scholarly journals Social motility in African trypanosomes: fact or model?

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Bastin ◽  
Brice Rotureau
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e1000739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Oberholzer ◽  
Miguel A. Lopez ◽  
Bryce T. McLelland ◽  
Kent L. Hill

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Lopez ◽  
Edwin A. Saada ◽  
Kent L. Hill

ABSTRACTSophisticated systems for cell-cell communication enable unicellular microbes to act as multicellular entities capable of group-level behaviors that are not evident in individuals. These group behaviors influence microbe physiology, and the underlying signaling pathways are considered potential drug targets in microbial pathogens.Trypanosoma bruceiis a protozoan parasite that causes substantial human suffering and economic hardship in some of the most impoverished regions of the world.T. bruceilives on host tissue surfaces during transmission through its tsetse fly vector, and cultivation on surfaces causes the parasites to assemble into multicellular communities in which individual cells coordinate their movements in response to external signals. This behavior is termed “social motility,” based on its similarities with surface-induced social motility in bacteria, and it demonstrates that trypanosomes are capable of group-level behavior. Mechanisms governingT. bruceisocial motility are unknown. Here we report that a subset of receptor-type adenylate cyclases (ACs) in the trypanosome flagellum regulate social motility. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of adenylate cyclase 6 (AC6), or dual knockdown of AC1 and AC2, causes a hypersocial phenotype but has no discernible effect on individual cells in suspension culture. Mutation of the AC6 catalytic domain phenocopies AC6 knockdown, demonstrating that loss of adenylate cyclase activity is responsible for the phenotype. Notably, knockdown of other ACs did not affect social motility, indicating segregation of AC functions. These studies reveal interesting parallels in systems that control social behavior in trypanosomes and bacteria and provide insight into a feature of parasite biology that may be exploited for novel intervention strategies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e1004493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Imhof ◽  
Sebastian Knüsel ◽  
Kapila Gunasekera ◽  
Xuan Lan Vu ◽  
Isabel Roditi

mBio ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Oberholzer ◽  
Edwin A. Saada ◽  
Kent L. Hill

ABSTRACT The protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei engages in surface-induced social behavior, termed social motility, characterized by single cells assembling into multicellular groups that coordinate their movements in response to extracellular signals. Social motility requires sensing and responding to extracellular signals, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Here we report that T. brucei social motility depends on cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling systems in the parasite's flagellum (synonymous with cilium). Pharmacological inhibition of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE) completely blocks social motility without impacting the viability or motility of individual cells. Using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensor to monitor cAMP dynamics in live cells, we demonstrate that this block in social motility correlates with an increase in intracellular cAMP levels. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of the flagellar PDEB1 phenocopies pharmacological PDE inhibition, demonstrating that PDEB1 is required for social motility. Using parasites expressing distinct fluorescent proteins to monitor individuals in a genetically heterogeneous community, we found that the social motility defect of PDEB1 knockdowns is complemented by wild-type parasites in trans. Therefore, PDEB1 knockdown cells are competent for social motility but appear to lack a necessary factor that can be provided by wild-type cells. The combined data demonstrate that the role of cyclic nucleotides in regulating microbial social behavior extends to African trypanosomes and provide an example of transcomplementation in parasitic protozoa. IMPORTANCE In bacteria, studies of cell-cell communication and social behavior have profoundly influenced our understanding of microbial physiology, signaling, and pathogenesis. In contrast, mechanisms underlying social behavior in protozoan parasites are mostly unknown. Here we show that social behavior in the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei is governed by cyclic-AMP signaling systems in the flagellum, with intriguing parallels to signaling systems that control bacterial social behavior. We also generated a T. brucei social behavior mutant and found that the mutant phenotype is complemented by wild-type cells grown in the same culture. Our findings open new avenues for dissecting social behavior and signaling in protozoan parasites and illustrate the capacity of these organisms to influence each other's behavior in mixed communities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 588-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Imhof ◽  
Xuan Lan Vu ◽  
Peter Bütikofer ◽  
Isabel Roditi

ABSTRACT Transmission of African trypanosomes by tsetse flies requires that the parasites migrate out of the midgut lumen and colonize the ectoperitrophic space. Early procyclic culture forms correspond to trypanosomes in the lumen; on agarose plates they exhibit social motility, migrating en masse as radial projections from an inoculation site. We show that an Rft1 −/− mutant needs to reach a greater threshold number before migration begins, and that it forms fewer projections than its wild-type parent. The mutant is also up to 4 times less efficient at establishing midgut infections. Ectopic expression of Rft1 rescues social motility defects and restores the ability to colonize the fly. These results are consistent with social motility reflecting movement to the ectoperitrophic space, implicate N-glycans in the signaling cascades for migration in vivo and in vitro , and provide the first evidence that parasite-parasite interactions determine the success of transmission by the insect host.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Matetovici ◽  
Linda De Vooght ◽  
Jan Van Den Abbeele

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document