Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model in a mountain environment

2020 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 111724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kateřina Gdulová ◽  
Jana Marešová ◽  
Vítězslav Moudrý
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Cook ◽  
T. Murray ◽  
A. Luckman ◽  
D. G. Vaughan ◽  
N. E. Barrand

Abstract. A high resolution surface topography Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is required to underpin studies of the complex glacier system on the Antarctic Peninsula. A complete DEM with better than 200 m pixel size and high positional and vertical accuracy would enable mapping of all significant glacial basins and provide a dataset for glacier morphology analyses. No currently available DEM meets these specifications. We present a new 100-m DEM of the Antarctic Peninsula (63–70° S), based on ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) data. The raw GDEM products are of high-quality on the rugged terrain and coastal-regions of the Antarctic Peninsula and have good geospatial accuracy, but they also contain large errors on ice-covered terrain and we seek to minimise these artefacts. Conventional data correction techniques do not work so we have developed a method that significantly improves the dataset, smoothing the erroneous regions and hence creating a DEM with a pixel size of 100 m that will be suitable for many glaciological applications. We evaluate the new DEM using ICESat-derived elevations, and perform horizontal and vertical accuracy assessments based on GPS positions, SPOT-5 DEMs and the Landsat Image Mosaic of Antarctica (LIMA) imagery. The new DEM has a mean elevation difference of −4 m (± 25 m RMSE) from ICESat (compared to −13 m mean and ±97 m RMSE for the original ASTER GDEM), and a horizontal error of less than 2 pixels, although elevation accuracies are lower on mountain peaks and steep-sided slopes. The correction method significantly reduces errors on low relief slopes and therefore the DEM can be regarded as suitable for topographical studies such as measuring the geometry and ice flow properties of glaciers on the Antarctic Peninsula. The DEM is available for download from the NSIDC website: http://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0516.html (doi:10.5060/D47P8W9D).


Author(s):  
S. D. Jawak ◽  
A. J. Luis

Available digital elevation models (DEMs) of Antarctic region generated by using radar altimetry and the Antarctic digital database (ADD) indicate elevation variations of up to hundreds of meters, which necessitates the generation of local DEM and its validation by using ground reference. An enhanced digital elevation model (eDEM) of the Schirmacher oasis region, east Antarctica, is generated synergistically by using Cartosat-1 stereo pair-derived photogrammetric DEM (CartoDEM)-based point elevation dataset and multitemporal radarsat Antarctic mapping project version 2 (RAMPv2) DEM-based point elevation dataset. In this study, we analyzed suite of interpolation techniques for constructing a DEM from RAMPv2 and CartoDEM-based point elevation datasets, in order to determine the level of confidence with which the interpolation techniques can generate a better interpolated continuous surface, and eventually improves the elevation accuracy of DEM from synergistically fused RAMPv2 and CartoDEM point elevation datasets. RAMPv2 points and CartoDEM points were used as primary data for various interpolation techniques such as ordinary kriging (OK), simple kriging (SK), universal kriging (UK), disjunctive kriging (DK) techniques, inverse distance weighted (IDW), global polynomial (GP) with power 1 and 2, local polynomial (LP) and radial basis functions (RBF). Cokriging of 2 variables with second dataset was used for ordinary cokriging (OCoK), simple cokriging (SCoK), universal cokriging (UCoK) and disjunctive cokriging (DCoK). The IDW, GP, LP, RBF, and kriging methods were applied to one variable, while Cokriging experiments were employed on two variables. The experiment of dataset and its combination produced two types of point elevation map categorized as (1) one variable (RAMPv2 Point maps and CartoDEM Point maps) and (2) two variables (RAMPv2 Point maps + CartoDEM Point maps). Interpolated surfaces were evaluated with the help of differential global positioning system (DGPS) points collected from study area during the Indian Scientific Expedition to Antarctic (ISEA). Accuracy assessment of the RAMPv2 DEM, CartoDEM, and combined eDEM (RAMPv2 + CartoDEM) by using DGPS as ground reference data shows that eDEM achieves much better accuracy (average elevation error 8.44 m) than that of existing DEM constructed by using only CartoDEM (13.57 m) or RAMPv2 (41.44 m) alone. The newly constructed eDEM achieves a vertical accuracy of about 7 times better than RAMPv2 DEM and 1.5 times better than CartoDEM. After using accurate DGPS data for accuracy assessment, the approximation to the actual surface of the eDEM extracted here is much more accurate with least mean root mean square error (RMSE) of 9.22 m than that constructed by using only CartoDEM (RMSE = 14.15 m) point elevation data and RAMPv2 (RMSE = 69.48 m) point elevation data. Our results indicate that, the overall trend of accuracy for the interpolation methods for generating continuous elevation surface from CartoDEM + RAMPv2 point elevation data, based on RMSE, is as follows: GP1 > IDW > GP2 > OK > LP2 > DK > LP1 > RBF > SK > UK. In case of cokriging interpolation methods, OCoK yields more accurate eDEM with the least RMSE of 8.16 m, which can be utilized to generate a highly accurate DEM of the research area.. Based on this work, it is inferred that GP2 and OCok interpolation methods and synergistic use of RAMPv2 and CartoDEM-based point elevation datasets lead to a highly accurate DEM of the study region. This research experiment demonstrates the stability (w.r.t multi-temporal datasets), performance (w.r.t best interpolation technique) and consistency (w.r.t all the experimented interpolation techniques) of synergistically fused eDEM. On the basis of average elevation difference and RMSE mentioned in present research, the newly constructed eDEM may serve as a benchmark for future elevation models such as from the ICESAT-II mission to spatially monitor ice sheet elevation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document