Amygdala responses to masked and low spatial frequency fearful faces: a preliminary fMRI study in panic disorder

2012 ◽  
Vol 203 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Ottaviani ◽  
Daniela Cevolani ◽  
Valeria Nucifora ◽  
Rosita Borlimi ◽  
Raffaele Agati ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Chechko ◽  
M Czisch ◽  
A Erhardt ◽  
D Hoehn ◽  
R Wehrle ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
T. Pattyn ◽  
L. Schmaal ◽  
F. Van Den Eede ◽  
L. Cassiers ◽  
BW Penninx ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Via ◽  
Narcís Cardoner ◽  
Jesús Pujol ◽  
Pino Alonso ◽  
Marina López-Solà ◽  
...  

BackgroundDespite knowledge of amygdala involvement in fear and anxiety, its contribution to the pathophysiology of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) remains controversial. In the context of neuroimaging studies, it seems likely that the heterogeneity of the disorder might have contributed to a lack of consistent findings.AimsTo assess the influence of OCD symptom dimensions on amygdala responses to a well-validated emotional face-matching paradigm.MethodCross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of 67 patients with OCD and 67 age-, gender- and education-level matched healthy controls.ResultsThe severity of aggression/checking and sexual/religious symptom dimensions were significantly associated with heightened amygdala activation in those with OCD when responding to fearful faces, whereas no such correlations were seen for other symptom dimensions.ConclusionsAmygdala functional alterations in OCD appear to be specifically modulated by symptom dimensions whose origins may be more closely linked to putative amygdala-centric processes, such as abnormal fear processing.


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Pourtois ◽  
Elise S. Dan ◽  
Didier Grandjean ◽  
David Sander ◽  
Patrik Vuilleumier

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Reinecke ◽  
Alecia Nickless ◽  
Michael Browning ◽  
Catherine J. Harmer

AbstractObjectiveDrugs targeting the N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) system and the ability to learn new associations have been proposed as potential adjunct treatments to boost the success of exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. However, the effects of the NMDA partial agonist d-cycloserine on psychological treatment have been mixed. We investigated potential neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of d-cycloserine-augmented exposure, to inform the optimal combination of this and similar agents with psychological treatment.MethodsUnmedicated patients with panic disorder were randomised to single-dose d-cycloserine (250mg; N=17) or matching placebo (N=16) 2hrs before one session of exposure therapy. Neurocognitive markers were assessed one day after treatment, including reaction-time based threat bias for fearful faces and amygdala response to threat. Clinical symptom severity was measured using self-report and clinician-rated scales the day before and after treatment, and at 1- and 6-months follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.ResultsOne day after treatment, threat bias for fearful faces and amygdala threat response were attenuated in the drug compared to the placebo group. Lower amygdala magnitude predicted greater clinical improvement during follow-up across groups. D-cycloserine led to greater clinical recovery at 1-month follow-up (d-cycloserine 71% versus placebo 25%).DiscussionD-cycloserine-augmented single-session exposure therapy reduces amygdala threat response, and this effect predicts later clinical response. These findings highlight a neurocognitive mechanism by which d-cycloserine may exert its augmentative effects on psychological treatment and bring forward a marker that may help understand and facilitate future development of adjunct treatments with CBT for anxiety disorders. (D-cycloserine Augmented CBT for Panic Disorder; clinicaltrials.gov;NCT01680107)


2020 ◽  
Vol 177 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbo Yang ◽  
Ulrike Lueken ◽  
Jan Richter ◽  
Alfons Hamm ◽  
André Wittmann ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gewnhi Park ◽  
Jay J. Van Bavel ◽  
Michael W. Vasey ◽  
Eric J.L. Egan ◽  
Julian F. Thayer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document