Determining minimum fluidization velocity in magnetized fluidized bed with Geldart-B particles

Author(s):  
Quanhong Zhu ◽  
Libo Zhang ◽  
Weikang Hao
2020 ◽  
pp. 127965
Author(s):  
Yanjiao Li ◽  
Chenyang Zhou ◽  
Guannan Lv ◽  
Yongxin Ren ◽  
Yuemin Zhao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David R. Escudero ◽  
Theodore J. Heindel

Characterizing the hydrodynamics of a fluidized bed is of vital importance to understand the behavior of these multiphase flow systems. Minimum fluidization velocity and gas holdup are two important factors used to understand the hydrodynamics of a fluidized bed. Experimental studies on the effects of bed height on the minimum fluidization velocity and gas holdup were carried out using a 10.2 cm diameter cylindrical fluidized bed filled with 500–600 μm glass beads. In this study, four different bed height-to-diameter ratios were used: H/D = 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2. Minimum fluidization velocity was determined for each H/D ratio using pressure drop measurements. Local time-average gas holdup was determined using non-invasive X-ray computed tomography imaging. Results show that minimum fluidization velocity is not affected by the change in bed height, while local gas holdup does appear to be affected by the change in bed height.


POROS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asyari Daryus Daryus

The gas fluidization velocity or superficial gas velocity entering the fluidized bed will affect the fluidization in fluidized bed. If the superficial velocity is below the minimum fluidization velocity then there is no fluidization, and if it is more than it should be then the fluidization characteristic will be different. To obtain the effect of gas fluidization velocity to fluidization characteristics, it had been conducted the research on lab scale fluidized bed using CFD simulation method validated with the experiment data. The simulations used Gidaspow model for drag force and k-ε model for turbulent flow. From the experiments obtained that the minimum fluidization velocity was 0.4 m/s and the pressure drop was around 700 Pa. The simulation results for pressure drop across the bed were close to the experiment data for the gas fluidization velocity equal and bigger than the minimum fluidization velocity. For the velocity below the minimum fluidization velocity, there was the big differences between the simulation results and the experiment, so the simulation results cannot be used. For the fluidization velocity of 0.4 m/s and 0.45 m/s, fluidized bed showed the bubbling phenomena, and the higher velocity showed the bigger bubble. For the fluidization velocity of 0.50 m/s to 0.70 m/s, the fluidized bed showed the turbulent regime. In this regime, the bubble was breaking instead of growing and there was no clear bed surface observed. The simulation result for particle density showed that if the gas velocity was higher, the density of particles at the base of bed was decreasing since many of the particles was moving upwards. The particle density was lower in this regime than that of bubbling regime.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (15) ◽  
pp. 2183-2187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foong Chee Woh ◽  
Jidon Janaun ◽  
Auti Prabhakar ◽  
Kamatam Krishnaiah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document