scholarly journals Parental expectations of support from healthcare providers during pediatric life-threatening illness: A secondary, qualitative analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 163-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Mooney-Doyle ◽  
Maiara Rodrigues dos Santos ◽  
Regina Szylit ◽  
Janet A. Deatrick
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Lynn-McHale Wiegand

• Background Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in intensive care units is increasing. Patients’ families are intimately involved in this process because the patients are usually unable to participate. Little is known about family members’ interactions with healthcare providers and the healthcare system during this process.• Objective To describe the interactions between patients’ family members, healthcare providers, and the healthcare system during withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy after a sudden, unexpected illness or injury.• Methods The investigation was part of a larger interpretative phenomenological study. Nineteen families (56 family members) who participated in the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for a family member were interviewed and observed. An inductive approach to data analysis was used to discover units of meaning, clusters, and categories.• Results The families’ experiences involved a variety of dimensions, including issues with healthcare providers (bonds and consistency with nurses and physicians, physicians’ presence, information, coordination of care, family meetings, sensitivity to time, and preparation for the dying process) and issues with the healthcare system (parking, struggles with finding privacy, and transfers of patients).• Conclusions Patients’ families need information, guidance, and support as the families participate in the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. The results of this study have important implications for clinical practice and future research.


Save My Kid ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 3-23
Author(s):  
Amanda M. Gengler

Since families with critically ill children have different resources available to them, they take different approaches to managing their child’s life-threatening illness. The author introduces basic concepts that are analyzed over the course of the book, including care-captaining, which involves working hard to influence the course of their child’s treatment, and care-entrusting, which involves deferring to the judgement of their child’s healthcare providers. Additionally, the chapter covers the topic of healthcare inequality and cultural health capital, emotions and the reproduction of inequality in family life, and more.


1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 906-906
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence G. Calhoun ◽  
◽  
Jay Azarow ◽  
Tzipi Weiss ◽  
Joel Millam

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Philip Berry

When life-threatening illness robs a patient of the ability to express their desires, medical personnel must work through the issues of management and prognosis with relatives. Management decisions are guided by medical judgement and the relatives’ account of the patient’s wishes, but difficulties occur when distance grows between these two factors. In these circumstances the counselling process may turn into a doctor-led justification of the medical decision. This article presents two strands of dialogue, in which a doctor, counselling for and against continuation of supportive treatment in two patients with liver failure, demonstrates selectivity and inconsistency in constructing an argument. The specific issues of loss of consciousness (with obscuration of personal identity), statistical ‘futility’ and removal of autonomy are explored and used to bolster diametrically opposed medical decisions. By examining the doctor’s ability to interpret these issues according to circumstance, the author demonstrates how it is possible to shade medical facts depending on the desired outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Robin Cohen ◽  
Lara B. Russell ◽  
Anne Leis ◽  
Javad Shahidi ◽  
Pat Porterfield ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Domains other than those commonly measured (physical, psychological, social, and sometimes existential/spiritual) are important to the quality of life of people with life-threatening illness. The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) – Revised measures the four common domains. The aim of this study was to create a psychometrically sound instrument, MQOL – Expanded, to comprehensively measure quality of life by adding to MQOL-Revised the domains of cognition, healthcare, environment, (feeling like a) burden, and possibly, finance. Methods Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on three datasets to ascertain whether seven new items belonged with existing MQOL-Revised domains, whether good model fit was obtained with their addition as five separate domains to MQOL-Revised, and whether a second-order factor representing overall quality of life was present. People with life-threatening illnesses (mainly cancer) or aged > 80 were recruited from 15 healthcare sites in seven Canadian provinces. Settings included: palliative home care and inpatient units; acute care units; oncology outpatient clinics. Results Good model fit was obtained when adding each of the five domains separately to MQOL-Revised and for the nine correlated domains. Fit was acceptable for a second-order factor model. The financial domain was removed because of low importance. The resulting MQOL-Expanded is a 21-item instrument with eight domains (fit of eight correlated domains: Comparative Fit Index = .96; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .033). Conclusions MQOL-Expanded builds on MQOL-Revised to more comprehensively measure the quality of life of people with life-threatening illness. Our analyses provide validity evidence for the MQOL-Expanded domain and summary scores; the need for further validation research is discussed. Use of MQOL-Expanded will enable a more holistic understanding of the quality of life of people with a life-threatening illness and the impact of treatments and interventions upon it. It will allow for a better understanding of less commonly assessed but important life domains (cognition, healthcare, environment, feeling like a burden) and their relationship to the more commonly assessed domains (physical, psychological, social, existential/spiritual).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document