An Analysis of Local and Combined (Global) Scours on Piers-on-Bank Bridges

This paper examines the scour problems related to piers-on-bank bridges resulting from frequently flooded and/or constricted waterways. While local scour problems for bridge piers in riverine channels have been addressed extensively in the literature, there have been few studies addressing piers-on-bank scour scenarios. A comprehensive three-dimensional finite element analysis using the element removal (ER) technique has been performed on a recently constructed bridge with an observable scour problem on multiple piers. The analysis is further extended to study the effect of “combined scour” or extensive erosion of soil between adjacent piles. Three different loading cases were considered in the study, and the results demonstrated that the effects of local and combined scours on bridge drilled shaft foundations can be significant under the combined actions of axial, lateral loads and bending moments. Specifically, the most critical case of combined scour is when maximum moment effect is applied to the piers. The results of this study show that the interaction of soil displacement fields between adjacent piles should be investigated for bridge crossings with piers-on-bank, with a high risk of flooding during the moderate-to-low probability of the occurrence of precipitation events, as they can increase the pile head displacements and the bending moments in the soil and result in the early failure of bridges.

Geotechnical Resistances of Drilled Shafts in Triassic Basin Sedimentary Rocks

Load tests on drilled shaft foundations with rock sockets in sedimentary formations associated with various Triassic Basins in the Mid-Atlantic region show that some generalizations are possible for estimating geotechnical resistances. Axial load tests on drilled shafts in locations several hundred miles apart produce surprisingly similar results. The common feature is the geology: all of the load-tested rock sockets considered were constructed in sedimentary rock associated with one of the rift basins that developed in response to breaking apart of the supercontinent Pangaea that began during the late Triassic Period (about 220 million years ago) and coincided with opening of the Atlantic Ocean. More specifically, all of the tested rock sockets were in the ‘red bed’ facies of the rift basin sediments consisting of reddish-brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Each of the projects described herein and the associated load tests are described and used to illustrate fundamental principles of rock socket design and how load testing can be used as a design tool. The important role of quality construction, in combination with quality assurance through inspection and testing, is emphasized, especially as it relates to the evaluation of base resistance for rock socket design.

Safety Factor for Drilled Shaft Foundations Subjected to Wind-Induced Torsion

Public transportation agencies commonly use drilled shaft foundations as support of mast arm traffic signs and signal pole structures. These structures and their foundations are subjected to wind-induced torsion. Design provisions can be found in AASHTO specifications for structural supports for highway signs, luminaires and traffic signals; nevertheless, those standards do not provide guidance to estimate the torsional resistance of drilled shaft foundations, or what an appropriate factor of safety (or resistance factor) for design could be. Although load and resistance factors format is desired because AASHTO is moving in that direction, still many Departments of Transportation design requirements are based on factors of safety. In this study, a probabilistic approach is used to recommend a rational procedure to determine factors of safety that consider the uncertainties and the consequences of failure. This procedure can be modified for load and resistance factors design calibration, as well. The skin friction approach was calibrated employing reliability analysis, available statistics, published experimental data, and simulations. However, a lack of field test data has been noticed. Factors of safety for cohesive, cohesionless, and layered soils are recommended. They are presented as a function of the target reliability index, and which in-situ test is performed to obtain the soil strength properties. Three alternatives were considered: standard penetration test, cone penetration test, and vane shear test. The procedure described can be used by practitioners to select appropriate factors of safety based on local conditions when statistical parameters from a particular site investigation are available.