Humility is associated with less aggressive motivation

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 109837
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Summerell ◽  
Cindy Harmon-Jones ◽  
Thomas F. Denson ◽  
Eddie Harmon-Jones
1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 241-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Baenninger

2010 ◽  
Vol 278 (1713) ◽  
pp. 1873-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Rillich ◽  
Klaus Schildberger ◽  
Paul A. Stevenson

Aggression is a behavioural strategy for securing resources (food, mates and territory) and its expression is strongly influenced by their presence and value. While it is known that resource holders are generally highly aggressive towards intruding consexuals and usually defeat them, the underlying neuronal mechanisms are not known. In a novel intruder–resident paradigm for field crickets ( Gryllus bimaculatus ), we show that otherwise submissive losers of a preceding aggressive encounter readily fight and often defeat aggressive winners after occupying an artificial shelter. This aggression enhancing effect first became evident after 2 min residency, and was maximal after 15 min, but absent 15 min after shelter removal. The residency effect was abolished following non-selective depletion of biogenic amines from the central nervous system using reserpine, or semi-selective depletion of octopamine and dopamine using α-methyl-tyrosine, but not following serotonin depletion using α-methyl-tryptophan. The residency effect was also abolished by the treatment with phentolamine, an α-adrenergic receptor antagonist, or epinastine, a highly selective octopamine receptor blocker, but not by propranolol, a ß-adrenergic receptor antagonist, or by yohimbine, an insect tyramine receptor blocker. We conclude that crickets evaluate residency as a rewarding experience that promotes aggressive motivation via a mechanism involving octopamine, the invertebrate analogue of noradrenaline.


2013 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Linhart ◽  
Pavel Jaška ◽  
Tereza Petrusková ◽  
Adam Petrusek ◽  
Roman Fuchs

1969 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Baenninger ◽  
Marilyn Bergman ◽  
Ronald Baenninger

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. e1500060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Stevenson ◽  
Jan Rillich

Fighting is dangerous, which is why animals choose to flee once the costs outweigh the benefits, but the mechanisms underlying this decision-making process are unknown. By manipulating aggressive signaling and applying nitrergic drugs, we show that the evolutionarily conserved neuromodulator nitric oxide (NO), which has a suppressing effect on aggression in mammals, can play a decisive role. We found that crickets, which exhibit spectacular fighting behavior, flee once the sum of their opponent’s aversive actions accrued during fighting exceeds a critical amount. This effect of aversive experience is mediated by the NO signaling pathway. Rather than suppressing aggressive motivation, NO increases susceptibility to aversive stimuli and with it the likelihood to flee. NO’s effect is manifested in losers by prolonged avoidance behavior, characteristic for social defeat in numerous species. Intriguingly, fighting experience also induces, via NO, a brief susceptible period to aversive stimuli in winners just after victory. Our findings thus reveal a key role for NO in the mechanism underlying the decision to flee and post-conflict depression in aggressive behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document