PDMS modified membranes by 1-dodecanol and its effect on ethanol removal by pervaporation

2019 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan A. León ◽  
Javier Fontalvo
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gerster ◽  
C. Fagouri ◽  
E. Peregi

Abstract One challenge facing green tire technology is to achieve good silica hydrophobation/dispersion within the polymer matrix without a detrimental increase in the rubber compound’s viscosity during compounding. This phenomenon is well known to be induced by premature and unwanted coupling and/or crosslinking of the traditional coupling agents. The current state-of-the-art polysulfides silanes, bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide and to a lesser extent bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl)disulfide (“Product Application—VP Si 75/VP X 75-S in the Rubber Industry,” Degussa Hüls Report No. PA 723.1E), need to be carefully incorporated with careful temperature control during the rubber compounding to prevent this “scorchy” behavior. This paper will present novel monofunctional silanes which are suited for preparing highly silica-loaded rubber compounds of superior processability, while applying fewer mixing passes, thereby reducing mixing times which can lead to improved productivity and cost savings. Additionally, these safer coupling agents can be processed at higher temperatures which can, again, lead to reduced mixing time and better ethanol removal thereby improving the tire’s physical properties and reducing the volatile organic compounds generated during the tire’s use. The rubber compounds produced using these monofunctional silanes are characterized by lower Mooney viscosity and improved processability. Advantageously, within these novel chemical classes of coupling agents, selective functionalization of the silanes allows production of tailor-made coupling agents which can respond to the specific requirements of the tire industry (Vilgis, T. A. and Heinrich, G., “Die Physic des Autoreifens,” Physikalische Blätter, Vol. 57, 2001, pp. 1–7).


Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 125529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lichao Lu ◽  
Dong Dong ◽  
Zenab Tariq Baig ◽  
Marvin Yeung ◽  
Jinying Xi

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 954-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. S. Sonego ◽  
D. A. Lemos ◽  
A. J. G. Cruz ◽  
A. C. Badino

Foods ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duc-Truc Pham ◽  
Vanessa J. Stockdale ◽  
David W. Jeffery ◽  
Jonathan Tuke ◽  
Kerry L. Wilkinson

Warmer growing seasons, variations to grape ripening dynamics, and stylistic changes have contributed to increased wine alcohol levels, which can negatively impact sensory properties. As a consequence, winemakers have sought technological innovations to produce reduced alcohol wine (RAW). The sensory methodology used by industry to optimize the ethanol content of RAW is known as ‘alcohol sweetspotting’. However, to date, there is no scientific evidence to support the alcohol sweetspot phenomenon, and the sensory methodology used for alcohol sweetspotting has not been validated. In this study, different methods of presenting wine samples (i.e., ordered vs. randomized, and linear vs. circular) were employed to determine to what extent presentation order influences the outcome of alcohol sweetspotting trials. Two different approaches to statistical analysis of sensory data, i.e., chi-square goodness of fit vs. one proportion tests, were also evaluated. Statistical analyses confirmed alcohol sweetspots were apparent in some sweetspot determination trials, but outcomes were not reproducible in replicate determinations (either by panel or by individual panelists). Analysis of data using the one proportion test improved the likelihood of identifying statistically significant differences between RAWs, but variation in individuals’ sensitivity to differences in sensory properties following ethanol removal prevented validation of the alcohol sweetspot phenomenon based on the wines studied.


1974 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Hawkins ◽  
R. C. Nielsen ◽  
R. L. Veech

After ethanol injection similar metabolite changes were found in livers of clofibrate-treated and non-treated rats. The rate of ethanol removal from blood of clofibrate-treated rats was increased by 50%, but this was directly proportional to the increased liver size caused by clofibrate. No other difference needs to be postulated to explain the increased rate of ethanol removal from blood.


1972 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 945-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. O. Lindros ◽  
R. Vihma ◽  
O. A. Forsander

1. Removal of acetaldehyde and ethanol has been studied in perfused rat livers. 2. The maximum rate of ethanol oxidation was 2μmol/min per g of liver, which was less than the calculated capacity of the ethanol-oxidizing system. The lactate/pyruvate ratio of the medium increased with the rate of ethanol removal. At low ethanol concentrations most of the acetaldehyde formed was oxidized further, but at ethanol concentrations above 16mm about 60% of the acetaldehyde left the liver unmetabolized. 3. At lower concentrations the greater part of added acetaldehyde was oxidized, but above 5mm, 50–60% of that removed was recovered as ethanol. 4. When the reduction of acetaldehyde was blocked by pyrazole, removal was strongly diminished. There was no effect on the lactate/pyruvate ratio during oxidation of low concentrations of acetaldehyde, even in the presence of pyrazole, but at higher concentrations a gradual increase occurred. 5. The results indicate that during ethanol oxidation the ethanol/acetaldehyde pair is not in redox equilibrium with the lactate/pyruvate pair. Ethanol oxidation was abolished by addition of acetaldehyde. Under these conditions the lactate/pyruvate ratio was 1.5–1.8 times the ethanol/acetaldehyde ratio, indicating equilibration of the alcohol dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase systems. 6. The results support the view that ultimately the rate of mitochondrial oxidation of NADH limits the removal of ethanol in the liver.


1997 ◽  
Vol 63-65 (1) ◽  
pp. 469-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry L. Schmidt ◽  
Michele D. Myers ◽  
Stephen S. Kelley ◽  
James D. McMillan ◽  
Nandan Padukone
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document