Effect of BDNF val66met polymorphism on declarative memory and its neural substrate: A meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 2165-2177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Kambeitz ◽  
Sagnik Bhattacharyya ◽  
Lana M. Kambeitz-Ilankovic ◽  
Isabel Valli ◽  
David A. Collier ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li He ◽  
Yanhui Liao ◽  
Qiuxia Wu ◽  
Tieqiao Liu

Background: Several studies had examined the association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism and methamphetamine (METH) use disorder, whereas the results were conflicting. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to achieve a pooled effect size of the association between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and METH use disorder.Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to July, 2020. All relevant studies on the relationship of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and METH addiction were retrieved. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated in the dominant, recessive, co-dominant, and allele model to appraise the association.Results: Seven case–control studies with a total of 2,204 subjects (956 METH-dependent cases and 1,248 healthy controls) were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed a significant correlation between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and METH dependence in overall population under different genetic models. However, subgroup analysis indicated that the association only existed in Han Chinese but not in other Asian populations.Conclusion: Although the current data indicate that BDNF Val66Met polymorphism might be a potential genetic factor for METH use disorder, more researches are needed to prove its role in different populations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 152 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itaru Miura ◽  
Jian-Ping Zhang ◽  
Masahiro Nitta ◽  
Todd Lencz ◽  
John M. Kane ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 4741-4750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia Jie Tan ◽  
Sheree Wan Ting Lim ◽  
Yi Long Toh ◽  
Terence Ng ◽  
Angie Yeo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. e52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina M. Hosang ◽  
Celia Shiles ◽  
Katherine E. Tansey ◽  
Peter McGuffin ◽  
Rudolf Uher

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Rai ◽  
Farhin Jamal ◽  
Pradeep Kumar

AbstractBipolar disorder (BPD) is a psychiatric disease, characterized by the cycles of mania and depression. Several genetic studies investigated BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphism as risk factor for BPD, but results were inconclusive. Therefore, present meta-analysis was performed to reevaluate the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and BPD association. Four databases (Pubmed, Springer Link, Science Direct and Google Scholar) were searched for eligible studies up to March 31,2018. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. All statistical analyses were done by MetaAnalyst and Mix program. Forty studies with a total of 28,787 subjects (10,085 cases and 18,702 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, pooled analysis indicated that there was no significant association between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and BPD risk under all five genetic models (ORA vs.G =0.99, 95%CI= 0.94-1.03, p=0.49; ORAG vs. GG= 0.1.02, 95%CI= 0.95-1.07, p= 0.57; ORAA vs. GG = 0.98, 95%CI=0.89-1.08, p=0.75; ORAA+AG vs. GG= 1.0, 95%CI= 0.94-1.06, p= 0.89;ORAA vs. AG+GG= 0.96, 95%CI= 0.89-1.05, p= 0.47). Similarly, no significant association was observed in ethnicity based subgroup analysis in both Asian and Caucasian population. However, significant association was found in subtype analysis between BDNF Val66Met and BPDII (ORAA+AG vs. GG= 1.21, 95%CI= 1.06-1.37, p= 0.003) but not with BPDI. These findings suggested that the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism confer no genetic susceptibility to BPD I but risk for BPDII.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document