Effect of Novel Unconstrained-Type Artificial Disc in Hybrid Cervical Surgery in Terms of Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Motion Preservation

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. S116-S117
Author(s):  
Jung-Woo Hur
Keyword(s):  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Motion Preservation ◽  
Cervical Surgery

Artificial Disc Versus Fusion: Effect on Three-Dimensional Dynamic In Vivo Cervical Spine Motion

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin P. McDonald ◽  
Michael J. McDonald ◽  
Nicole L. Ramo ◽  
Stephen W. Bartol ◽  
Michael J. Bey
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Adjacent Disc ◽  
Spine Motion

Intervertebral disc degeneration in the cervical spine is a common condition that often manifests as cervical disc disease, resulting in pain, motor weakness and sensory deficits. The most common surgical treatment strategy involves removal of the diseased disc and fusion of the adjacent vertebrae. Although fusion typically relieves symptoms at the surgical site, evidence of degeneration in the adjacent disc has been reported in 25–92% of patients [1,2]. It has been hypothesized that the progression of adjacent segment degeneration is a result of increased motion at the segments adjacent to the site of fusion [3]. As a response to this proposed mechanism of degeneration, artificial discs were designed with the goals of preserving motion at the operative site and maintaining normal motion in the adjacent segments. However, the extent to which normal adjacent segment motion is maintained in artificial disc patients compared to fusion patients remains unknown. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the dynamic, three-dimensional (3D) motion of the cervical spine in fusion patients and artificial disc replacement patients.

scholarly journals Association between sagittal balance and adjacent segment degeneration in anterior cervical surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yijian Zhang ◽  
Yijie Shao ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Junxin Zhang ◽  
Fan He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Balance ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Cervical Surgery ◽  
Anterior Cervical Surgery ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background ASD is a relatively common degenerative alteration after cervical surgery which occurs above or below the fused segment. In addition, some patients may need reoperation to treat severe ASD after the primary surgery. It was considered that sagittal balance is correlated with postoperative clinical outcomes; however, few studies have reported the influence of sagittal balance on ASD. The present study is designed to investigate whether sagittal balance impacts the pathology of adjacent segment disease (ASD) in patients who undergo anterior cervical surgery for degenerative cervical disease. Methods Databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were used to search for literature published before June 2018. Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform the statistical analysis. Sagittal balance parameters before and after surgery were compared between patients with and without ASD. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was summarized for continuous data and P < 0.05 was set for the level of significance. Results A total of 221 patients with ASD and 680 patients without ASD from seven articles were studied in this meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in most sagittal balance parameters between the two groups, except for postoperative cervical lordosis (CL) (WMD -3.30, CI -5.91, − 0.69, P = 0.01). Conclusions Some sagittal balance parameters may be associated with the development of ASD after anterior cervical surgery. Sufficient restoration of CL may decrease the incidence of ASD. The results in present study needed to be expanded carefully and further high-quality studies are warranted to investigate the impact of sagittal balance on ASD.

Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1522-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aixing Pan ◽  
Yong Hai ◽  
Jincai Yang ◽  
Lijin Zhou ◽  
Xiaolong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Fusion ◽  
Motion Preservation ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

scholarly journals Hybrid Strategy of Cervical Artificial Disc and Intervertebral Cage – Biomechanical Effects on the Adjacent Tissues and Implants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Tsao Chung ◽  
Dueng-Yuan Hueng ◽  
Chi-Pin Hsu ◽  
Chun-Ming Chen ◽  
Shang-Chih Lin
Keyword(s):  
Element Model ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Peek Cage ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Hybrid Surgery ◽  
Hybrid Strategy ◽  
Intervertebral Cage ◽  
Adjacent Segments ◽  
Nonlinear Finite Element Model

Abstract Background: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a concern in multi-level ACDF surgery. Hybrid surgery with C-ADR and ACDF are an alternative treatment to reduce the level of increased rigidity, but biomechanical differences between strategies using one C-ADR and two ACDFs have not been thoroughly investigated.Methods: To evaluate the placement-related effects of using one cervical artificial disc replacement (C-ADR) and two anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on tissue responses and implant behavior. A nonlinear finite element model from the C2 to the T1 vertebrae was developed. Ligament interconnection, follower loads, and weight compression were used to simulate cervical flexion. Within the C4-C7 segments, two placements of one C-ADR and two ACDFs were arranged: PAP (peek cage, artificial disc, and peek cage) and APP.Results: Both PAP and APP consistently induced kinematic and mechanical redistribution to adjacent segments. The C-ADR served as a buffer of the compensated motion and stress from the ACDF segments. The motion and stress of the cranial C2-C3 and C3-C4 segments were greater for the PAP than the APP constructs. However, the caudal C7-T1 segment of the APP construct was more flexed and stressed. Serially stacked cages of the APP placement increased bone-cage stresses, potentially inducing subsidence and loosening. The sandwiched C-ADR of the PAP construct accommodated the compensated motion and stress from the adjacent ACDFs more than the APP construct.Conclusions: The PAP and APP placements cause more severe ASD progression at the cranial and caudal segments, respectively. The PAP placement is preferred for concerns regarding ACDF and postoperative degeneration of caudal segments. The APP placement is recommended when C-ADR failure and ASD progression are considered.

scholarly journals Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C(r) over 3-years

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reginald Davis ◽  
Pierce Dalton Nunley ◽  
Kee Kim ◽  
Michael Hisey ◽  
Hyun Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Total Disc Replacement ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Disc Replacement ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Surgery Rates

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two-level total disc replacement (TDR) using a Mobi-C(r) Cervical Artificial Disc at the 36 month follow-up. Methods: a Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial of an artificial cervical disc (Mobi-C(r) Cervical Artificial Disc) was conducted under the Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. A total of 339 patients with degenerative disc disease were enrolled to receive either two-level treatment with TDR, or a two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as control. The 234 TDR patients and 105 ACDF patients were followed up at regular time points for three years after surgery. Results: At 36 months, both groups demonstrated an improvement in clinical outcome measures and a comparable safety profile. NDI scores, SF-12 PCS scores, patient satisfaction, and overall success indicated greater statistically significant improvement from baseline for the TDR group, in comparison to the ACDF group. The TDR patients experienced lower subsequent surgery rates and a lower rate of adjacent segment degeneration. On average, the TDR patients maintained segmental range of motion through 36 months with no device failure. Conclusion: Results at three-years support TDR as a safe, effective and statistically superior alternative to ACDF for the treatment of degenerative disc disease at two contiguous cervical levels.

scholarly journals Revision Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration after Initial Anterior Cervical Fusion: Is ROI-C Better than Plate-Cage Construct?

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Junjie Niu ◽  
Dawei Song ◽  
Yijie Liu ◽  
Heng Wang ◽  
Cheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Disc Degeneration ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Cervical Surgery ◽  
Cage Group

The optimal revision surgical strategy for patients who develop symptomatic adjacent segment disc degeneration (ASD) is controversial. The risks of intraoperative complications, especially the incidence of dysphagia, were relatively high for revision surgeries. This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of revision surgery using a traditional plate-cage construct and zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) device in treating symptomatic ASD after initial anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Forty-two patients who developed symptomatic ASD were retrospectively analyzed and classified into two groups (plate-cage group and ROI-C group). The clinical and radiological results were compared. We further evaluated the complication of dysphagia and dysphagia-related risk factors in these patients. The JOA and NDI scores, C2-7 lordotic angle, and intervertebral space height were significantly improved after revision surgery in both groups. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss both significantly decreased in the ROI-C group. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was much lower in the ROI-C group than in the plate-cage group (18.75% vs. 57.69%; P = 0.01 ). The presence of dysphagia after initial surgery ( P = 0.003 ) and revision surgery type ( P = 0.01 ) was significantly related to the presence of dysphagia after revision surgery. These results indicated that both the plate-cage construct and ROI-C are effective in treating symptomatic ASD. However, compared with the traditional plate-cage construct, ROI-C with less operative time, less blood loss, and lower incidence of dysphagia is more suitable. Furthermore, ROI-C should preferably be used for patients who present with dysphagia after initial cervical surgery. This study will provide clinical guidance for spinal surgeons to choose the zero-profile device in treating specific and complicated cases, which will significantly improve the therapeutic efficacy of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration.

Case Example: Adjacent Segment Disease: What Is It, and How Is It Rated?

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment Disease ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Disc Space Narrowing ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

Abstract The incidence of cervical and lumbar fusion surgery has increased in the past twenty years, and during follow-up some of these patients develop changes at the adjacent segment. Recognizing that adjacent segment degeneration and disease may occur in the future does not alter the rating for a cervical or lumbar fusion at the time the patient's condition is determined to be at maximum medical improvement (MMI). The term adjacent segment degeneration refers to the presence of radiographic findings of degenerative disc disease, including disc space narrowing, instability, and so on at the motion segment above or below a cervical or lumbar fusion. Adjacent segment disease refers to the development of new clinical symptoms that correspond to these changes on imaging. The biomechanics of adjacent segment degeneration have been studied, and, although the exact mechanism is uncertain, genetics may play a role. Findings associated with adjacent segment degeneration include degeneration of the facet joints with hypertrophy and thickening of the ligamentum flavum, disc space collapse, and translation—but the clinical significance of these radiographic degenerative changes remains unclear, particularly in light of the known presence of abnormal findings in asymptomatic patients. Evaluators should not rate an individual in anticipation of the development of changes at the level above a fusion, although such a development is a recognized possibility.

Obesity may be associated with adjacent-segment degeneration after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in spinopelvic-mismatched patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Ping-Guo Duan ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Minghao Wang ◽  
Andrew K. Chan ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Surgery Rates

OBJECTIVEIn this study, the authors’ aim was to investigate whether obesity affects surgery rates for adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis.METHODSPatients who underwent single-level TLIF for spondylolisthesis at the University of California, San Francisco, from 2006 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were a minimum 2-year follow-up, single-level TLIF, and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Exclusion criteria were trauma, tumor, infection, multilevel fusions, non-TLIF fusions, or less than a 2-year follow-up. Patient demographic data were collected, and an analysis of spinopelvic parameters was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: mismatched, or pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) ≥ 10°; and balanced, or PI-LL < 10°. Within the two groups, the patients were further classified by BMI (< 30 and ≥ 30 kg/m2). Patients were then evaluated for surgery for ASD, matched by BMI and PI-LL parameters.RESULTSA total of 190 patients met inclusion criteria (72 males and 118 females, mean age 59.57 ± 12.39 years). The average follow-up was 40.21 ± 20.42 months (range 24–135 months). In total, 24 patients (12.63% of 190) underwent surgery for ASD. Within the entire cohort, 82 patients were in the mismatched group, and 108 patients were in the balanced group. Within the mismatched group, adjacent-segment surgeries occurred at the following rates: BMI < 30 kg/m2, 2.1% (1/48); and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, 17.6% (6/34). Significant differences were seen between patients with BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30 (p = 0.018). A receiver operating characteristic curve for BMI as a predictor for ASD was established, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.49–0.90). The optimal BMI cutoff value determined by the Youden index is 29.95 (sensitivity 0.857; specificity 0.627). However, in the balanced PI-LL group (108/190 patients), there was no difference in surgery rates for ASD among the patients with different BMIs (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSIn patients who have a PI-LL mismatch, obesity may be associated with an increased risk of surgery for ASD after TLIF, but in obese patients without PI-LL mismatch, this association was not observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document