scholarly journals The role of hippocampal mossy cells in novelty detection

2021 ◽  
pp. 107486
Author(s):  
Felipe Fredes ◽  
Ryuichi Shigemoto
NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S42
Author(s):  
M Garcia-Garcia ◽  
J Yordanova ◽  
V Kolev ◽  
J Dominguez-Borras ◽  
C Escera

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2137-2152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Snyder ◽  
Andreas Keil

Habituation refers to a decline in orienting or responding to a repeated stimulus, and can be inferred to reflect learning about the properties of the repeated stimulus when followed by increased orienting to a novel stimulus (i.e., novelty detection). Habituation and novelty detection paradigms have been used for over 40 years to study perceptual and mnemonic processes in the human infant, yet important questions remain about the nature of these processes in infants. The aim of the present study was to examine the neural mechanisms underlying habituation and novelty detection in infants. Specifically, we investigated changes in induced alpha, beta, and gamma activity in 6-month-old infants during repeated presentations of either a face or an object, and examined whether these changes predicted behavioral responses to novelty at test. We found that induced gamma activity over occipital scalp regions decreased with stimulus repetition in the face condition but not in the toy condition, and that greater decreases in the gamma band were associated with enhanced orienting to a novel face at test. The pattern and topography of these findings are consistent with observations of repetition suppression in the occipital–temporal visual processing pathway, and suggest that encoding in infant habituation paradigms may reflect a form of perceptual learning. Implications for the role of repetition suppression in infant habituation and novelty detection are discussed with respect to a biased competition model of visual attention.


2012 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léri Morin-Audebrand ◽  
Jos Mojet ◽  
Claire Chabanet ◽  
Sylvie Issanchou ◽  
Per Møller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 437-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar ◽  
Ildiko Aradi ◽  
Ivan Soltesz

Mossy cell loss and mossy fiber sprouting are two characteristic consequences of repeated seizures and head trauma. However, their precise contributions to the hyperexcitable state are not well understood. Because it is difficult, and frequently impossible, to independently examine using experimental techniques whether it is the loss of mossy cells or the sprouting of mossy fibers that leads to dentate hyperexcitability, we built a biophysically realistic and anatomically representative computational model of the dentate gyrus to examine this question. The 527-cell model, containing granule, mossy, basket, and hilar cells with axonal projections to the perforant-path termination zone, showed that even weak mossy fiber sprouting (10–15% of the strong sprouting observed in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy) resulted in the spread of seizure-like activity to the adjacent model hippocampal laminae after focal stimulation of the perforant path. The simulations also indicated that the spatially restricted, lamellar distribution of the sprouted mossy fiber contacts reported in in vivo studies was an important factor in sustaining seizure-like activity in the network. In contrast to the robust hyperexcitability-inducing effects of mossy fiber sprouting, removal of mossy cells resulted in decreased granule cell responses to perforant-path activation in agreement with recent experimental data. These results indicate the crucial role of mossy fiber sprouting even in situations where there is only relatively weak mossy fiber sprouting as is the case after moderate concussive experimental head injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (29) ◽  
pp. e2025275118
Author(s):  
María Carolina Gonzalez ◽  
Janine I. Rossato ◽  
Andressa Radiske ◽  
Lia R. M. Bevilaqua ◽  
Martín Cammarota

Consolidation and reconsolidation are independent memory processes. Consolidation stabilizes new memories, whereas reconsolidation restabilizes memories destabilized when reactivated during recall. However, the biological role of the destabilization/reconsolidation cycle is still unknown. It has been hypothesized that reconsolidation links new information with reactivated memories, but some reports suggest that new and old memories are associated through consolidation mechanisms instead. Object-recognition memory (ORM) serves to judge the familiarity of items and is essential for remembering previous events. We took advantage of the fact that ORM consolidation, destabilization, and reconsolidation can be pharmacologically dissociated to demonstrate that, depending on the activation state of hippocampal dopamine D1/D5 receptors, the memory of a novel object presented during recall of the memory of a familiar one can be formed via reconsolidation or consolidation, but only reconsolidation can link them. We also found that recognition memories formed through reconsolidation can be destabilized even if indirectly reactivated. Our results indicate that dopamine couples novelty detection with memory destabilization to determine whether a new recognition trace is associated with an active network and suggest that declarative reminders should be used with caution during reconsolidation-based psychotherapeutic interventions.


NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1038-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Garcia-Garcia ◽  
Juliana Yordanova ◽  
Vasil Kolev ◽  
Judith Domínguez-Borràs ◽  
Carles Escera

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schomaker ◽  
M.M.E. Grouls ◽  
E. Rau ◽  
M. Hendriks ◽  
A. Colon ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesThe goal of the present study was to identify the role of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) in the detection and later processing of novelty stimuli.MethodsTwenty-one epilepsy patients with unilateral MTL resection (10 left-sided; 11 right-sided) performed an adapted visual novelty oddball task. In this task two streams of stimuli were presented on the left and right of fixation while the patients’ electroencephalogram was measured. Patients responded to infrequent target stimuli, while ignoring frequent standard, and infrequent novel stimuli that could appear either contra- or ipsilateral to the resected side.ResultsNovelty detection, as indexed by the N2 ERP component elicited by novels, was not affected by the MTL resections. Later processing of novels, however, as indexed by the novelty P3 ERP component, was reduced for novels presented contra-versus ipsilateral to the resected side. Target processing, as indexed by the P3b, was unaffected.ConclusionsThe current results suggest that MTL structures play a role in novelty processing, but that the novelty signal may originate from a distinct neural source.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1993-2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Vitay ◽  
Fred H. Hamker

The perirhinal cortex is involved not only in object recognition and novelty detection but also in multimodal integration, reward association, and visual working memory. We propose a computational model that focuses on the role of the perirhinal cortex in working memory, particularly with respect to sustained activities and memory retrieval. This model describes how different partial informations are integrated into assemblies of neurons that represent the identity of an object. Through dopaminergic modulation, the resulting clusters can retrieve the global information with recurrent interactions between neurons. Dopamine leads to sustained activities after stimulus disappearance that form the basis of the involvement of the perirhinal cortex in visual working memory processes. The information carried by a cluster can also be retrieved by a partial thalamic or prefrontal stimulation. Thus, we suggest that areas involved in planning and memory coordination encode a pointer to access the detailed information encoded in the associative cortex such as the perirhinal cortex.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Pierzchajlo ◽  
Jonas Olofsson

Although our understanding of human olfactory perception has increased dramatically, it remains less well understood how olfaction interacts with cognitive processes. In this overview, we review the claim that olfaction evolved to predominantly embody “novelty detection”, a framework that leaves little room for cognitive representations and processes. We challenge this framework by pointing to several perceived limitations. Instead, we argue that human olfaction is best understood in terms of its reliance on top-down processes; visual or verbal contexts may generate predictions of odor qualities, and a fundamental role of olfaction is to evaluate such predictions. We hypothesize that olfaction is to a large extent dependent on “top-down” cognitive processes. We discuss how this framework differs from other contemporary approaches to human olfactory perception. We conclude that in contrast to other frameworks that characterize olfaction primarily in terms of stimulus-driven perception, human olfactory processing is best understood by invoking a “view from the top”.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document