Reactivation of visual cortical plasticity by NEP1-40 from early monocular deprivation in adult rats

2011 ◽  
Vol 494 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulin Luo ◽  
Xiaoying Wu ◽  
Shuangzhen Liu ◽  
Kuanshu Li
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Lunghi

In this research binocular rivalry is used as a tool to investigate different aspects of visual and multisensory perception. Several experiments presented here demonstrated that touch specifically interacts with vision during binocular rivalry and that the interaction likely occurs at early stages of visual processing, probably V1 or V2. Another line of research also presented here demonstrated that human adult visual cortex retains an unexpected high degree of experience-dependent plasticity by showing that a brief period of monocular deprivation produced important perceptual consequences on the dynamics of binocular rivalry, reflecting a homeostatic plasticity. In summary, this work shows that binocular rivalry is a powerful tool to investigate different aspects of visual perception and can be used to reveal unexpected properties of early visual cortex.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Seeliger ◽  
Jochen Triesch

Treatments for amblyopia focus on vision therapy and patching of one eye. Predicting the success of these methods remains difficult, however. Recent research has used binocular rivalry to monitor visual cortical plasticity during occlusion therapy, leading to a successful prediction of the recovery rate of the amblyopic eye. The underlying mechanisms and their relation to neural homeostatic plasticity are not known. Here we propose a spiking neural network to explain the effect of shortterm monocular deprivation on binocular rivalry. The model reproduces perceptual switches as observed experimentally. When one eye is occluded, inhibitory plasticity changes the balance between the eyes and leads to longer dominance periods for the eye that has been deprived. The model suggests that homeostatic inhibitory plasticity is a critical component of the observed effects and might play an important role in the recovery from amblyopia.


eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan S Kaplan ◽  
Sam F Cooke ◽  
Robert W Komorowski ◽  
Alexander A Chubykin ◽  
Aurore Thomazeau ◽  
...  

The roles played by cortical inhibitory neurons in experience-dependent plasticity are not well understood. Here we evaluate the participation of parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) GABAergic neurons in two forms of experience-dependent modification of primary visual cortex (V1) in adult mice: ocular dominance (OD) plasticity resulting from monocular deprivation and stimulus-selective response potentiation (SRP) resulting from enriched visual experience. These two forms of plasticity are triggered by different events but lead to a similar increase in visual cortical response. Both also require the NMDA class of glutamate receptor (NMDAR). However, we find that PV+ inhibitory neurons in V1 play a critical role in the expression of SRP and its behavioral correlate of familiarity recognition, but not in the expression of OD plasticity. Furthermore, NMDARs expressed within PV+ cells, reversibly inhibited by the psychotomimetic drug ketamine, play a critical role in SRP, but not in the induction or expression of adult OD plasticity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Z. Hong ◽  
Shiyong Huang ◽  
Daniel Severin ◽  
Alfredo Kirkwood

SUMMARYNeuromodulatory systems are essential for remodeling glutamatergic connectivity during experience-dependent cortical plasticity. This permissive/enabling function of neuromodulators has been associated with their capacity to facilitate the induction of Hebbian forms of long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) by affecting cellular and network excitability. In vitro studies indicate that neuromodulators can also affect the expression of Hebbian plasticity in a pull-push manner: receptors coupled to the G-protein Gs promote the expression of LTP at the expense of LTD, and Gq-coupled receptors promote LTD at the expense of LTD. Here we show that the pull-push mechanism can be recruited in vivo by pairing brief monocular stimulation with pharmacological or chemogenetical activation of Gs- or Gq-coupled receptors to respectively enhance or reduce visual cortical responses. These changes were stable, can be induced in adults after the termination of the critical period for juvenile ocular dominance plasticity, and can rescue deficits induced by prolonged monocular deprivation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Menicucci ◽  
Claudia Lunghi ◽  
Andrea Zaccaro ◽  
Maria Concetta Morrone ◽  
Angelo Gemignani

Sleep and plasticity are highly interrelated, as sleep slow oscillations and sleep spindles are associated with consolidation of Hebbian-based processes. However, in adult humans, visual cortical plasticity is mainly sustained by homeostatic mechanisms, for which the role of sleep is still largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that non-REM sleep stabilizes homeostatic plasticity of ocular dominance in adult humans. We found that the effect of short-term monocular deprivation (boost of the deprived eye) was preserved at the morning awakening (>6 hours after deprivation). Subjects exhibiting stronger consolidation had increased sleep spindle density in frontopolar electrodes, suggesting distributed consolidation processes. Crucially, the individual susceptibility to visual homeostatic plasticity was encoded by changes in sleep slow oscillation rate and shape and spindle power in occipital sites, consistent with an early visual cortical site of ocular dominance homeostatic plasticity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 2555-2572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-fai Fong ◽  
Peter Sb Finnie ◽  
Taekeun Kim ◽  
Aurore Thomazeau ◽  
Eitan S Kaplan ◽  
...  

Abstract Primary visual cortex (V1) is the locus of numerous forms of experience-dependent plasticity. Restricting visual stimulation to one eye at a time has revealed that many such forms of plasticity are eye-specific, indicating that synaptic modification occurs prior to binocular integration of thalamocortical inputs. A common feature of these forms of plasticity is the requirement for NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation in V1. We therefore hypothesized that NMDARs in cortical layer 4 (L4), which receives the densest thalamocortical input, would be necessary for all forms of NMDAR-dependent and input-specific V1 plasticity. We tested this hypothesis in awake mice using a genetic approach to selectively delete NMDARs from L4 principal cells. We found, unexpectedly, that both stimulus-selective response potentiation and potentiation of open-eye responses following monocular deprivation (MD) persist in the absence of L4 NMDARs. In contrast, MD-driven depression of deprived-eye responses was impaired in mice lacking L4 NMDARs, as was L4 long-term depression in V1 slices. Our findings reveal a crucial requirement for L4 NMDARs in visual cortical synaptic depression, and a surprisingly negligible role for them in cortical response potentiation. These results demonstrate that NMDARs within distinct cellular subpopulations support different forms of experience-dependent plasticity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 26-37
Author(s):  
Michael S. Jacob ◽  
Brian J. Roach ◽  
Holly K. Hamilton ◽  
Ricardo E. Carrión ◽  
Aysenil Belger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 11-21
Author(s):  
Rhiânan E. Ellis ◽  
Elizabeth Milne ◽  
Liat Levita

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document