Evaluating the Quality of Pain Management in a Hospital Setting: Testing the Psychometric Properties of the Icelandic Version of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigridur Zoëga ◽  
Sandra Ward ◽  
Sigridur Gunnarsdottir
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
American Pain Society

The Quality Test for Postoperative Pain Management using the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire Revisied (APS-POQ-R) version Indonesia at Mohammad Hoesin Hospital in Palembang (A study of the quality level of postoperative pain management

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Malina Resta Maria Panjaitan ◽  
Dewi Arsinta ◽  
Rose Mafiana
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Emotional Experience ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Quality Level ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Post Operative Pain

A B S T R A C TPain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual orpotential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. APS-POQ-R (RevisedAmerican Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire) is a measuring tool for assessingthe quality of postoperative pain management by exploring patient experiences andoutcomes. This research aims to assess the quality of postoperative pain managementat Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang and to determine the factors that influenceit. The Cross-sectional observational analytic study was conducted toward 51respondents. Data was collected primarily by using questionnares and interview. Datawas analyzed by using chi-square. The study showed that the quality of postoperativepain management at RSUP Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang has goodquality with a total of 27 patients (52.9%). From statistical analysis there wassignificant relationship between the quality of post-operative pain management withage (p=0,037), gender (p=0,027), ethnicity (p=0,039), education level (p=0,039), andeconomic level (p=0,005). So it can be concluded that was a significant relationshipbetween the quality of post-operative pain management with age, gender, ethnicity,education level, and economic level.

scholarly journals Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Schultz ◽  
Ulla Skræp ◽  
Tanja Schultz Larsen ◽  
Lise Ewald Rekvad ◽  
Jette Littau-Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Acute Abdominal Pain ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
American Pain Society ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background and aims This paper forms part of a study evaluating the effect of patient-controlled oral analgesia for patients admitted to hospital with acute abdominal pain. Pain is a subjective experience, and a multifaceted evaluation tool concerning patient-reported outcome measures is needed to monitor, evaluate, and guide health care professionals in the quality of pain management. The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) is a validated multifaceted evaluation tool for measuring patient-reported pain experiences to evaluate different pain management interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a modified Danish version of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) used during and after hospitalization for patients with acute abdominal pain. Methods The APS-POQ-R was translated into Danish and two slightly different questionnaires were formed. Questionnaire one had 39 items and the six subscales pain severity (pain), perception of care (satisfaction), pain interference with function (activity) and emotions (emotion), side effects of treatment (safety), and patient-related barriers to pain management. The questionnaire focused on time during hospital stay and was to be completed at discharge. Questionnaire two included 25 items and the five subscales pain, satisfaction, activity, emotion, and safety and focused on time at home and was to be completed daily 1 week after discharge. The questionnaires were tested on 156 patients with acute abdominal pain. Internal consistency reliability and construct validity was examined. Results In both questionnaires, the results of correlations and tests for internal consistency reliability showed a Cronbach’s alpha of >0.7 for the pain, activity, and emotion subscales, but the value was ≥0.69 for the satisfaction subscale. In questionnaire one, Cronbach’s alpha was ≤0.64 for the safety subscale, but this was 0.73 when the item “itching” was deleted. In questionnaire two, Cronbach’s alpha was ≤0.51 for the safety subscale. For the patient-barrier subscale in questionnaire one, Cronbach’s alpha was ≤0.62 for any combination of the items in the subscale. The results of the construct validity and factor analysis showed a five-factor structure in questionnaire one and a three-factor structure in questionnaire two. In questionnaire one, items from the pain, activity, emotion, and safety subscales, except for the items “least pain” and “itching,” loaded on factor one. In questionnaire two, all items from the pain, activity, and emotion subscales loaded on factor one. Conclusions The modified APS-POQ-R-D demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for the five subscales pain severity (pain), perception of care (satisfaction), pain interference with function (activity) and emotions (emotion), side effects of treatment (safety), but not for the patient-barrier subscale for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain. Consequently, the APS-POQ-R-D may be used without the patient-barrier subscale. Implications The clinical implications of this study may help clinicians with investigating how acute patients manage pain during and after hospital admission.

scholarly journals Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e045245
Author(s):  
Carmen J E M van der Mark ◽  
Hester Vermeulen ◽  
Paul H J Hendriks ◽  
Catharina J van Oostveen
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Workforce Planning ◽  
Nurse Staffing ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Factors Influencing

BackgroundMatching demand and supply in nursing work continues to generate debate. Current approaches focus on objective measures, such as nurses per occupied bed or patient classification. However, staff numbers do not tell the whole staffing story. The subjective measure of nurses’ perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) has the potential to enhance nurse staffing methods in a way that goes beyond traditional workload measurement or workforce planning methods.ObjectivesTo detect outcomes associated with nurses’ PAS and the factors that influence PAS and to review the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure PAS in a hospital setting.Design and methodsA scoping review was performed to identify outcomes associated with PAS, factors influencing PAS and instruments measuring PAS. A search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Business Source Complete and Embase databases identified 2609 potentially relevant articles. Data were independently extracted, analysed and synthesised. The quality of studies describing influencing factors or outcomes of PAS and psychometric properties of instruments measuring PAS were assessed following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality appraisal checklist and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines.ResultsSixty-three studies were included, describing 60 outcomes of PAS, 79 factors influencing PAS and 21 instruments measuring PAS. In general, positive PAS was related to positive outcomes for the patient, nurse and organisation, supporting the relevance of PAS as a staffing measure. We identified a variety of factors that influence PAS, including demand for care, nurse supply and organisation of care delivery. Associations between these factors and PAS were inconsistent. The quality of studies investigating the development and evaluation of instruments measuring PAS was moderate.ConclusionsMeasuring the PAS may enhance nurse staffing methods in a hospital setting. Further work is needed to refine and psychometrically evaluate instruments for measuring PAS.

scholarly journals American Pain Society Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Acute and Cancer Pain Management

2005 ◽  
Vol 165 (14) ◽  
pp. 1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra B. Gordon ◽  
June L. Dahl ◽  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Bill McCarberg ◽  
Knox H. Todd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Cancer Pain Management ◽  
American Pain Society

scholarly journals Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sook Hui Chaw ◽  
Yoke Lin Lo ◽  
Jia Yin Lee ◽  
Jia Wing Wong ◽  
Wan Aizat Wan Zakaria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Perception Of Care

Abstract Background The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. A validated APS-POQ-R is pivotal to guide effective pain management with better patient satisfaction. Previous studies revealed that subscales of “patients’ perception of pain management” were unstable cross-culturally. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R in gynecological postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background using confirmatory factor analysis to allow comparisons among different a priori models at the latent factor level. Methods Patients aged 18 years old or above and who were scheduled for gynecology surgery were selected. Three different models with a combination of latent factors were based on a priori hypotheses from previous studies. The root-mean-squared error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, Chi-squared test, and change in Chi-squared statistic given a change in degrees of freedom between models were used to assess the model fit to the present data. Results A total of 302 patients completed the questionnaire. The five-factor model which was based on Gordon’s study has an acceptable fit for the data and was superior when compared to the one-factor baseline model. Although the four-factor model, which originated from Botti’s study, also demonstrates a good model fit, the “perception of care” construct was excluded in this model. The “perception of care” construct is conceptually important as patient-centered care has become the focus of quality improvement of pain service. Conclusions The APS-POQ-R is easy to administer and is useful for quality evaluation in postoperative pain management. The present study demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the APS-POQ-R is the best fitting model in our patient sample. The results of this study provide further evidence to support the use of APS-POQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document