and operation region in Pressure-Temperature limit curve are affected by the calculation methods of stress intensity factor.


Author(s):  
Hsoung-Wei Chou ◽  
Chin-Cheng Huang ◽  
Kuan-Rong Huang ◽  
Ru-Feng Liu

After the Code Case N-640 was issued in 1999, the fracture toughness curve of reactor pressure vessel materials in ASME Section XI-Appendix G was amended to the KIC curve. In Taiwan, the present pressure-temperature limit curves of normal reactor startup (heat-up) and shut-down (cool-down) for the reactor pressure vessel is still calculated per KIA curve in 1998 or earlier editions. In this paper, the failure risks of a Taiwan domestic reactor pressure vessel under various pressure-temperature limit operations are analyzed. First, the pressure-temperature limit curves of the Taiwan domestic reactor pressure vessel based on KIA and KIC curves, and various levels of embrittlement, are calculated. Then, the ORNL’s probabilistic fracture mechanics code, FAVOR, and the PNNL’s flaw model are utilized to assess the failure probabilities of the reactor pressure vessel under such pressure-temperature limit transients. Further, the deterministic analyses of FAVOR code are also conducted. It is found that under the pressure-temperature limit transients based on KIC curves, the reactor pressure vessel presents higher failure probabilities, but are all below the allowable risk. The present results indicate that using the KIC curve the pressure-temperature limits can either increase the operational margin or still maintains the sufficient stability of the analyzed reactor pressure vessel.


Author(s):  
Alexandria Carolan ◽  
Benjamin Mays ◽  
Anees Udyawar ◽  
J. Brian Hall

Abstract Nuclear plant reactor pressure vessel heat-up and cool-down pressure temperature (P-T) limit curves are determined using ASME Section XI, Appendix G. ASME has adopted into ASME Section XI Appendix G the allowable use of the ASTM E1921 master curve fracture toughness based reference temperature (T0) to index the KIc curve. ASME Section XI Code Case N-830 allows the use of the KJc 95% lower bound master curve indexed using T0 directly. In ASME Section XI Appendix G, the equation RTT0 = T0 + 19.4°C, as an alternate RTNDT, shifts the KIc curve to approximate the KJc 95% lower bound master curve, however, the KIc exponential curve parameters are different. Thus, this paper evaluates the impact on plant heatup and cooldown pressure-temperature limit curves between the two ASME approved methods for typical pressurized water reactors (PWR). Different degrees of embrittlement are assessed to determine differences in the two approaches on reactor pressure vessel (RPV) beltline operating curves. Furthermore, in the proposed Revision 19 of Regulatory Guide 1.147, the US NRC has included a condition on the use of Code Case N-830 that prohibits the use of the current KIc equation in ASME Section XI Appendix G when these values are above the KJc lower bound 95% curve at temperatures below T0 − 64°C. This paper briefly discusses this NRC condition on the P-T limit curves.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyeong-Geun Lee ◽  
Yong-Bok Lee ◽  
Min-Chul Kim ◽  
Junhyun Kwon

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 102798
Author(s):  
KaiTai Liu ◽  
Mei Huang ◽  
JunJie Lin ◽  
HaiPeng Jiang ◽  
BoXue Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5498
Author(s):  
Alvaro Rodríguez-Prieto ◽  
Mariaenrica Frigione ◽  
John Kickhofel ◽  
Ana M. Camacho

The growth of green energy technologies within the frame of the 7th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) along with the concern about climatic changes make nuclear energy an attractive choice for many countries to ensure energy security and sustainable development as well as to actively address environmental issues. Unlike nuclear equipment (immovable goods), which are often well-catalogued and analyzed, the design and manufacturing codes and their standardized materials specifications can be considered movable and intangible goods that have not been thoroughly studied based on a detailed evaluation of the scientific and technical literature on the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) materials behavior. The aim of this work is the analysis of historical advances in materials properties research and associated standardized design codes requirements. The analysis, based on the consolidated U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.99 Rev.2 model, enables determination of the best materials options, corresponding to some of the most widely used material specifications such as WWER 15Kh2MFAA (used from the 1970s and 1980s; already in operation), ASME SA-533 Grade B Cl.1 (used in pressurized water reactor-PWR 2nd–4th; already in operation), DIN 20MnMoNi55 and DIN 22NiMoCr37 (used in PWR 2nd–4th) as well as ASTM A-336 Grade F22V (current designs). Consequently, in view of the results obtained, it can be concluded that the best options correspond to recently developed or well-established specifications used in the design of pressurized water reactors. These assessments endorse the fact that nuclear technology is continually improving, with safety being its fundamental pillar. In the future, further research related to the technical heritage from the evolution of materials requirements for other clean and sustainable power generation technologies will be performed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 527 ◽  
pp. 167698
Author(s):  
Xuejiao Wang ◽  
Wenjiang Qiang ◽  
Guogang Shu ◽  
Junwei Qiao ◽  
Yucheng Wu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document