vertical accuracy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

139
(FIVE YEARS 52)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkatesh Kasi ◽  
Pavan Kumar Yeditha ◽  
Maheswaran Rathinasamy ◽  
Chandramouli Sangamreddi

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 4791
Author(s):  
Xiaoyong Zhu ◽  
Xinming Tang ◽  
Guo Zhang ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Wenmin Hu

Digital Surface Model (DSM) derived from high resolution satellite imagery is important for various applications. GFDM is China’s first civil optical remote sensing satellite with multiple agile imaging modes and sub-meter resolution. Its panchromatic resolution is 0.5 m and 1.68 m for multi-spectral images. Compared with the onboard stereo viewing instruments (0.8 m for forward image, 0.65 m for back image, and 2.6 m for back multi-spectrum images) of GF-7, a mapping satellite of China in the same period, their accuracy is very similar. However, the accuracy of GFDM DSM has not yet been verified or fully characterized, and the detailed difference between the two has not yet been assessed either. This paper evaluates the DSM accuracy generated by GFDM and GF-7 satellite imagery using high-precision reference DSM and the observations of Ground Control Points (GCPs) as the reference data. A method to evaluate the DSM accuracy based on regional DSM errors and GCPs errors is proposed. Through the analysis of DSM subtraction, profile lines, strips detection and residuals coupling differences, the differences of DSM overall accuracy, vertical accuracy, horizontal accuracy and the strips errors between GFDM DSM and GF-7 DSM are evaluated. The results show that the overall accuracy of both is close while the vertical accuracy is slightly different. When regional DSM is used as the benchmark, the GFDM DSM has a slight advantage in elevation accuracy, but there are some regular fluctuation strips with small amplitude. When GCPs are used as the reference, the elevation Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of GFDM DSM is about 0.94 m, and that of GF-7 is 0.67 m. GF-7 DSM is more accurate, but both of the errors are within 1 m. The DSM image residuals of the GF-7 are within 0.5 pixel, while the residuals of GFDM are relatively large, reaching 0.8 pixel.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 4653
Author(s):  
Martin Karlson ◽  
David Bastviken ◽  
Heather Reese

Many biochemical processes and dynamics are strongly controlled by terrain topography, making digital elevation models (DEM) a fundamental dataset for a range of applications. This study investigates the quality of four pan-Arctic DEMs (Arctic DEM, ASTER DEM, ALOS DEM and Copernicus DEM) within the Kalix River watershed in northern Sweden, with the aim of informing users about the quality when comparing these DEMs. The quality assessment focuses on both the vertical accuracy of the DEMs and their abilities to model two fundamental elevation derivatives, including topographic wetness index (TWI) and landform classification. Our results show that the vertical accuracy is relatively high for Arctic DEM, ALOS and Copernicus and in our study area was slightly better than those reported in official validation results. Vertical errors are mainly caused by tree cover characteristics and terrain slope. On the other hand, the high vertical accuracy does not translate directly into high quality elevation derivatives, such as TWI and landform classes, as shown by the large errors in TWI and landform classification for all four candidate DEMs. Copernicus produced elevation derivatives with results most similar to those from the reference DEM, but the errors are still relatively high, with large underestimation of TWI in land cover classes with a high likelihood of being wet. Overall, the Copernicus DEM produced the most accurate elevation derivatives, followed by slightly lower accuracies from Arctic DEM and ALOS, and the least accurate being ASTER.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-130
Author(s):  
Atriyon Julzarika ◽  
Trias Aditya ◽  
Subaryono Subaryono ◽  
Harintaka Harintaka

The latest Digital Terrain Model (DTM) is seen as an upgradable DTM that is fitted to the latest combination of DTM master and its displacement. The latest DTM can be used to overcome the problem of static DTM weaknesses in displaying the latest topographic changes. DTM masters are obtained from InSAR and Digital Surface Model (DSM) ALOS PALSAR conversions. Meanwhile, the displacement is obtained from Sentinel-1 images, which can be updated every 6–12 days or at least every month. ALOS PALSAR data were the images acquired in 2008 and 2017, while Sentinel-1 data used were images acquired in 2018 and 2020. This study aims to reveal the importance of an upgradable DTM so called latest DTM which is combination of DTM master and its displacement in order to show the latest condition of study area. The case study is the dynamics analyze of the Semangko fault specifically in the Sianok and Sumani segments situated in Indonesia. The vertical accuracy assessment was done to evaluate the DSM to DTM conversion with a tolerance of 1.96σ. The result obtained is the latest DTM. It is derived from the integration of the DTM master with displacement. The latest DTM can be used to detect the dynamics of Semangko fault. The study area has vertical deformation at a value of –50 cm to 30 cm. The Semangko fault area is dominated by –25 to 5 cm deformation. In general, this region has decreased. The decline in this region ranges from 7.5 cm to 10 cm per year. The latest DTM vertical accuracy is 2.158 m (95% confidence level) with a scale of 1: 10,000 to 1: 20,000.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4352
Author(s):  
Seamus Coveney ◽  
Xavier Monteys ◽  
John D. Hedley ◽  
Yeray Castillo-Campo ◽  
Brian Kelleher

Nearshore bathymetric data are used in many coastal monitoring applications, but acquisition conditions can be challenging. Shipborne surveys are prone to the risk of grounding in shallow waters, and scheduled airborne surveys often fail to coincide with optimal atmospheric and water conditions. As an alternative, since its launch in 2018, ICESat-2 satellite laser profile altimetry data provide free and readily available data on a 91-day repeat cycle, which may contain incidental bathymetric returns when suitable environmental conditions prevail. In this paper, the vertical accuracy of extracted, refraction-adjusted ICESat-2 nearshore marine bathymetric data is evaluated at four test sites in a Northern hemisphere, temperate latitude location. Multiple ICEsat-2 bathymetric values that occurred in close horizontal proximity to one another were averaged at a spatial scale of 1 m and compared with Multibeam Echosounder bathymetric survey data and Global Navigation Satellite System reference data. Mean absolute errors of less than 0.15 m were observed up to depths of 5 m, with errors of less than 0.24 m (to 6 m), 0.39 m (to 7 m) and 0.52 m (to 10 m). The occurrence of larger bathymetric errors with depth, which increase to 0.54 m at maximum photon depths of 11 m, appears to be primarily related to reduced numbers of geolocated photons with depth. The accuracies achieved up to 6 m suggest that the manual extraction, refraction adjustment and bathymetric filtering steps were effective. Overall, the results suggest that ICESat-2 bathymetric data accuracy may be sufficient to be considered for use in nearshore coastal monitoring applications where shipborne and airborne bathymetric data might otherwise be applied.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5537
Author(s):  
Carlos Rodero ◽  
Estrella Olmedo ◽  
Raul Bardaji ◽  
Jaume Piera

Measuring the diffuse attenuation coefficient (Kd) allows for monitoring the water body’s environmental status. This parameter is of particular interest in water quality monitoring programs because it quantifies the presence of light and the euphotic zone’s depth. Citizen scientists can meaningfully contribute by monitoring water quality, complementing traditional methods by reducing monitoring costs and significantly improving data coverage, empowering and supporting decision-making. However, the quality of the acquisition of in situ underwater irradiance measurements has some limitations, especially in areas where stratification phenomena occur in the first meters of depth. This vertical layering introduces a gradient of properties in the vertical direction, affecting the associated Kd. To detect and characterize these variations of Kd in the water column, it needs a system of optical sensors, ideally placed in a range of a few cm, improving the low vertical accuracy. Despite that, the problem of self-shading on the instrumentation becomes critical. Here, we introduce a new concept that aims to improve the vertical accuracy of the irradiance measurements: the underwater annular irradiance (Ea). This new concept consists of measuring the irradiance in an annular-shaped distribution. We first compute the optimal annular angle that avoids self-shading and maximizes the light captured by the sensors. Second, we use different scenarios of water types, solar zenith angle, and cloud coverage to assess the robustness of the corresponding diffuse attenuation coefficient, Ka. Finally, we derive empirical functions for computing Kd from Ka. This new concept opens the possibility to a new generation of optical sensors in an annular-shaped distribution which is expected to (a) increase the vertical resolution of the irradiance measurements and (b) be easy to deploy and maintain and thus to be more suitable for citizen scientists.


Author(s):  
H. A. Lassiter ◽  
B. Wilkinson ◽  
A. Gonzalez Perez ◽  
C. Kelly

Abstract. Surveying an area with small, unoccupied aerial systems (UAS) equipped with a lidar mapping payload—absent permanent, stable, geometrical reference surfaces—demands accurate, repeatable data collection procedures. While relative error within a single UAS lidar dataset may reveal itself in strip misalignment, absolute error (particularly horizontal error) can prove more difficult to detect, casting doubt upon the quality of both individual surveys and time change analyses of multiple surveys of the area. To gain insight on the UAS lidar error budget, this study presents an analysis of multiple UAS lidar surveys over a set of accurately surveyed geometric checkpoints. Each flight’s trajectory was processed multiple times using multiple static GNSS base observations, both autonomous and set over surveyed monuments, at varying distances from the study site. Custom algorithms were used to mensurate the geometric targets detected in each UAS lidar survey's point cloud, allowing for precise comparison of both absolute horizontal and vertical accuracy of each survey against the rigorous ground survey. The results of the analysis suggest that high horizontal accuracy can be achieved under a variety of conditions, whereas vertical accuracy is sensitive to the quality of ground control. and a discussion of the results explores the ultimate goal of isolating and understanding the sources and magnitudes of error in the UAS lidar error budget.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document