Comparison of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening-Filter-Free (FFF) 6 MV photon beam characteristics for small field dosimetry using EGSnrc Monte Carlo code

2017 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 63-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sangeetha ◽  
C.S. Sureka
2009 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S57 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lind ◽  
T. Knöös ◽  
C. Ceberg ◽  
E. Wieslander ◽  
B. McClean ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 5378-5383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immaculada Martínez-Rovira ◽  
Josep Puxeu-Vaqué ◽  
Yolanda Prezado

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6Part19) ◽  
pp. 3617-3617
Author(s):  
Y Wang ◽  
S Easterling ◽  
J Ting

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6Part19) ◽  
pp. 3619-3620
Author(s):  
R Popple ◽  
S Shen ◽  
J Duan ◽  
X Wu ◽  
I Brezovich

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S425-S426
Author(s):  
D. Mateus ◽  
G. Beyer ◽  
S. Vieira ◽  
C. Greco

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1Feb) ◽  
Author(s):  
S A Rahimi ◽  
B Hashemi ◽  
S R Mahdavi

Background: Estimating dosimetric parameters for small fields under non-reference conditions leads to significant errors if done based on conventional protocols used for large fields in reference conditions. Hence, further correction factors have been introduced to take into account the influence of spectral quality changes when various detectors are used in non-reference conditions at different depths and field sizes.Objective: Determining correction factors (KNR and KNCSF) recommended recently for small field dosimetry formalism by American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) for different detectors at 6 and 18 MV photon beams.Methods: EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used to calculate the doses measured with different detectors located in a slab phantom and the recommended KNR and KNCSF correction factors for various circular small field sizes ranging from 5-30 mm diameters. KNR and KNCSF correction factors were determined for different active detectors (a pinpoint chamber, EDP-20 and EDP-10 diodes) in a homogeneous phantom irradiated to 6 and 18 MV photon beams of a Varian linac (2100C/D).Results: KNR correction factor estimated for the highest small circular field size of 30 mm diameter for the pinpoint chamber, EDP-20 and EDP-10 diodes were 0.993, 1.020 and 1.054; and 0.992, 1.054 and 1.005 for the 6 and 18 MV beams, respectively. The KNCSF correction factor estimated for the lowest circular field size of 5 mm for the pinpoint chamber, EDP-20 and EDP-10 diodes were 0.994, 1.023, and 1.040; and 1.000, 1.014, and 1.022 for the 6 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively.Conclusion: Comparing the results obtained for the detectors used in this study reveals that the unshielded diodes (EDP-20 and EDP-10) can confidently be recommended for small field dosimetry as their correction factors (KNR and KNCSF) was close to 1.0 for all small field sizes investigated and are mainly independent from the electron beam spot size.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 7052
Author(s):  
James C. L. Chow

The aim of this study is to investigate the variations of depth dose enhancement (DDE) on different nanoparticle (NP) variables, when using the flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beam in nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy. Monte Carlo simulation under a macroscopic approach was used to determine the DDE ratio (DDER) with variables of NP material (gold (Au) and iron (III) oxide (Fe2O3)), NP concentration (3–40 mg/mL) and photon beam (10 MV flattening-filter (FF) and 10 MV FFF). It is found that Au NPs had a higher DDER than Fe2O3 NPs, when the depths were shallower than 6 and 8 cm for the 10 MV FF and 10 MV FFF photon beams, respectively. However, in a deeper depth range of 10–20 cm, DDER for the Au NPs was lower than Fe2O3 NPs mainly due to the beam attenuation and photon energy distribution. It is concluded that DDER for the Au NPs and Fe2O3 NPs decreased with an increase of depth in the range of 10–20 cm, with rate of decrease depending on the NP material, NP concentration and the use of FF in the photon beam.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document