Comparison of the Factor Structure of the Child Behavior Checklist 1.5–5 between Children with ASD and Children with DD

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 101867
Author(s):  
Yi-Ling Cheng ◽  
Lai-Sang Iao ◽  
Chin-Chin Wu
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4pt1) ◽  
pp. 1005-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggi Price ◽  
Charmaine Higa-McMillan ◽  
Chad Ebesutani ◽  
Kelsie Okamura ◽  
Brad J. Nakamura ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study examined the psychometric properties of the DSM-oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, Dumenci, & Rescorla, 2003) using confirmatory factor analysis to compare the six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to competing models consistent with developmental theories of symptom differentiation. We tested these models on both clinic-referred (N = 757) and school-based, nonreferred (N = 713) samples of youths in order to assess the generalizability of the factorial structures. Although previous research has supported the fit of the six-factor DSM-oriented structure in a normative sample of youths ages 7 to 18 (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001), tripartite model research indicates that anxiety and depressive symptomology are less differentiated among children compared to adolescents (Jacques & Mash, 2004). We thus examined the relative fit of a six- and a five-factor model (collapsing anxiety and depression) with younger (ages 7–10) and older (ages 11–18) youth subsamples. The results revealed that the six-factor model fit the best in all samples except among younger nonclinical children. The results extended the generalizability of the rationally derived six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to clinic-referred youths and provided further support to the notion that younger children in nonclinical samples exhibit less differentiated symptoms of anxiety and depression.


1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg M. Macmann ◽  
David W. Barnett ◽  
Steffani A. Burd ◽  
Trina Jones ◽  
Paul A. LeBuffe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 153450841989509
Author(s):  
Saundra M. Tabet ◽  
Mary K. Perleoni ◽  
Dalena Dillman Taylor ◽  
Viki P. Kelchner ◽  
Glenn W. Lambie

The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is one of the most frequently used assessments of social, emotional, and behavioral functioning; however, previous research has noted inconsistency in the factor structure and items included on the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6 to 18 Years (CBCL/6-18) when tested with diverse samples of client populations. Thus, the purpose of our investigation was to examine the factor structure of CBCL/6-18 scores ( N = 459) with diverse American children referred to receive school-based mental health counseling enrolled in five Title I elementary schools in the Southeastern United States. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) on CBCL/6-18 scores to examine the factor structure and internal consistency reliability of the data. Results demonstrated an inadequate fit for model and further data analyses resulted in a three-factor, 32-item model (41.40% of the variance explained). Implications of the findings support a new conceptual framework of the CBCL/6-18 to provide a more parsimonious model when working with diverse populations, specifically children from low-income families.


1988 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Evenson ◽  
Marc T. Frankel ◽  
Elizabeth A. Sirles ◽  
Richard Parsons

Factor-analysis of Child Behavior Checklist scores of 237 young boys from the Child Guidance Center in St. Louis yielded 7 of the 9 factors reported by Achenbach despite a more diverse ethnic and socioeconomic composition of this sample. Correlations between comparable factor-scales ranged from .86 to .94, except for the schizoid/anxious scales which correlated only .38.


Children ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Yi-Ling Cheng ◽  
Ching-Lin Chu ◽  
Chin-Chin Wu

The Child Behavior Checklist 1.5–5 (CBCL 1.5–5) is applied to identify emotional and behavioral problems on children with developmental disabilities (e.g., autism spectrum disorder [ASD] and developmental delays [DD]). To understand whether there are variations between these two groups on CBCL DSM-oriented scales, we took two invariance analyses on 443 children (228 children with ASD). The first analysis used measurement invariance and multiple-group factor analysis on the test structure. The second analysis used item-level analysis, i.e., differential item functioning (DIF), to discover whether group memberships responded differently on some items even though underlying trait levels were the same. It was discovered that, on the test structure, the Anxiety Problems scale did not achieve metric invariance. The other scales achieved metric invariance; DIF analyses further revealed that there were items that functioned differently across subscales. These DIF items were mostly about children’s reactions to the surrounding environment. Our findings provide implications for clinicians to use CBCL DSM-oriented scales on differentiating children with ASD and children with DD. In addition, researchers need to be mindful about how items were responded differently, even though there were no mean differences on the surface.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document