P41. Two Year Clinical Results of X-Stop Interspinous Decompression Device in the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Canal Stenosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 121S-122S
Author(s):  
Anjali Nandakumar ◽  
Natasha Annette Clark ◽  
Naval Bilolikar ◽  
Agata Pawulska ◽  
Alexandru Mertic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis

Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Spine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunao Tanaka ◽  
Kanichiro Wada ◽  
Gentaro Kumagai ◽  
Toru Asari ◽  
Shuichi Aburakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Surgical Methods

Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Tanaka ◽  
Kazuyoshi Nakanishi ◽  
Naosuke Kamei ◽  
Risako Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Nakamae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Multiple Level ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Unilateral Approach ◽  
Canal Stenosis

scholarly journals Clinical Results of Extensive Decompressive Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (0) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Hidaka ◽  
Young Hwan Koh ◽  
Hiromichi Hosoda
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Decompressive Laminectomy ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis

scholarly journals Clinical results of partial facetectomy for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.

1986 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 871-873
Author(s):  
Tadashi Egawa ◽  
Kunio Tomonaga ◽  
Tsukasa Kondo ◽  
Hiroaki Fujii ◽  
Takashi Hiramatsu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis

scholarly journals The value of cervical MRI in surgical lumbar canal stenosis patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Youssef Abdalla ◽  
Hieder Al-Shami ◽  
Heba Medhat Maghraby ◽  
Abdelrhman Enayet
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Cervical Canal ◽  
Lumbar Stenosis ◽  
Cervical Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Canal Stenosis ◽  
Cervical Canal Stenosis ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Tandem Spinal Stenosis ◽  
A Prospective Study

Abstract Background The prevalence of cervical canal stenosis alone is estimated to be present in 4.9% of the adult population. Co-existence of dual pathology may complicate clinical presentation and necessitates a wise and individually based decision process. Objectives To estimate the co-existence of cervical canal stenosis in surgical lumbar canal stenosis patients and its reflection on decision-making regarding surgery. Methods It is a prospective study that was conducted on 70 cases with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis by investigating them for cervical canal stenosis clinically and radiologically. Results The co-existence of cervical and lumbar canal stenoses was seen in 62 cases (88.57%); cases with relative cervical stenosis were 25 (35.714%) and absolute cervical stenosis was 37 (52.857%). Cases with no cervical stenosis were 8 (11.428%) and cases with relative lumbar stenosis were 22 (31.428%), while cases with absolute lumbar stenosis were 48 (68.571%). Cases with symptomatic cervical canal stenosis were 30 (42.857%). Cases with asymptomtic cervical canal stenosis were 32 (45.71%). Conclusion Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is not uncommon and MRI cervical spine should be done for every lumbar canal stenosis patient especially if indicated by history or clinical examination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document