Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution and motor imagery combined with virtual action observation

2021 ◽  
pp. 135907
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Suzuki ◽  
Naotsugu Kaneko ◽  
Atsushi Sasaki ◽  
Fumiya Tanaka ◽  
Kimitaka Nakazawa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 105768
Author(s):  
Fabio Castro ◽  
Paulina Anna Bryjka ◽  
Giovanni Di Pino ◽  
Aleksandra Vuckovic ◽  
Alexander Nowicky ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takefumi Moriuchi ◽  
Akira Nakashima ◽  
Jiro Nakamura ◽  
Kimika Anan ◽  
Keita Nishi ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e019646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Behrendt ◽  
Corina Schuster-Amft

IntroductionIn the recent past, training systems using an interactive virtual environment have been introduced to neurorehabilitation. Such systems can be applied to encourage purposeful limb movements and will increasingly be used at home by the individual patient. Therefore, an integrated valid and reliable assessment tool on the basis of such a system to monitor the recovery process would be an essential asset.ObjectivesThe aim of the study is to evaluate usability, feasibility and validity of the digital version of the Action Research Arm Test using the Bi-Manu-Trainer system as a platform. Additionally, the feasibility and usability of the implementation of action observation and motor imagery tasks into the Bi-Manu-Trainer software will be evaluated.Patients and methodsThis observational study is planned as a single-arm trial for testing the new assessment and the action observation and motor imagery training module. Therefore, 75 patients with Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, traumatic brain injury or Guillain-Barré syndrome will be included. 30 out of the 75 patients will additionally take part in a 4-week training on the enhanced Bi-Manu-Trainer system. Primary outcomes will be the score on the System Usability Scale and the correlation between the conventional and digital Action Research Arm Test scores. Secondary outcomes will be hand dexterity, upper limb activities of daily living and quality of life.HypothesisWe hypothesise that the digital Action Research Arm Test assessment is a valid and essential tool and that it is feasible to incorporate action observation and motor imagery into Bi-Manu-Trainer practice. The results are expected to give recommendations for necessary modifications and might also contribute knowledge concerning the application of action observation and motor imagery tasks using a training system such as the Bi-Manu-Trainer.Trial registration numberNCT03268304; Pre-results.


PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Jiang Meng ◽  
Yan-Ling Pi ◽  
Ke Liu ◽  
Na Cao ◽  
Yan-Qiu Wang ◽  
...  

Background Both motor imagery (MI) and motor execution (ME) can facilitate motor cortical excitability. Although cortical excitability is modulated by intracortical inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human primary motor cortex, it is not clear which intracortical circuits determine the differences in corticospinal excitability between ME and MI. Methods We recruited 10 young healthy subjects aged 18−28 years (mean age: 22.1 ± 3.14 years; five women and five men) for this study. The experiment consisted of two sets of tasks involving grasp actions of the right hand: imagining and executing them. Corticospinal excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured before the interventional protocol using transcranial magnetic stimulation (baseline), as well as at 0, 20, and 40 min (T0, T20, and T40) thereafter. Results Facilitation of corticospinal excitability was significantly greater after ME than after MI in the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) at T0 and T20 (p < 0.01 for T0, and p < 0.05 for T20), but not in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. On the other hand, no significant differences in SICI between ME and MI were found in the APB and FDI muscles. The facilitation of corticospinal excitability at T20 after MI correlated with the Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) scores for kinesthetic items (Rho = −0.646, p = 0.044) but did not correlate with the MIQ scores for visual items (Rho = −0.265, p = 0.458). Discussion The present results revealed significant differences between ME and MI on intracortical excitatory circuits of the human motor cortex, suggesting that cortical excitability differences between ME and MI may be attributed to the activation differences of the excitatory circuits in the primary motor cortex.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1917-1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Romano Smith ◽  
Greg Wood ◽  
Ginny Coyles ◽  
James W. Roberts ◽  
Caroline J. Wakefield

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Wright ◽  
Greg Wood ◽  
Daniel L. Eaves ◽  
Adam M. Bruton ◽  
Cornelia Frank ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 237 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahito Yasui ◽  
Tomofumi Yamaguchi ◽  
Shigeo Tanabe ◽  
Tsuyoshi Tatemoto ◽  
Yoko Takahashi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 707 ◽  
pp. 134284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuka Shironouchi ◽  
Chiaki Ohtaka ◽  
Nobuaki Mizuguchi ◽  
Kouki Kato ◽  
Ryusuke Kakigi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document