Supply chain coordination through capacity reservation contract and quantity flexibility contract

Omega ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 102195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbin Li ◽  
Xiaomeng Luo ◽  
Qifei Wang ◽  
Weihua Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Capacity Reservation ◽  
Quantity Flexibility ◽  
Quantity Flexibility Contract

scholarly journals Supply Chain Coordination with a Loss-Averse Retailer and Combined Contract

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 586
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Ying Qiao ◽  
Han Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Confidence Levels ◽  
Quantity Flexibility ◽  
Quantity Flexibility Contract

This paper studies the supply chain coordination where the retailer is loss-averse, and a combined buyback and quantity flexibility contract is introduced. The loss-averse retailer’s objective is to maximize the Conditional Value-at-Risk of utility. It is shown the combined contract can coordinate the chain and a unique coordinating wholesale price exists if the confidence level is below a threshold. Moreover, the retailer’s optimal order quantity, expected utility and coordinating wholesale price are decreasing in loss aversion and confidence levels, respectively. We also find that when the contract parameters are restricted, the combined contract may coordinate the supply chain even though neither of its component contracts coordinate the chain.

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Disruptive Demand

2010 ◽  
Vol 44-47 ◽  
pp. 96-100
Author(s):  
Chuan Bo Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Decentralized Supply Chain ◽  
Optimal Capacity ◽  
Capacity Reservation ◽  
Chain Operation ◽  
Baseline Case ◽  
Supply Chain Operation ◽  
Better Than

Under the circumstance of disruptive demand, the decision-making and coordination of enterprise’s capacity is directly related to the efficiency of supply chain operation. On the basis of the baseline case, capacity reservation contract sees that the performance of decentralized supply chain is equal to the centralized supply chain, and better than the level of the optimal supply chain capacity under the wholesale price contract. For disruptive demand, this paper discusses the conditions of capacity expansion and supply chain coordination through the capacity reservation contract in two cases, i.e., symmetric disruptive information, asymmetric disruptive information, and compares the optimal capacity and the corresponding profit.

SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION WITH CVaR CRITERION

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 135-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEI YANG ◽  
MINGHUI XU ◽  
GANG YU ◽  
HANQIN ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Retail Price ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Mild Conditions ◽  
Quantity Flexibility ◽  
Buy Back

We study the coordination of supply chains with a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer. Different from the downside risk setting, in a conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) framework, we show that the supply chain can be coordinated with the revenue-sharing, buy-back, two-part tariff and quantity flexibility contracts. Furthermore the revenue-sharing contracts are still equivalent to the buy-back contracts when the retail price is fixed. At the same time, it is shown that the risk-averse retailer of the coordinated supply chain can increase its profit by raising its risk-averse degree under mild conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document