Recognition and prediction of manipulation actions using Enriched Semantic Event Chains

2018 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 173-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Ziaeetabar ◽  
Tomas Kulvicius ◽  
Minija Tamosiunaite ◽  
Florentin Wörgötter
Keyword(s):  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243829
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Ziaeetabar ◽  
Jennifer Pomp ◽  
Stefan Pfeiffer ◽  
Nadiya El-Sourani ◽  
Ricarda I. Schubotz ◽  
...  

Predicting other people’s upcoming action is key to successful social interactions. Previous studies have started to disentangle the various sources of information that action observers exploit, including objects, movements, contextual cues and features regarding the acting person’s identity. We here focus on the role of static and dynamic inter-object spatial relations that change during an action. We designed a virtual reality setup and tested recognition speed for ten different manipulation actions. Importantly, all objects had been abstracted by emulating them with cubes such that participants could not infer an action using object information. Instead, participants had to rely only on the limited information that comes from the changes in the spatial relations between the cubes. In spite of these constraints, participants were able to predict actions in, on average, less than 64% of the action’s duration. Furthermore, we employed a computational model, the so-called enriched Semantic Event Chain (eSEC), which incorporates the information of different types of spatial relations: (a) objects’ touching/untouching, (b) static spatial relations between objects and (c) dynamic spatial relations between objects during an action. Assuming the eSEC as an underlying model, we show, using information theoretical analysis, that humans mostly rely on a mixed-cue strategy when predicting actions. Machine-based action prediction is able to produce faster decisions based on individual cues. We argue that human strategy, though slower, may be particularly beneficial for prediction of natural and more complex actions with more variable or partial sources of information. Our findings contribute to the understanding of how individuals afford inferring observed actions’ goals even before full goal accomplishment, and may open new avenues for building robots for conflict-free human-robot cooperation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 9-20
Author(s):  
Taiki Miyanishi ◽  
Kazuhiro Seki ◽  
Kuniaki Uehara
Keyword(s):  

Linguistics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-603
Author(s):  
Norbert Vanek ◽  
Barbara Mertins

AbstractMuch of how we sequence events in speech mirrors the order of their natural occurrence. While event chains that conform to chronology may be easier to process, languages offer substantial freedom to manipulate temporal order. This article explores to what extent digressions from chronology are attributable to differences in grammatical aspect systems. We compared reverse order reports (RORs) in event descriptions elicited from native speakers of four languages, two with (Spanish, Modern Standard Arabic [MSA]) and two without grammatical aspect (German, Hungarian). In the Arabic group, all participants were highly competent MSA speakers from Palestine and Jordan. Standardized frequency counts showed significantly more RORs expressed by non-aspect groups than by aspect groups. Adherence to chronology changing as a function of contrast in grammatical aspect signal that languages without obligatory marking of ongoingness may provide more flexibility for event reordering. These findings bring novel insights about the dynamic interplay between language structure and temporal sequencing in the discourse stream.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document