scholarly journals Comparisons of the seizure-free outcome and visual field deficits between anterior temporal lobectomy and selective amygdalohippocampectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Seizure ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Xu ◽  
Xiongfei Wang ◽  
Yuguang Guan ◽  
Meng Zhao ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
...  
Epilepsia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1018-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Yam ◽  
David Nicolle ◽  
David A. Steven ◽  
Donald Lee ◽  
Tiiu Hess ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1818-1822 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Egan ◽  
W. T. Shults ◽  
N. So ◽  
K. Burchiel ◽  
J. X. Kellogg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandros G. Brotis ◽  
Theofanis Giannis ◽  
Eftychia Kapsalaki ◽  
Efthymios Dardiotis ◽  
Kostas N. Fountas

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. e1303-e1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Donos ◽  
Patrick Rollo ◽  
Kathryn Tombridge ◽  
Jessica A. Johnson ◽  
Nitin Tandon

ObjectiveTo qualify the incidence of and risk factors for visual field deficits (VFD) following laser interstitial thermal ablation (LITT) for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and to relate this to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL).MethodsFifty-seven patients underwent LITT of the amygdalo-hippocampal complex (AH) for MTLE. Masks of ablation volumes, laser probe trajectories, and visual radiations (VRs) from individual subject space were transformed into standardized space using nonlinear registration. Voxel-wise statistics were performed to model relationships between VFDs vs ablation volumes, laser trajectories, VRs, and AH asymmetry. A review of VFDs following ATLs was performed.ResultsThe incidence of VFD after LITT is much lower than after ATLs. A total of 37.5% of patients developed a VFD, with the probability of this being much higher after left (50%) vs right hemisphere LITT (10%) (Fisher test, p = 0.05). This laterality effect on VFDs is mirrored but underappreciated in ATL series. The most consistent LITT-VFD occurred in the superior vertical octant. Ablation of Meyer loop as well as the summed probability of VRs within laser trajectories correlated with VFDs (p < 0.05). Left and right hippocampi have significantly distinct orientations in axial and coronal planes, which may be one reason for the variation in VFD probability.ConclusionsLITT results in lower rates of and smaller VFDs—typically an octantanopsia. VRs are at greater risk during surgery for left than right MTLE. Anatomical asymmetries in hippocampal anatomy may explain the hemispheric differences in deficits, and should factor into trajectory planning and also into preoperative patient counseling. Overall the incidence and extent of visual deficits following LITT for MTLE is lower than the reported data following anterior temporal lobectomy. VF tractography incorporated into LITT planning may reduce the occurrence of VFDs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1089-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Han Hu ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Fan-Gang Meng ◽  
Ning Chen ◽  
...  

Object Whether selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SelAH) has similar seizure outcomes and better neuropsychological outcomes compared with anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the 2 types of surgery with respect to seizure outcomes and changes in IQ scores. Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies published between January 1990 and September 2012. Studies comparing SelAH and ATL with respect to seizure and intelligence outcomes were included. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the included studies and independently extracted the data. Odds ratios and standardized mean deviations with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare pooled proportions of freedom from seizures and changes in IQ scores between the SelAH and ATL groups. Results Three prospective and 10 retrospective studies were identified involving 745 and 766 patients who underwent SelAH and ATL, respectively. The meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the odds of seizure freedom for patients who underwent SelAH compared with those who underwent ATL (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51–0.82], p = 0.0005). The differences between the changes in all IQ scores after the 2 types of surgery were not statistically significant, regardless of the side of resection. Conclusions Selective amygdalohippocampectomy statistically reduced the odds of being seizure free compared with ATL, but the clinical significance of this reduction needs to be further validated by well-designed randomized trials. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy did not have better outcomes than ATL with respect to intelligence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e32.3-e33
Author(s):  
N Vakharia ◽  
F Xiao ◽  
A O’Keeffe ◽  
R Sparks ◽  
W McEvoy ◽  
...  

ObjectivesOne third of patients with focal epilepsy fail to achieve seizure freedom despite best medical therapy. Surgery may provide seizure freedom if the epileptogenic zone can be safely remove. We compare the outcomes following open surgery, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and radiosurgery (RS).DesignPRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.SubjectsMTLEMethodsStructured searchs of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Random effects meta-analysis to calculate effects sizes and a pooled estimate of the probability of remaining seizure free at one year following intervention.ResultsFrom 1212 screened publications, 57 articles were included in the quantitative analysis. Open surgery included anterior temporal lobectomy as well as transcortical, subtemporal and transsylvian selective amygdalohippocampectomy. The probability of remaining seizure free at one year was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83–0.93) with open surgery based on Level 1 and 2 evidence. RS resulted in 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.90) probability and a single RCT revealed RS was less efficacious than open surgery. Follow up duration and study sizes were limited with LITT and RFA providing a probability of remaining seizure free at one year of 0.71 (95% CI 0.65–0.76) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.92) respectively.ConclusionsThere is no evidence supporting novel ‘minimally invasive’ approaches as being as efficacious as open surgery. Secondary outcome measures such as neuropsychological outcome and intervention morbidity are poorly reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document