scholarly journals Struggling over shellfish: How diverging perceptions of marine nature distort deliberative governance

2020 ◽  
Vol 198 ◽  
pp. 105384
Author(s):  
Susan de Koning ◽  
Nathalie A. Steins ◽  
Hilde M. Toonen
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Governance

Citizens–experts’ interactions under different institutional arrangements: assessing the role of uncertainty, interests, and values

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-879
Author(s):  
Francesco Bogliacino ◽  
Cristiano Codagnone ◽  
Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Institutional Arrangements ◽  
Value Conflicts ◽  
Normative Criterion ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Deliberative Governance

AbstractIn this paper, we develop a framework to analyze the relationship between evidence and policy. Postulating a normative criterion based on cost–benefit analysis and the value of a piece of information, as well as a topology of the policy space defined by three characteristics (epistemic uncertainty, interests, and the degree of value conflicts), we identify the (Nash) equilibria of an interaction between experts and citizens in providing information to a decision maker. In this setup, we study three institutional arrangements (evidence-based policy, deliberative governance, and negotiated conflict) that differ in terms of reliance on experts and citizens for providing information. We show that different degrees of uncertainty, interests, and value-relevance surrounding the issue at stake result in vastly different arrangement performances; hence, to foster efficiency, rules should be contingent.

The Burgeoning but Still Experimental Practice of Deliberative Governance in South Korean Local Policy Making: The Cases of Seoul and Gwangju

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae In Park ◽  
Pan Suk Kim ◽  
David H. Rosenbloom
Keyword(s):  
Consensus Building ◽  
Collective Decision Making ◽  
Local Policy ◽  
South Korean ◽  
Policy Choices ◽  
Citizen Empowerment ◽  
Limited Degree ◽  
Deliberative Processes ◽  
Deliberative Governance ◽  
Experimental Stage

Research on deliberative governance does not include many case studies on South Korea. We analyze deliberative governance in the Seoul and Gwangju Metropolitan Governments, drawing comparisons and lessons for operating effective deliberative governance to promote consensus building, citizen empowerment, and legitimation of policy choices through collective decision making. The two cases incorporate the characteristics of deliberative governance to a limited degree and in an experimental stage. Based on a comparison of the two cases, we discuss the application and limitations of deliberative processes along with suggestions for potentially improving the practice of deliberative governance in the South Korean context.

scholarly journals A Case Study on the Failure of a Deliberative Governance

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
홍성만 ◽  
김광구
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Governance

Deliberative governance in the context of power

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn M. Hendriks
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Governance

scholarly journals Impediments to Deliberative Governance: Meta-analysis on Korean Cases

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-216
Author(s):  
권향원 ◽  
한수정 ◽  
김성민
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Deliberative Governance

scholarly journals Intelligence and Information Gathering Through Deliberative Crowdsourcing

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Y. Clark ◽  
Nicholas Zingale ◽  
Joseph Logan
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Information Gathering ◽  
Competing Values ◽  
Public Managers ◽  
New Knowledge ◽  
Scott Adams ◽  
Wisdom Of The Crowds ◽  
Deliberative Governance ◽  
Potential Opportunity

The hollowing of the state has added new challenges for administrators attending to the competing values of the administration. This article examines how the wisdom of the crowds can be used in a deliberative manner to extract new knowledge through crowdsourcing. We will specifically examine cases of intelligence and information gathering through the analysis of a suspected nuclear reactor in Syria and the use of the crowd in mapping unknown or rapidly changing environments. Through case analysis, this article seeks to understand if crowdsourcing can offer a potential opportunity for public managers to reduce transactions costs while engaging the crowd in a form of deliberative governance to understand and potentially solve public problems. Our approach involves applying the seven lessons of deliberative governance (Scott, Adams, & Wechsler, 2004) to our cases in order to produce five administrative concepts for creating mini-publics for deliberative crowdsourcing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document