Comparative life-cycle energy analysis of a new and an existing house: The significance of occupant’s habits, building systems and embodied energy

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 507-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Monteiro ◽  
John E. Fernández ◽  
Fausto Freire
2022 ◽  
Vol 1212 (1) ◽  
pp. 012004
Author(s):  
D L Le ◽  
T Q Nguyen ◽  
H C Pham

Abstract The paper presents the life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of an office green building in Hanoi, Vietnam to prove the advantages of green buildings regarding energy efficiency and environmental effects. The case study building is a concrete structured one, which consists of 3 basements, 17 floors, and 1 attic with a gross area of 14,112 m2. In the study, the building’s embodied energy is determined based on the contained energy coefficient of the ith material and its quantity needed. Whereas, the operating energy is computed according to the annual energy consumption of the building, which is stimulated by the EnergyPlus simulation software. Relying on the relative share of the demolition energy with the life cycle energy that has been proposed by previous publications, this category will be estimated. Results showed that the initial embodied energy contributed the largest share to the life cycle energy (61.37%), followed by operational energy (27.61%). It also indicated that the percentage share of the operational energy of a green building is much lower than that of other buildings. The primary reason for this is associated with the usage of environmentally friendly materials and energy-saving equipment in the design option of the green building. Therefore, it can be convincing evidence that may help to change the mindset of decision-makers in Vietnam about green buildings.


2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Fay ◽  
Graham Treloar ◽  
Usha Iyer-Raniga

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 798-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peder E. Fitch ◽  
Joyce Smith Cooper

This paper presents a method of performing Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) for the purpose of material selection. The method applies product analysis methods to the evaluation of material options for automotive components. Specifically, LCEA is used to compare material options for a bumper-reinforcing beam on a 1030 kg vehicle. In this analysis, glass fiber composites and high-strength steel beams result in the lowest life cycle energy consumption. This paper also presents a set of life cycle energy terms designed to clearly distinguish between energy consumption occurring during different phases of a product’s life cycle. In addition, this paper compares the results of the LCEA method to those of other energy analyses and demonstrates how different methods of varying thoroughness can result in different material selections. Finally, opportunities are identified for extending this type of analysis beyond both automotive components and energy consumption. In particular, this paper identifies the need to develop similar methods for other environmental indicators.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 301-310
Author(s):  
Do Guen Yoo ◽  
Seung Yub Lee ◽  
Ho Min Lee ◽  
Hwandon Jun ◽  
Joong Hoon Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document