Erratum to: “Baryonic resonances from baryon decuplet-meson octet interaction” [Nucl. Phys. A 750 (2005) 294]

2006 ◽  
Vol 780 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sourav Sarkar ◽  
E. Oset ◽  
M.J. Vicente-Vacas
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 175-176 ◽  
pp. e3
Author(s):  
J. Angle ◽  
E. Aprile ◽  
F. Arneodo ◽  
L. Baudis ◽  
A. Bernstein ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 548 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 640
Author(s):  
D. Gianzo ◽  
J.O. Madsen ◽  
J. Sánchez Guillén
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850008
Author(s):  
Sen Hu ◽  
Guozhen Wu

We consider backreacted [Formula: see text] coupled with [Formula: see text] massive flavors introduced by D7 branes. The backreacted geometry is in the Veneziano limit with fixed [Formula: see text]. By dividing one of the directions into a line segment with length l, we get two subspaces. Then we calculate the entanglement entropy between them. With the method of [I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov and A. Murugan, Nucl. Phys. B 796, 274 (2008)], we are able to find the cut-off independent part of the entanglement entropy and finally find that this geometry shows no confinement/deconfinement phase transition at zero temperature from the holographic entanglement entropy point of view similar to the case in pure [Formula: see text].


1998 ◽  
Vol 513 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerzy Jurkiewicz ◽  
Maciej A. Nowak ◽  
Ismail Zahed

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1127-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Belchev ◽  
S.G. Neale ◽  
M.A. Walton

The poles of the quantum scattering matrix (S-matrix) in the complex momentum plane have been studied extensively. Bound states give rise to S-matrix poles, and other poles correspond to non-normalizable antibound, resonance, and antiresonance states. They describe important physics but their locations can be difficult to determine. In pioneering work, Nussenzveig (Nucl. Phys. 11, 499 (1959)) performed the analysis for a square well (wall), and plotted the flow of the poles as the potential depth (height) varied. More than fifty years later, however, little has been done in the way of direct generalization of those results. We point out that today we can find such poles easily and efficiently using numerical techniques and widely available software. We study the poles of the scattering matrix for the simplest piecewise flat potentials, with one and two adjacent (nonzero) pieces. For the finite well (wall) the flow of the poles as a function of the depth (height) recovers the results of Nussenzveig. We then analyze the flow for a potential with two independent parts that can be attractive or repulsive, the two-piece potential. These examples provide some insight into the complicated behavior of the resonance, antiresonance, and antibound poles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document