Effect of using a wearable device on clinical decision-making and motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease starting transdermal rotigotine patch: A pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart H. Isaacson ◽  
Babak Boroojerdi ◽  
Olga Waln ◽  
Martha McGraw ◽  
David L. Kreitzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Wearable Device ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Rotigotine Patch

scholarly journals Lessons Learned: Conducting Cases of Manualized, Telephone-Based, Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Depression in Parkinson’s Disease (dPD)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-131
Author(s):  
Logan Durland
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Behavioral Treatment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Recent Experience

My current clinical practice has been shifted to a telehealth format for the last three months due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and it seems an apt moment to reexamine my participation in Dr. Roseanne Dobkin’s research on manualized telehealth therapy for depression in Parkinson’s disease patients (dPD), using a protocol titled "Teleheath Guided Self-Help for dPD," or "TH-GSH-dPD," for short (Dobkin et al., 2020). My participation involved, in part, being the therapist in  four case studies I have written about with "Alice," "Carl," "Ethan," and "Gary" (Durland, 2020). In these case studies, a subset of those in Dr. Dobkin’s group studies, I explored my clinical decision-making, seeking insight into how best to flexibly apply the dPD protocol to meet the needs of a heterogeneous clinical population. Here, my aim is to recontextualize and expand on the conclusions of my four case studies, based on my dissertation and conducted over three years ago (Durland, 2017), in light of both my recent experience providing mental health services and the Commentaries on the four case studies so perceptively contributed by Dr. Dobkin and her colleagues (Mann, Miller, St. Hill, Dobkin, 2020) and by Liza Pincus (2020). In particular, I will focus first on (a) continuing the analysis of clinical decision-making involved in the case studies described in my earlier article (Duland, 2020); and then on (b) general issues related to the delivery of telehealth treatment.

The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson's disease: Results from an international pilot study

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 1901-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kallol Ray Chaudhuri ◽  
Pablo Martinez-Martin ◽  
Richard G. Brown ◽  
Kapil Sethi ◽  
Fabrizio Stocchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Metric Properties ◽  
Non Motor Symptoms

Dentists clinical decision-making for erosive tooth wear: An online pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 103424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micah B. Goldfarb ◽  
Gerardo Maupomé ◽  
Adam T. Hirsh ◽  
Joana C. Carvalho ◽  
George J. Eckert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tooth Wear ◽  
Erosive Tooth Wear
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document