Corrigendum to “The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ emotional intelligence and their self-efficacy in language institutes” [System 37(4) (2009) 708–718]

System ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Moafian ◽  
Afsaneh Ghanizadeh
Author(s):  
Jahanbakhsh Nikoopour ◽  
Mohammad Amini Farsani ◽  
Mohammad Tajbakhsh ◽  
Seyedeh Hoda Sadat Kiyaie

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 853-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yefei Wang ◽  
Guangrong Xie ◽  
Xilong Cui

We examined the impacts of emotional intelligence and self-leadership on coping with stress, and assessing the mediating roles that positive affect and self-efficacy play in this process. Participants were 575 students at 2 Chinese universities, who completed measures of coping with stress, self-leadership, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and positive affect. The structural equation model analysis results indicated that self-efficacy fully mediated the relationship between emotional intelligence and active coping, as we had predicted. Further, self-leadership had a direct effect on active coping. However, positive affect and self-efficacy did not mediate the relationship between self-leadership and coping with stress. Implications are discussed in terms of theoretical contributions and interventions for coping with stress.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 3950
Author(s):  
David Aparisi ◽  
Lucía Granados ◽  
Ricardo Sanmartín ◽  
María Carmen Martínez-Monteagudo ◽  
José Manuel García-Fernández

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI), generativity and self-efficacy, identifying different profiles of emotional intelligence. 834 secondary school teachers participated in the study by completing the Trait Meta-Mood Scale–24 (TMMS–24), the Loyola Generativity Scale and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Cluster analysis identified four EI profiles: the first with high scores in attention and low scores in repair, the second with high scores in all dimensions of EI, the third with low scores in all EI dimensions and a fourth profile with low scores in attention and high scores in repair. Results showed significant statistical differences between the EI profiles found and the different dimensions of generativity and self-efficacy. Logistic regression analysis showed that EI was a statistically significant predictor of generativity, since teachers with high EI scores were more likely to present high scores in positive generativity and self-efficacy and lower probability of presenting high scores in generative doubts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document