Local infiltration analgesia or femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind study

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ján Kuchálik ◽  
Anders Magnuson ◽  
Anders Lundin ◽  
Anil Gupta

AbstractBackground and aimsSeveral methods for pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been described but the best postoperative pain management technique remains uncertain. We compared surgeon applied local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with anaesthesiologist performed femoral nerve block (FNB) using ultrasound. The primary aim was to assess pain intensity 24 h after THA.MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind study, 56 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing THA consented to participate. In Group FNB, patients received an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block using 30 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml (225 mg) while Group LIA received a similar volume of saline. Spinal anaesthesia was then performed and bupivacaine heavy, 3–3.5 ml injected depending on patient characteristics. During surgery, patients in Group LIA received a mixture of 300 mg (150 ml) ropivacaine, ketorolac 30 mg (1 ml) and adrenaline 0.5 mg (0.5 ml) (total volume 151.5 ml) peri-articularly and subcutaneously while Group FNB received 151.5 ml of saline peri-articularly in a systematic way by the surgeon. A multi-hole catheter was placed with the tip placed intra-articularly at the end of surgery in both groups. After 23 h, the LIA mixture consisting of 20 ml ropivacaine (7.5 mg/ml), ketorolac 30 mg (1 ml), adrenaline 0.1 mg (1 ml) (total volume 22 ml) was injected in Group LIA and the same volume of saline in Group FNB. Postoperative pain, analgesic consumption (postoperative and post-discharge), side effects, home discharge, quality of life and hip function were recorded, the latter up to 6 months after surgery.ResultsPostoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in Group LIA compared to Group FNB during mobilization at 24 h (primary endpoint), mean difference 1.8 NRS units (95% CI 0.7–2.9) (P = 0.006), at rest after 4 h (P = 0.029) and on standing after 24 (P = 0.0003) and 48 h (P = 0.043). Rescue morphine consumption was also significantly lower in Group LIA during 0–24, mean difference 13.5 mg (95% CI, 6.1–20.9) (P = 0.002) postoperatively. Motor block was greater at 6 h (P = 0.029) postoperatively in Group FNB. Two patients (one in each group) had persistent post-surgical pain (NRS > 3) at 3 months (3.6%) but none at 6 month. No other differences were found between the groups.ConclusionLocal infiltration analgesia significantly reduces pain intensity on standing and mobilization, and rescue analgesic consumption compared to femoral nerve block without causing significant side effects. The superior analgesia in the LIA group may result from the secondary injection at 23 h postoperatively and needs to be furtherevaluated in future studies. No differences were found in home discharge, quality of life and hip dysfunction between the groups.ImplicationLocal infiltration analgesia is the preferred method for postoperative pain management following THA compared to single-shot femoral nerve block.© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

2019 ◽  
pp. 268-273
Author(s):  
Rohit Kumar Varshney ◽  
Mukesh Kumar Prasad ◽  
Megha Garg

Background & Objective: Local infiltration of knee joints during knee joint surgery has been used for postoperative analgesia with preservation of motor function of quadriceps muscle, which helps in early mobilization. Femoral nerve block has been incriminated with paralyses of vastus medialis muscle. We aimed to compare postoperative analgesia between femoral nerve block and local infiltration in patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methodology: After obtaining institutional ethical approval and written informed consent from the patients, this randomized controlled trial was conducted at Department of Anesthesia at Teerthankar Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre between July - December 2018. The study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I and II, undergoing unilateral total TKA. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group FB patients underwent femoral nerve block, and Group LI patients underwent local infiltration analgesia. Sedation score, numeric rating scale, motor power and frequency of nausea/vomiting were recorded and statistical analysis done.Results: We observed better pain relief in patients which received femoral nerve block as compared to local infiltration analgesia (p < 0.001). Sedation score was higher in Group LI and was statistically significant between the two groups at 4th, 12th, and 48th hour (p < 0.05). Group FB patients were associated with higher muscle power grades (p < 0.001) as compared to local infiltration analgesia patients. Fentanyl demand was observed to be lesser in Group FB as compared to Group LI (p < 0.001).Conclusion: The study concludes that femoral nerve block produces better pain reliefin patients posted for unilateral knee arthroplasty as compared to local infiltration ofthe local anesthetic solution. However, there is gross reduction in range of motion withfemoral nerve block.Citation: Varshney RK, Prasad MK, Garg M. Comparison of continuous femoral nerve block with local infiltration for postoperative analgesia in unilateral total knee arthroplasty - a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth pain & intensive care 2019;23(3):268-273


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Najfeld ◽  
Robert Hube ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Kujat ◽  
Hermann Otto Mayr ◽  
Kathi Thiele

Abstract Purpose In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in local infiltration analgesia (LIA) as a technique to control postoperative pain. We compared this technique to the gold standard the 3 in 1 femoral nerve block (FNB) in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a large patient population. This trial analyzes in the early postoperative phase the pain, range of motion, and consumption of pain medications after TKA. Methods We conducted a retrospective trial that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA by one single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center in 2015. Patients who have secondary osteoarthritis due to rheumatoid arthritis or previous knee arthrotomy, as well as revision cases, were excluded. The included patients were divided into 2 groups according to the applied pain management (group 1 FNB, group 2 LIA). Concerning the LIA group, a modified form of composition compared to the first describer without the use of adrenaline was carried out. Post-operative additional pain medications were given on a fixed scheme to the patient. The primary outcome was pain at rest over 7 days after surgery labeled by the numeric pain rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcome measures were the total amount of opioid consumption over the hospital stay and the additional need for non-opioid medication. The conversion of the opiate medications on the morphine preparation was carried out according to the conversion data from the literature. For functional recovery, we compared the range of motion in both groups, which was recorded from the second postoperative day by the attending physiotherapist. Results In total, 202 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this clinical trial. Hundred patients were allocated to the continuous FNB group (group 1) and 102 patients to the LIA group (group 2). No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: The LIA group had a significantly lower NRS score than the continuous FNB group for the measurement in the morning on days 1, 2, and 3 after surgery (day 1, 1.5; day 2, 1.6; day 3, 1.3; p < 0.05). Secondary outcome measurements: The total volume of morphine consumption for the first six postoperative days was significantly lower in the LIA group than the FNB group (FNB 159.8 vs. LIA 96.07). There is also a significant difference between the total morphine consumption of both groups in the direct postoperative course with respect to time and group (two way ANOVA, p < 0.05) On the day of the operation and on the first postoperative day, the intake of additional non-opioids in the LIA group was also significantly reduced compared to the FNB group. No significant difference was observed on the second to sixth postoperative day concerning an additional consumption of non-opioid medications. In terms of range of motion, the LIA group showed a higher active range of motion at the operated extremity than the FNB group during the hospital stay. Conclusion The local intraarticular infiltration therapy (LIA) is a sufficient alternative to regional anesthesia avoiding the known risks of regional procedures. The results of this study reflect the efficiency of this pain management with a lower consumption of analgesics, identical to reduced postoperative pain ratings and an improved ROM in the first postoperative days. Level of evidence Retrospective trial


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document