Haptic perception of verticality correlates with postural and balance deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Mori ◽  
Martina Putzolu ◽  
Gaia Bonassi ◽  
Giovanni Galeoto ◽  
Susanna Mezzarobba ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-112
Author(s):  
Gustavo José Luvizutto ◽  
Thanielle Souza Silva Brito ◽  
Eduardo de Moura Neto ◽  
Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza

Difficulties in the integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) may alter perception of verticality. Accordingly, in this cross-sectional study, we analyzed PD patients’ ( n = 13) subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic vertical (SHV) perceptions and compared them to those of healthy controls ( n = 14). We compared SVV and SHV findings among participants with PD, healthy controls, and cutoff points of normality based on prior research literature, using the parametric nonpaired t test (at p < .05) and Cohen’s d (at d > 0.8) to determine clinical relevance. We analyzed SVV with the bucket test and SHV with the rod rotations task in clockwise and counterclockwise directions. We calculated Pearson correlations to analyze the association between verticality tests and the most clinically affected body side. We calculated both the percentage of A-effect (expression of body tilt underestimation to the midline) and E-effect (expression of body tilt overestimation in the upright position). Individuals with PD showed greater variability in right SHV supination compared to the healthy control participants ( p = .002). There was greater clinical relevance in right (as opposed to left) SVV ( d = 0.83), right (as opposed to left) SHV pronation ( d = 0.91), and left (as opposed to right) SHV pronation ( d = 0.88). We observed a higher proportion of E-effect in individuals with PD. A significantly higher proportion of patients with PD, compared to patients in past literature, had right SHV pronation ( p = .001), left SHV pronation ( p = .023), right SHV supination ( p = .001), left SHV supination ( p = .046), and left SHV pronation ( p = .046). Thus, subjective visual and proprioceptive perception of verticality is altered in patients with PD, compared to individuals without PD.


Neuroscience ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 340 ◽  
pp. 436-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaylena A. Ehgoetz Martens ◽  
Shannon C. Lefaivre ◽  
Eric N. Beck ◽  
Rebecca Chow ◽  
Frederico Pieruccini-Faria ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu‐Ting Shen ◽  
Jian‐Wei Wang ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Yan Zhi ◽  
Jun‐Yi Li ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e2625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Konczak ◽  
Kuan-yi Li ◽  
Paul J. Tuite ◽  
Howard Poizner

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie A. King ◽  
Kelsey C. Priest ◽  
Arash Salarian ◽  
Don Pierce ◽  
Fay B. Horak

Objective. The purpose of this study was to explore the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest compared to the Berg Balance Scale in evaluating balance in people with PD of varying severity. We evaluated (1) the distribution of patients scores to look for ceiling effects, (2) concurrent validity with severity of disease, and (3) the sensitivity/specificity of separating people with or without postural response deficits.Subjects. Ninety-seven people with PD were tested for balance deficits using the Berg, Mini-BESTest, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III and the Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) disease severity classification.Setting. Clinical research facility at Oregon Health & Science University.Results. The Mini-BESTest is highly correlated with the Berg (r=0.79,P<0.001), but avoids the ceiling compression effect of the Berg for mild PD (skewness −2.30 Berg, −0.93 Mini-BESTest). Consequently, the Mini-BESTest is more effective than the Berg for predicting UPDRS Motor score (P<0.001Mini-BESTest versusP=0.86Berg), and for discriminating between those with and without postural response deficits as measured by the H&Y (ROC differentialP=0.06).Conclusion. The Mini-BESTest is a promising tool for discerning balance deficits in patients with PD, most importantly those with more subtle deficits.


Brain ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 135 (11) ◽  
pp. 3371-3379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Konczak ◽  
Alessandra Sciutti ◽  
Laura Avanzino ◽  
Valentina Squeri ◽  
Monica Gori ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1023
Author(s):  
Shannon C. Lefaivre ◽  
Matt J. N. Brown ◽  
Quincy J. Almeida

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document