Adaptive decision-making for civil infrastructure systems and communities exposed to evolving risks

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Yun Lee ◽  
Henry V. Burton ◽  
David Lallemant
2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shovini Dasgupta ◽  
Edwin K.L Tam

Much of the focus on sustainable infrastructure has concentrated on buildings and construction processes. To advance this thinking for other civil infrastructure systems (CIS), this paper outlines a framework that uses a set of proposed indicators to measure the sustainability of chosen infrastructure options and help select the preferred alternative in a multiobjective decision approach. Physically implementing "sustainable infrastructure" involves three life stages for any project: preproject planning, project implementation, and ongoing operations. It is critical to evaluate the sustainability of chosen options in each of these life stages. This research develops two categories of indicators, mandatory screening indicators (MSI) and judgment indicators (JI), and a multilayer approach for incorporating these indicators. A normalization procedure has been adapted to work within the framework to help compare alternatives across a range of indicators and different orders of data magnitude. A hypothetical example using a transmission line corridor is presented to illustrate how the framework can be applied.Key words: indicators, infrastructure, sustainable, environment, decision making, alternatives.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Pleban ◽  
Jennifer S. Tucker ◽  
Vanessa Johnson Katie /Gunther ◽  
Thomas R. Graves

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2963
Author(s):  
Hyun Myung ◽  
Yang Wang

For several decades, various sensors and sensing systems have been developed for smart cities and civil infrastructure systems [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3133
Author(s):  
Rita Der Sarkissian ◽  
Anas Dabaj ◽  
Youssef Diab ◽  
Marc Vuillet

A limited number of studies in the scientific literature discuss the “Build-Back-Better” (BBB) critical infrastructure (CI) concept. Investigations of its operational aspects and its efficient implementation are even rarer. The term “Better” in BBB is often confusing to practitioners and leads to unclear and non-uniform objectives for guiding accurate decision-making. In an attempt to fill these gaps, this study offers a conceptual analysis of BBB’s operational aspects by examining the term “Better”. In its methodological approach, this study evaluates the state of Saint-Martin’s CI before and after Hurricane Irma and, accordingly, reveals the indicators to assess during reconstruction projects. The proposed methods offer practitioners a guidance tool for planning efficient BBB CI projects or for evaluating ongoing programs through the established BBB evaluation grid. Key findings of the study offer insights and a new conceptual equation of the BBB CI by revealing the holistic and interdisciplinary connotations behind the term “Better” CI: “Build-Back-resilient”, “Build-Back-sustainable”, and “Build-Back-accessible to all and upgraded CI”. The proposed explanations can facilitate the efficient application of BBB for CI by operators, stakeholders, and practitioners and can help them to contextualize the term “Better” with respect to their area and its CI systems.


1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Gregan‐Paxton ◽  
Deborah Roedder John

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 825-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiwei Chen ◽  
Jiaxi Wang ◽  
Robert M. Kirk ◽  
Olivia L. Pethtel ◽  
Allison E. Kiefner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document