Prognostic determinants of locally advanced buccal mucosa cancer: Do we need to relook the current staging criteria? – Needs to be interpreted carefully

Oral Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
Shivakumar Thiagarajan ◽  
Sudhir V. Nair
Oral Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Pillai ◽  
Vishal Yadav ◽  
Vikram Kekatpure ◽  
Nirav Trivedi ◽  
Naveen Hedne Chandrashekar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 94s-94s
Author(s):  
M. Merja ◽  
P. Kasbekar ◽  
S. Pandya

Background: Buccal mucosa squamous cell cancer is the most common cancer in India. Majority of them presenting in advanced stage whose prognosis after surgery depends significantly upon the regional and distal spread. We studied the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on nodal and distal control of disease in operated cases of advanced buccal mucosa cancer. Aim: A retrospective study to evaluate the impact of induction chemotherapy (NACT) on nodal and distal failure in locally advanced buccal mucosa cancer. Methods: A total of 224 patients of advanced buccal mucosal cancer who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2015 were evaluated retrospectively with a follow-up of two years. Total 111 of the above had received NACT prior to surgery while 113 patients underwent upfront surgery. The CT scans and histologic reports were then compared for evaluation and analysis. Results: Among patients with T4a disease, 45.85% in upfront surgery group compared with 54% in NACT group showed metastatic pathologic nodes, while in T4b patients, the rates were 83.33% compared with 49.18% respectively. In patients with clinical/radiologic positive neck nodes at presentation, 87.5% in upfront surgery group as compared with 55.55% in NACT group showed metastatic nodes in histopathologic evaluation. 13.27% patients in the upfront surgery group had nodal and/or distal failure in the two years follow-up, whereas only 3.6% patients in the NACT group. 25% patients with peri-nodal extension in upfront surgery group showed nodal and/or distal failure, while only 6% in NACT group. The results in different nodal-ratio strata was evaluated. It showed that NACT has equal failure rate as in upfront group in nodal-ratio > 50, which is considered as very advanced and aggressive tumor. But in patients with nodal-ratio < 50, NACT group showed lesser failure rate than upfront group. Conclusion: We show regressional effect of NACT on nodal metastases. This study also shows NACT to be having a significantly positive impact on nodal and distal control. Hence role of induction chemotherapy needs to be considered in advanced cases of buccal mucosa cancer with nodal metastases.


Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 105246
Author(s):  
Ashwini Munnangi ◽  
Abhimanyu Kadapathri ◽  
Vijay Pillai ◽  
Vivek Shetty ◽  
Vidyabhushan Rangappa ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMO.S407
Author(s):  
Oren Cahlon ◽  
Ashok Shaha ◽  
Nancy Lee

Background Concurrent chemoradiation is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. The full extent of treatment related complications has not been completely documented in the literature. Methods We present the case of a patient treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy and concurrent carboplatin and fluorouracil for a locally advanced oral cavity and base of tongue cancer. Results The patient suffered acute grade 4 dermatitis and mucositis during treatment. One month after completion of treatment, the patient was found to have permanent adherence of the tongue to the buccal mucosa as a result of severe scar tissue formation. Conclusions As more patients undergo chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer, the full extent of treatment related complications are being identified. To our knowledge, this is the first report of chemoradiation for head and neck cancer resulting in adherence of the tongue to the buccal mucosa.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
GouraKishor Rath ◽  
PurvishM Parikh ◽  
Balakrishnan Rajan ◽  
Sandeep Kumar ◽  
Hemant Malhotra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document