scholarly journals Competition between Full Service Network Carriers and Low Cost Carriers in Turkish Airline Market

2015 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 642-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zafer Acar ◽  
Selçuk Karabulak
Aviation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panarat Srisaeng ◽  
Glenn S. Baxter ◽  
Graham Wild

Due to the vast distances across the country as well as between urban centres, Australia is heavily reliant upon its air transport industry. Following deregulation of Australia's domestic air travel market on the 30th October, 1990, low cost carriers have entered the market. Australia's LCC market has had three discrete phases. The first wave occurred between 1990 and 1993 and was subsequently followed by a duopoly period in 1994–1999. The second wave occurred between 2000 and 2006 and the final wave has been in the post-2006 period. This paper examines the evolution of Australia's domestic low cost carrier airline market and finds that by 2010, low cost carriers had captured around 64 per cent of the market. Following the evolution of the “Virgin Australia” business model from a low cost carrier to a full service network carrier, commencing in 2011, the low cost carrier's market share has declined significantly and is now around 31 per cent. “Jetstar” and “Tiger Airways” are the two major carriers presently operating in this market segment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Wittmer ◽  
Nicole Oberlin

The airline industry has evolved from a system of long-established state owned carriers operating in a regular market to a dynamic, deregulated industry. This development – especially the emerging competition of low-cost carriers – has had a major influence on the price setting behaviour of airlines. Profitability of airlines is limited and pricing systems are reconsidered. To stay competitive, traditional full service carriers consider the implementation of ancillary revenue systems, which are similar to low-cost carriers. This paper investigates challenges of an ancillary revenue pricing approach for full service network carriers. A qualitative means-end approach is used to find attributes, which are important for air passengers, and influence their ticket buying behaviour. In addition, the study provides insight into the perception of an ancillary revenue system in the full service network carrier market. The findings present 18 ticket purchase attributes and 15 behavioural terminal values in hierarchical value maps. Based on these values, it is evident that most passengers appreciate if some services are included in the price and not offered as ancillaries. Benefits of ancillary revenue systems include the individual ticket creation, customisation, improved price-performance ratio, flexibility gains and progressive ideas. The main drawbacks of the system include a complicated and complex booking process, feelings of uncertainty, branding problems, a distortion of competitive behaviours, a system similar to that of low-cost carriers, feelings of paying extra for every service and a perceived decline in service and quality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Peng Qin

<p><em>The airline industry is characterized by a number of business models with the most prominent being the Full Service Network Carriers (FSNC) and Low Cost Carriers (LCC) models. The main difference between full service network carriers and low cost carriers is how the airline companies operation their revenue and cost.</em></p><p><em>The advanced developments in telecommunications, air pollutions and the competition of high rail are three new challenges for the airline industry globally while an increasing passengers and the government policies are two big issues for Asia/Pacific regional airline companies. The fuel price and human-related costs are two big issues affecting the company’s cost. Code-sharing and advertising are two possibly ways in increasing company’s revenue, cutting down the fuel cost, advertising costs, controlling the human cost and cooperating with airports are four possibly ways in reducing company’s cost.</em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document