Dual Pitch Screw Design Provides Equivalent Fixation to Upsized Screw Diameter in Revision Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

Author(s):  
Ryan Weegens ◽  
Leah Y. Carreon ◽  
Michael Voor ◽  
Jeffrey L. Gum ◽  
Joseph L. Laratta ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. S56
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Laratta ◽  
Ryan Weegens ◽  
Jeffrey L. Gum ◽  
Michael J. Voor ◽  
Leah Y. Carreon ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. S77-S82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Worawat Limthongkul ◽  
Jason Savage ◽  
Emmanuel K. Nenonene ◽  
Eldin E. Karaikovic

The pedicle screw diameter, composite and design are variables that can affect the threshold of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring. Even though we know that larger diameter objects tend to have less resistance, no study documented the effect that this variable could have on pedicle screw resistance. Using high quality equipment, resistance and resistivity of ten pedicle screws (from four manufacturers) were calculated based on known constant current and measured voltage. Voltage was measured three times for each screw to determine intraobserver measurement variability. Resistance of all screws ranged from 1.4 to 3.9 m ohm (mean = 2.69+/-0.71 m ohm). The screw with largest diameter (7.75 mm) had lower resistance than screws with other diameters. Resistivity of screws ranged from 7.12 to 12.63 micro ohm*m (mean = 9.9+/-1.82 micro ohm*m). Based on the screw design, one manufacturer's pedicle screws (A) had significantly lower resistivity compared to three other manufacturers (p<0.01). Larger diameter screws (7.75 mm in diameter) had lower resistance. Screw design (polyaxial or monoaxial) had no effect on its resistance. Screws of one manufacturer (A) showed lower resistivity compared to those manufactured by other three companies.


Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 2530-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Emre Acaroglu ◽  
Joe Lee ◽  
Masaru Fujita ◽  
Serena Hu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chen-Chiang Lin ◽  
Kun-Jhih Lin ◽  
Wen-Chuan Chen ◽  
Hung-Wen Wei ◽  
Kang-Ping Lin ◽  
...  

AbstractHeadless compression screws (HCSs) are commonly utilized devices for small bone fracture fixation. The Mini-Acutrak 2 and headless reduction (HLR) screws are the newer version types, in which both have fully threaded and variable pitch design. Specifically, the HLR is characterized by two thread runouts to facilitate implantation. With the thread runouts, the holding strength of the screw may be compromised. To the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the pullout force of the global sizes of a HCS. We sought to determine the pullout strength of the HLR and compare the strength of this screw with that of the Mini-Acutrak 2. Synthetic bone blocks with simulated transverse fractures were used to conduct the tests. Four commonly used sizes of the HLR were examined, and one Mini-Acutrak 2 was employed for comparison. Five screws of each size were tested. The pullout force of all screws that were tested in this study ranged from 45.23 to 233.22 N. The results revealed that the pullout force increased as the screw diameter increased. Interestingly, we found that one small screw outperformed the Mini-Acutrak 2, which has a larger diameter. This study provided extensive knowledge regarding the pullout strength of fully threaded HCSs of different sizes. An unexpected finding is that a small screw has higher holding power than a large one because of its increased number of threads. Therefore, we suggest that the thread number should be a critical consideration for the design of size distribution of HCSs.


2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Kye-Nam Cho ◽  
Hyung-Ku Yoon ◽  
Ho-Seung Jeon ◽  
Seung-Ju Jeon ◽  
Jae-Ho Choi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document