Effects of normative feedback on motor learning are dependent on the frequency of knowledge of results

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 101950
Author(s):  
Ricardo Drews ◽  
Matheus Maia Pacheco ◽  
Flavio Henrique Bastos ◽  
Go Tani
1993 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Cauraugh ◽  
Dapeng Chen ◽  
Steven J. Radio

1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Lee ◽  
Heather Carnahan

1975 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack A. Adams ◽  
Daniel Gopher ◽  
Gavan Lintern

A self paced linear positioning task was used to study the effects of visual and proprioceptive feedback on learning and performance. Subjects were trained with knowledge of results (KR) and tested without it. The analysis of the absolute error scores of the no-KR trials is discussed in this paper. Visual feedback was the more effective source of sensory feedback, but proprioceptive feedback was also effective. An observation that the response did not become independent of sensory feedback as a result of learning, was interpreted as supporting Adams closed loop theory of motor learning in preference to the motor program hypothesis. Other data showed that the presence of visual feedback during learning could inhibit the later effectiveness of proprioceptive feedback.


NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. S394
Author(s):  
Ryuta Kawashima ◽  
Nobumoto Tajima ◽  
Hajime Yoshida ◽  
Katsuo Okita ◽  
Takeo Sasaki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bárbara P. Ferreira ◽  
Leandro F. Malloy-Diniz ◽  
Juliana O. Parma ◽  
Nathálya G. H. M. Nogueira ◽  
Tércio Apolinário-Souza ◽  
...  

Many studies have attributed self-controlled feedback benefits associated with motor learning to learners' greater information processing during practice. However, individual learner characteristics like their impulsivity can also influence how people engage cognitively during learning. We investigated possible dissociations between the types of interaction in self-controlled knowledge of results (KR) and learner impulsivity levels in learning a sequential motor task. Ninety volunteers responded to the self-restraint section of the Barkley deficits in executive functioning scale, and those 60 participants with the highest ( n = 30) and lowest ( n = 30) impulsivity scores practiced a motor task involving sequential pressing of four keys in predetermined absolute and relative times. We further divided participants into four experimental groups by assigning the high- and low-impulsivity groups to two forms of KR—self-controlled absolute and yoked. Study results showed no interaction effect between impulsivity and self-controlled KR, and, contrary to expectation, self-controlled KR did not benefit learning, independently of impulsivity. However, low-impulsivity participants performed better than high-impulsivity participants on the absolute dimension of the transfer task, while high-impulsivity learners were better at the relative dimension. Cognitive characteristics of automatic and reflexive processing were expressed by the strategies used to direct attention to relative and absolute task dimensions, respectively. Low-impulsivity learners switched their attention to both dimensions at the end of practice, while high-impulsivity learners did not switch their attention or directed it only to the relative dimension at the end of the practice. These results suggest that the cognitive styles of high- and low-impulsive learners differentially favor learning distinct dimensions of a motor task, regardless of self-controlled KR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document