scholarly journals A Process Capability Analysis Method Using Adjusted Modified Sample Entropy

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 122-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siim Koppel ◽  
Shing I. Chang
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianguang Kong ◽  
Shing I. Chang ◽  
Zheng Zhang

As manufacturing systems become increasingly complex, manufacturing enterprises face the challenging need for precise, effective process capability analyses. However, acquisition of process data, characterized by larger volume and complexity, is much easier, consequently making process capability analysis more difficult. Traditional process capability analysis methods such as Cp or Cpk are not adequate for large volume process data collected over time because these methods assume that process distribution remains unchanged. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to explore the use of sample entropy (SampEn) as it relates to univariate process capability analysis. The proposed method, which alleviates the fixed distribution assumption, can identify changing process variations over time. We proposed a novel method based on Adjusted Sample Entropy (AdSEn) to quantify process variation changes. A study based on simulation data sets showed that the proposed method provides adequate process capability information.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
pp. 531-534
Author(s):  
Maja Rujnić-Sokele ◽  
Mladen Šercer ◽  
Damir Godec

Author(s):  
Stoyan Stoyanov ◽  
Ying Kit Tang ◽  
Chris Bailey ◽  
Robert Evans ◽  
Silvia Marson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1477-1482
Author(s):  
O.F. Odeyinka ◽  
F.O. Ogunwolu ◽  
O.P. Popoola ◽  
T.O. Oyedokun

Process capability analysis combines statistical tools and control charts with good engineering judgment to interpret and analyze the data representing a process. This work analyzes the process capability of a polypropylene bag producing company. The case study organization uses two plants for production and data was collected over a period of nine months for this study. Analysis showed that the output spread of plant 1 was greater than the specification interval spread which implies poor capability. There are non-conforming parts below the Lower Specification Limit (LSL: 500,000 metres) and above the Upper Specification Limit (USL: 600,000 metres) and that the output requires improvement. Similarly, the capability analysis of plant 2 shows that the overall output spread is greater than the specification interval spread (poor capability). The output centre in the specification and overall interval are vertically aligned, thus specifying that the output from plant 2 is also process centered and requires improvement. Recommendations were made to improve the outputs from each production plant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document