Laparoscopic pancreatic resection – The new “gold standard” for distal pancreatic resection

Pancreatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 516
Author(s):  
Marek Durlik ◽  
Marta Matejak-Górska ◽  
Anna Nasierowska-Guttmejer ◽  
Ireneusz Ziobrowski
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. A10-A15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinnusamy Palanivelu ◽  
Kyoichi Takaori ◽  
Mohammad Abu Hilal ◽  
David A. Kooby ◽  
Go Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 640-646
Author(s):  
K.G. Valikhnovska

The causes of pancreatic fistula were analyzed in 503 patients aged from 22 to 81who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors. The said patients were operated on during the period from 2008 to 2017. The aim of this study is to improve the outcomes of pancreatic resection based on a retrospective analysis of the risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistulae and the development of a range of measures to prevent the above complication. The influence of factors on the risk of pancreatic fistula was investigated by Pearson method (χ2). The factors contributing to the occurrence of pancreatic fistulae included type of resection (Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy; χ2=8.616,1, p=0.0033, p<0.01), kind of pathology (cancer of the pancreatic head, χ2=7.658,1, p=0.0057, p<0.01), type of pancreaticojejunostomy (invaginative pancreatic duct-jejunostomy; χ2=12.75,1, p<0.001), technique for drainage of the major pancreatic duct (pancreaticojejunostomy on external drainage, χ2=44.01,1, p<0.0001), resection of venous vessels following distal pancreatic resection (χ2=8.350,1, p=0.0039, p<0.01), glycemic level in the preoperative period (P=0.0344,U=15061), the presence of concomitant diseases in patients (χ2=15.62,1, p=0.0001, p<0.001). Preoperative glycemic level and the presence of concomitant diseases in patients are factors that can be influenced to prevent the onset of pancreatic fistula in the postoperative period in patients who are scheduled for pancreatic resection. Prevention of this complication involves the correction of glycemic level and treatment of concomitant pathology in patients in the preoperative period.


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 954-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo A. Guzman ◽  
Rebecca A Nelson ◽  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Alessio Pigazzi ◽  
Vijay Trisal ◽  
...  

Pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity after distal pancreatic resection. When resections are performed with linear stapling devices, the use of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement has been suggested to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula. Our objective was to investigate the incidence of pancreatic fistula when using the Gore Seamguard® staple line reinforcement in stapled distal pancreatic resections. A retrospective review of 30 consecutive patients with stapled distal pancreatectomy was conducted. A broad definition of pancreatic fistula was used. Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were compared between groups. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in 11 of 15 patients (73%) and three of 15 patients (20%) in the Seamguard® and non-Seamguard® groups, respectively ( P = 0.002). Pancreatic parenchymal transection at the neck of the gland was associated with pancreatic fistula, whereas laparoscopic procedures, splenic preservation, or additional organ resection were not. On multivariate analysis, the association between Seamguard® use and pancreatic fistula was significant ( P = 0.005). In conclusion, after introduction of the Gore Seamguard® bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement, we experienced a significant increase in the rate of pancreatic fistula. This experience raises concern about the efficacy of this device in limiting pancreatic fistula after stapled distal pancreatic resection.


Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. S38
Author(s):  
D.L. Chen ◽  
X. Liang ◽  
A.A. Liu ◽  
L. Tang ◽  
C.H. Shao

Pancreatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 531
Author(s):  
Safi Dokmak ◽  
Béatrice Aussilhou ◽  
Fadhel Samir Ftériche ◽  
Benjamin Blanc ◽  
Philippe Lévy ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wagner ◽  
B. Gloor ◽  
M. Ambühl ◽  
M. Worni ◽  
J. A. Lutz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 831-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Xourafas ◽  
Ali Tavakkoli ◽  
Thomas E. Clancy ◽  
Stanley W. Ashley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document