scholarly journals COVID-19 psychiatric patients: Impact of variability in testing on length of hospital stay and disposition back to congregate care settings

2020 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 113324
Author(s):  
Hun Millard ◽  
Cynthia Wilson ◽  
Frank Fortunati ◽  
Luming Li
Author(s):  
Antonia Furegato ◽  
◽  
Jair Santos ◽  
Antonio Júnior ◽  
Renata Oliveira

1970 ◽  
Vol 35 (1, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
Benjamin F. McNeal ◽  
Roy Johnston ◽  
Victor A. Aspromonte

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Salib

Emergency detention of psychiatric patients by doctors under s. 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 is not always preceded by the use of nurses' holding power under s. 5(4). In this review of patients in North Cheshire, all applications of s. 5(4), allowing the emergency detention of voluntary in-patients by registered psychiatric nurses for a maximum period of six hours, were reviewed to examine the extent of its use and to assess its effect on s. 5(2) outcome. Of the 877 detentions under s. 5(2) implemented during the 11-year review period, 140 (16%) were preceded by s. 5(4). There was no significant difference in age, sex, clinical diagnosis, day of the week, reason for detention and length of hospital stay before section application between those who had s. 5(4) applied before 5(2) and those who did not. The latter were less likely to be converted to other sections (53%) compared to a much higher rate of 80% if s. 5(4) preceded s. 5(2). The review has also found that time of section application and length of hospital stay prior to detention may have influenced the use of nurses' holding power. It suggests that s. 5(4) may be a useful predictor of s. 5(2) outcome.


1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kato ◽  
Igor I Galynker ◽  
Christian R Miner ◽  
Jennifer L Rosenblum

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.


2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (51) ◽  
pp. 2028-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Hallay ◽  
Dániel Nagy ◽  
Béla Fülesdi

Malnutrition in hospitalised patients has a significant and disadvantageous impact on treatment outcome. If possible, enteral nutrition with an energy/protein-balanced nutrient should be preferred depending on the patient’s condition, type of illness and risk factors. The aim of the nutrition therapy is to increase the efficacy of treatment and shorten the length of hospital stay in order to ensure rapid rehabilitation. In the present review the authors summarize the most important clinical and practical aspects of enteral nutrition therapy. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(51), 2028–2033.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document