In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets to aged composite using a self-adhesive composite: Effect of surface conditioning and different bonding agents

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 528-537
Author(s):  
Sara Valizadeh ◽  
Golnoosh Alimohammadi ◽  
Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik ◽  
Ardavan Etemadi ◽  
Behrad Tanbakuchi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Composite Effect ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Aged Composite ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive

LASER THERAPY ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazanin Kiomarsi ◽  
Melika Espahbodi ◽  
Nasim Chiniforush ◽  
Mohammad Javd Karazifard ◽  
Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Composite Effect ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Effect Of Surface

In Vitro Evaluation of a Cyanoacrylate Bonding Agent

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Howells ◽  
Peter Jones
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Strength Performance ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive ◽  
Acid Etch

A new cyanoacrylate adhesive developed for orthodontic use was subjected to a controlled in vitro trial of ultimate shear bond strength. Performance deteriorated on storage in saline, rendering the material unsuitable for clinical use. Other alternatives to conventional acid-etch retained composite resin bonding agents are discussed.

scholarly journals In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep ÖZKURT ◽  
Ender KAZAZOGLU ◽  
Ahmet ÜNAL
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF THREE SELF-ETCH DENTIN BONDING AGENTS TO DENTIN: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 454-459
Author(s):  
Bhalla V. ◽  
◽  
K. Goud M. ◽  
Chockattu S. ◽  
Khera A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Self Etch

Background:Dentin bonding is an ever-evolving field in adhesive dentistry. With the introduction of newer systems into the market, there is a crucial need to test their efficiency in terms of bond strength. Dual-cured adhesives in theory may provide for a better degree of conversion as compared to conventional light-cured adhesives .Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of three different self-etch adhesives namely ClearfilSE bond (Kuraray), Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) and Futura Bond DC (Voco) to dentin. Materials & Methods: Ninety extracted non-carious, intact human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Each tooth was decoronated using a double-sided diamond disc with water coolant to a depth of 2mm from the cusp tip .The cut dentin surface was then abraded against 600-grit wet silicon carbide papers for 60 seconds to produce a uniform smear layer. The root portion of each tooth was mounted on a plastic ring using cold cure acrylic resin. Specimens were then divided into three adhesive groups of 30 teeth each, Group A: ClearfilSE Bond (Kuraray), Group B: Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent), Group C :Futura Bond DC (Voco). All bonding agents were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions, in combination with the resin composite Tetric N Ceram (IvoclarVivadent). The samples were thermocycled, followed by shear bond strength testing using a Universal testing machine (Hounsfield). Data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P<0.05) and Post hoc Tukey’s test for inter- and intra- group analysis respectively. Results: Clearfil SE Bond yielded the highest shear bond strength values (30.9 ±4.66 MPa) which were statistically significant, followed byTetric N Bond Universal group (29.8 ±4.34) and the lowest shear bond strength values were recorded for Futura Bond DC (18.2 ±3.13). Conclusion: Clearfil SE bond and Tetric N bond Universal can be considered as better options than Futura Bond DC.

scholarly journals Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Bonded to Porcelain Surface using Different Surface Conditioning Methods: An in vitro Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
PV Girish ◽  
Uma Dinesh ◽  
CS Ramachandra Bhat ◽  
Pradeep Chandra Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Ceramic Surfaces

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces using different conditioning methods and to assess the site of bond failure after debonding. Materials and methods A total of 70 ceramic surfaces were produced with uniform shape, size and composition. The samples were divided into 7 groups (each of 10 samples). Group 1 was the control group (untreated surface); in group 2 the surface were roughened with a diamond bur; in group 3 the surface were etched with hydrofluoric acid; in group 4 the surfaces were sandblasted; in group 5 the surfaces roughened with bur and silane applied; in group 6 the surfaces were etched with hydrofluoric acid and silane applied and in group 7 the surfaces were sandblasted and silane applied. To all the above groups, metal orthodontic brackets were bonded with light cure adhesive. The brackets were later stored in artificial saliva and incubated at 37°C (24 hours). The samples were then subjected to shear bond strength test using an Instron universal testing machine. The debonded porcelain surfaces were then studied under stereomicroscope to assess site of bond failure. Results Sandblasting the ceramic surface and silane application showed the highest bond strength. Stereomicroscope examination after debonding showed that the bond failure is at bracket-adhesive interface in four groups namely hydrofluoric acid, sandblasting, hydrofluoric acid with silane and sandblasting with silane. Conclusion Sandblasting with silane combination produced the highest shear bond strength, so it is a clinically suitable method for bonding orthodontic metal brackets onto ceramic surface. Clinical relevance Bonding orthodontic brackets to ceramic crowns of patients has been a tough task. In this study, different conditioning methods were used to treat the ceramic surfaces before bonding. The results showed that sandblasting the ceramic surface prior to application of silane produced the highest shear bond strength which is clinically suitable to reduce bond failures. How to cite this article Girish PV, Dinesh U, Bhat CSR, Shetty PC. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Bonded to Porcelain Surface using Different Surface Conditioning Methods: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(4):487-493.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document