EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENTS OF SPORTSMANSHIP AND AGGRESSION IN TERMS OF WATER POLO PLAYER POSITIONS

Two commonly used constructs in sport psychology researches are aggression and sportsmanship. In the present research, we attempted to assess the correlations between these two phenomena among male water polo players. The main objective was to explore the differences in aggression in the sport-specific positions of water polo in different aspects - physique, age, etc. - considered. Furthermore, the research sought to demonstrate the inverse relationship between aggression and sportsmanship in a water polo sample. To access these constructs in our research besides the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and the Sportsmanship Attitude Scale a self-formulated water polo specific questionnaire was used, which intended to measure the aggression in the water during water polo matches. From the results, it can be seen that, according to our sample, both the trait aggression of the players and the role determined by their positions in the game play a decisive role when it comes to the aggression of an athlete. Moreover, the results obtained for water polo players also proved that sportsmanship and aggression are two contradictory constructs.

The Tangled Webs We Wreak: Examining the Structure of Aggressive Personality Using Psychometric Networks

Trait aggression is a prominent construct in the psychological literature, yet little work has sought to situate trait aggression among broader frameworks of personality. Initial evidence suggests that trait aggression may be best couched within the nomological network of the Five Factor Model (FFM). The current work sought to locate the most appropriate home for trait aggression among the FFM. We applied a preregistered regimen of psychometric network analyses to three datasets (combined N = 2,927) that contained self-reports of trait aggression and the FFM traits. Trait aggression was highly central in the factor-level networks, which contained associations consistent with the conceptualization of this construct as a lower-order component of low agreeableness. The facet-level networks revealed that the behavioral facets of trait aggression reflected low agreeableness, but that the anger and hostility facets reflected high neuroticism. The item-level network suggested that the intent to initiate aggressive encounters was the primary bridge that empirically linked trait aggression to agreeableness. Our results indicate that trait aggression is primarily a lower-order facet of agreeableness, advance our understanding of trait aggression, integrate it with broader frameworks of personality, and suggest future directions to refine this complex dispositional tendency.

Structural covariance of amygdala subregions is associated with trait aggression and endogenous testosterone in healthy individuals

Many studies point toward volume reductions in the amygdala as a potential neurostructural marker for trait aggression. However, most of these findings stem from clinical samples, rendering unclear whether the findings generalize to non-clinical populations. Furthermore, the notion of neural networks suggests that interregional correlations in grey matter volume (i.e., structural covariance) can explain individual differences in aggressive behavior beyond local univariate associations. Here, we tested whether structural covariance between amygdala subregions and the rest of the brain is associated with self-reported aggression in a large sample of healthy young students (n=263; 51% women). Salivary testosterone concentrations were measured for a subset of n=76 participants (45% women), allowing us to investigate the influence of endogenous testosterone on structural covariance. Aggressive individuals showed enhanced covariance between superficial amygdala (SFA) and dorsal anterior insula (dAI), but lower covariance between laterobasal amygdala (LBA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). These structural patterns overlap with functional networks involved in the genesis and regulation of aggressive behavior, respectively. With increasing endogenous testosterone, we observed stronger structural covariance between centromedial amygdala (CMA) and medial prefrontal cortex in men and between CMA and orbitofrontal cortex in women. These results speak for structural covariance of amygdala subregions as a robust correlate of trait aggression in healthy individuals. Moreover, regions that showed structural covariance with the amygdala modulated by either testosterone or aggression did not overlap, speaking for a more complex role of testosterone in human social behavior rather than the simple assumption that testosterone only increases aggressiveness.

Neurophysiological Evidence for Stress-Related Reductions in Right Frontal Regulatory Control in Trait Aggressive, Violent Prone Men

Trait aggression is a personality characteristic that has been associated with reduced executive function, which includes lack of impulse control and decreased emotional regulation. Reduced performance on tasks measuring executive function has reliably been associated with reduced frontal lobe function. The aim of the current research was to extend the capacity model of hostility developed by Holland et al. [1] to apply to trait aggression. Men obtaining high and low scores on the Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire completed a cognitive and emotional task, and blood pressure measures were taken before and after completion of the tasks. Analysis of the findings indicated that low trait aggressive men evidenced lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) after competing these tasks. Conversely, highly trait aggressive men evidenced significantly higher SBP after completing the same tasks. This indicative of reduced right frontal lobe inhibitory control of the right temporoparietal regions and provides preliminary support for the application of the capacity model to trait aggression.