Joint neuronal tuning for object form and position in the human lateral occipital complex

NeuroImage ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1901-1908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. MacEvoy ◽  
Zoe Yang
2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe A. Chouinard ◽  
Deiter K. Meena ◽  
Robert L. Whitwell ◽  
Matthew D. Hilchey ◽  
Melvyn A. Goodale

We used TMS to assess the causal roles of the lateral occipital (LO) and caudal intraparietal sulcus (cIPS) areas in the perceptual discrimination of object features. All participants underwent fMRI to localize these areas using a protocol in which they passively viewed images of objects that varied in both form and orientation. fMRI identified six significant brain regions: LO, cIPS, and the fusiform gyrus, bilaterally. In a separate experimental session, we applied TMS to LO or cIPS while the same participants performed match-to-sample form or orientation discrimination tasks. Compared with sham stimulation, TMS to either the left or right LO increased RTs for form but not orientation discrimination, supporting a critical role for LO in form processing for perception- and judgment-based tasks. In contrast, we did not observe any effects when we applied TMS to cIPS. Thus, despite the clear functional evidence of engagement for both LO and cIPS during the passive viewing of objects in the fMRI experiment, the TMS experiment revealed that cIPS is not critical for making perceptual judgments about their form or orientation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Demeyer ◽  
P. De Graef ◽  
J. Wagemans ◽  
K. Verfaillie
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1366-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariya E. Manahova ◽  
Pim Mostert ◽  
Peter Kok ◽  
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen ◽  
Floris P. de Lange

Prior knowledge about the visual world can change how a visual stimulus is processed. Two forms of prior knowledge are often distinguished: stimulus familiarity (i.e., whether a stimulus has been seen before) and stimulus expectation (i.e., whether a stimulus is expected to occur, based on the context). Neurophysiological studies in monkeys have shown suppression of spiking activity both for expected and for familiar items in object-selective inferotemporal cortex. It is an open question, however, if and how these types of knowledge interact in their modulatory effects on the sensory response. To address this issue and to examine whether previous findings generalize to noninvasively measured neural activity in humans, we separately manipulated stimulus familiarity and expectation while noninvasively recording human brain activity using magnetoencephalography. We observed independent suppression of neural activity by familiarity and expectation, specifically in the lateral occipital complex, the putative human homologue of monkey inferotemporal cortex. Familiarity also led to sharpened response dynamics, which was predominantly observed in early visual cortex. Together, these results show that distinct types of sensory knowledge jointly determine the amount of neural resources dedicated to object processing in the visual ventral stream.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 2013-2023
Author(s):  
John M. Henderson ◽  
Jessica E. Goold ◽  
Wonil Choi ◽  
Taylor R. Hayes

During real-world scene perception, viewers actively direct their attention through a scene in a controlled sequence of eye fixations. During each fixation, local scene properties are attended, analyzed, and interpreted. What is the relationship between fixated scene properties and neural activity in the visual cortex? Participants inspected photographs of real-world scenes in an MRI scanner while their eye movements were recorded. Fixation-related fMRI was used to measure activation as a function of lower- and higher-level scene properties at fixation, operationalized as edge density and meaning maps, respectively. We found that edge density at fixation was most associated with activation in early visual areas, whereas semantic content at fixation was most associated with activation along the ventral visual stream including core object and scene-selective areas (lateral occipital complex, parahippocampal place area, occipital place area, and retrosplenial cortex). The observed activation from semantic content was not accounted for by differences in edge density. The results are consistent with active vision models in which fixation gates detailed visual analysis for fixated scene regions, and this gating influences both lower and higher levels of scene analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document