scholarly journals Evaluation of interpretation criteria for drilled shafts with tip post-grouting

Author(s):  
Yit-Jin Chen ◽  
Wei-Yi Lin ◽  
Anjerick Topacio ◽  
Kok-Kwang Phoon
IFCEE 2021 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Marinucci ◽  
Mario A. Terceros Herrera ◽  
Mario Terceros Arce
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yit-Jin Chen ◽  
Cheng-Chieh Hsiao ◽  
Anjerick Topacio

This study evaluates the analysis models of side resistance in rock sections by utilizing a wide variety of load test data. Available analytical models including the empirical adhesion factor versus the rock’s uniaxial compressive strength and its root are analyzed and compared statistically to determine the optimum relationships. The interpretation criteria for the L1 and L2 methods are used to analyze the load test results for serviceability and ultimate limit states, respectively. The analysis results show that the relationship model with the empirical adhesion factor versus the root of the rock’s uniaxial compressive strength exhibits better correlation than the one with the rock’s uniaxial compressive strength. Moreover, the general coordinate axes regression equation demonstrates better reliability than the semi-logarithmic and full logarithmic axes equations for both limit states. Based on these analyses, specific design recommendations for the side resistance of drilled shafts socketed into rocks are developed and provided with the appropriate statistics to verify their reliability.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yit-Jin Chen ◽  
Tsu-Hung Chu

Representative interpretation criteria are examined in this paper to evaluate the capacity of drilled shaft foundations under axial uplift loading in gravelly soils. A large number of uplift shaft load tests for gravelly soils are used for analysis, and the interpretation criteria are applied to these load test data to establish a consistent uplift interpretation criterion. The statistical results show that the smaller the uplift displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. In general, the displacements required to mobilize shaft failure load in gravelly soils are larger than those in non-gravelly soils. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established. Specific design recommendations for the evaluation of uplift drilled shaft capacity are given.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 634-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yit-Jin Chen ◽  
Song-Wei Lin ◽  
Fred H. Kulhawy

Representative criteria are examined to evaluate the “interpreted failure load” or “capacity” of rigid drilled shaft foundations under lateral loading. Field lateral load test data are used for this analysis, consisting of both drained and undrained databases. It was found that a hyperbola describes the load–displacement data well and that the normalized undrained curve is stiffer, higher, and more sharply curving than the drained curve. The initial elastic region ends at approximately 1%B (where B is the shaft diameter),which represents serviceability limit state (SLS) conditions. The final region begins at about 4%–5%B, which represents ultimate limit state (ULS) conditions. Also, the QL method is most appropriate for interpreting the “failure load” because it is the only method that incorporates actual soil-shaft failure mechanisms as part of the interpretation, is the least variable, and has the lowest coefficient of variation (COV). Further detailed recommendations are given for assessing the load test data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document