Flat Panel Cone Beam Computed Tomography of the Sinuses

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P77-P78
Author(s):  
Richard A Zoumalan ◽  
Kathryn Shouyee Yung ◽  
Edwin Wang ◽  
Richard A Lebowitz ◽  
Joseph B Jacobs

Objective Flat panel cone beam CT is a relatively new technology that improves upon traditional multidetector CT scanners by generating images with greater spatial resolution at lower radiation doses. 1) Learn whether flat panel cone beam CT evaluation is an effective imaging modality for the sinuses. 2) Learn which doses of radiation provide quality evaluation of the sinuses while exposing the patient to the least amount of radiation. Methods In 2007, a panel consisting of neuroradiologists and otolaryngologists blindly reviewed images from flat panel sinus CTs (Xoran MiniCAT) of 11 live human subjects, each irradiated at all 3 different techniques (denoted as: low dose mAs=9.27, medium dose mAs = 18.41, high dose mAs=36.7) and rated the image quality of a pre-designated list of sinus anatomic structures. Techniques were compared in a pairwise manner using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test. Results Compared to the low dose technique CT scan, the high dose CT scan technique had significantly better image quality (P=.0029) and image noise (P=.0049). Similarly, the medium dose CT scan technique had significantly better image quality (P=.0020) and image noise (P = .0010) compared to the low dose technique. No difference in image quality and image noise existed between the medium and high dose techniques. No difference in visualization of 13 specific anatomic structures existed between any of the dose techniques. Conclusions Lower dose CT techniques achieved by flat panel cone beam CT may be an effective and safe alternative to traditional multidetector CT scanners. This imaging modality may help patients avoid unnecessary radiation to sensitive organs.

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Rose ◽  
Jens Wiegert ◽  
Dirk Schaefer ◽  
Klaus Fiedler ◽  
Norbert Conrads ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 20190495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Durer Iskanderani ◽  
Mats Nilsson ◽  
Per Alstergren ◽  
Xie-Qi Shi ◽  
Kristina Hellen-halme

Objective: Evaluation of cone beam CT (CBCT) examination with a low-dose scanning protocol for assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Methods: 34 adult patients referred for CBCT imaging of the TMJ underwent two examinations with two scanning protocols, a manufacturer-recommended protocol (default) and a low-dose protocol where the tube current was reduced to 20% of the default protocol. Three image stacks were reconstructed: default protocol, low-dose protocol, and processed (using a noise reduction algorithm) low-dose protocol. Four radiologists evaluated the images. The Sign test was used to evaluate visibility of TMJ anatomic structures and image quality. Receiver operating characteristic analyzes were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy. κ values were used to evaluate intraobserver agreement. Results: With the low-dose and processed protocols, visibility of the TMJ anatomical structures and overall image quality were comparable to the default protocol. No significant differences in radiographic findings were found for the two low-dose protocols compared to the default protocol. The area under the curves (Az) averaged for the low-dose and processed protocols, according to all observers, were 0.931 and 0.941, respectively. Intraobserver agreement was good to very good. Conclusion: For the CBCT unit used in this study, the low-dose CBCT protocol for TMJ examination was diagnostically comparable to the manufacturer-recommended protocol, but delivered a five times lower radiation dose. There is an urgent need to evaluate protocols for CBCT examinations of TMJ in order to optimize them for a radiation dose as low as diagnostically acceptable (the as low as diagnostically acceptable principle recommended by NCRP).


2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1115) ◽  
pp. 20200412
Author(s):  
Maria Antonietta Piliero ◽  
Margherita Casiraghi ◽  
Davide Giovanni Bosetti ◽  
Simona Cima ◽  
Letizia Deantonio ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the performance of low dose cone beam CT (CBCT) acquisition protocols for image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Methods: CBCT images of patients undergoing prostate cancer radiotherapy were acquired with the settings currently used in our department and two low dose settings at 50% and 63% lower exposure. Four experienced radiation oncologists and two radiation therapy technologists graded the images on five image quality characteristics. The scores were analysed through Visual Grading Regression, using the acquisition settings and the patient size as covariates. Results: The low dose acquisition settings have no impact on the image quality for patients with body profile length at hip level below 100 cm. Conclusions: A reduction of about 60% of the dose is feasible for patients with size below 100 cm. The visibility of low contrast features can be compromised if using the low dose acquisition settings for patients with hip size above 100 cm. Advances in knowledge: Low dose CBCT acquisition protocols for the pelvis, based on subjective evaluation of patient images.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lambros Tselikas ◽  
Julien Joskin ◽  
Florian Roquet ◽  
Geoffroy Farouil ◽  
Serge Dreuil ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 850-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Lawlor ◽  
Melissa A. Kluczynski ◽  
John M. Marzo

Background: The utility of computed tomography (CT) for measuring medial clear space (MCS) for determination of the stability of supination external rotation (SER) ankle fractures and in comparison to standard radiographs is unknown. We compared MCS on gravity stress (GS) radiographs to GS and weight bearing (WB) cone-beam CT (CBCT). Methods: An AO SER 44B3.1 ankle fracture was simulated in 10 human cadavers, also serving as controls. MCS was measured on GS radiographs, GS CBCT, and a simulated WB CBCT scan. Specimens were stable if MCS was <5 mm and unstable if MCS was ≥5 mm. Paired t tests were used to compare MCS from each imaging modality for controls versus SER injuries and stable versus unstable specimens. Results: Compared with controls assessed by GS radiographs, MCS was greater for an SER injury when assessed by GS radiograph and GS CBCT scan within the stable group. Compared with controls assessed by GS radiographs, MCS was greater for SER injuries when assessed by GS radiograph, GS CBCT scan, and WB CBCT within the unstable group. MCS was reduced for stable versus unstable SER injuries assessed by WB CBCT. Conclusion: In a cadaveric model of SER ankle fracture, the medial clear space was statistically significantly greater for the experimental condition when assessed by gravity stress radiograph and gravity stress CBCT scan. Under weight-bearing conditions, the cone-beam CT scanner distinguished between stable and unstable ankles in the experimental condition. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a WB cone-beam CT scan may be able to distinguish between stable and unstable SER ankle fractures and influence operative decision making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 20170423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romke Rozema ◽  
Michiel HJ Doff ◽  
Peter MA van Ooijen ◽  
Douwe Postmus ◽  
Henriëtte E Westerlaan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document