Learning curves in fiberoptic intubation of trainees from fidiva training program

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Sara Martinez Castro ◽  
Luis Hurtado Palma ◽  
Laura Reviriego Agudo ◽  
Pedro Charco Mora
Author(s):  
Rodrigo TEJOS ◽  
Rubén AVILA ◽  
Martin INZUNZA ◽  
Pablo ACHURRA ◽  
Richard CASTILLO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: A General Surgery Residency may last between 2-6 years, depending on the country. A shorter General Surgery Residency must optimize residents’ surgical exposure. Simulated surgical training is known to shorten the learning curves, but information related to how it affects a General Surgery Residency regarding clinical exposure is scarce. Aim: To analyze the effect of introducing a validated laparoscopic simulated training program in abdominal procedures performed by residents in a three-year General Surgery Residency program. Methods: A non-concurrent cohort study was designed. Four-generations (2012-2015) of graduated surgeons were included. Only abdominal procedures in which the graduated surgeons were the primary surgeon were described and analyzed. The control group was of graduated surgeons from 2012 without the laparoscopic simulated training program. Surgical procedures per program year, surgical technique, emergency/elective intervention and hospital-site (main/community hospitals) were described. Results: Interventions of 28 graduated surgeons were analyzed (control group=5; laparoscopic simulated training program=23). Graduated surgeons performed a mean of 372 abdominal procedures, with a higher mean number of medium-to-complex procedures in laparoscopic simulated training program group (48 vs. 30, p=0.02). Graduated surgeons trained with laparoscopic simulated training program performed a higher number of total abdominal procedures (384 vs. 319, p=0.04) and laparoscopic procedures (183 vs. 148, p<0.05). Conclusions: The introduction of laparoscopic simulated training program may increase the number and complexity of total and laparoscopic procedures in a three-year General Surgery Residency.


1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1101-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. F. D. Cole ◽  
J. S. Mallon ◽  
S. H. Rolbin ◽  
C. Ananthanarayan

Background There is no consensus about the best way to teach fiberoptic intubation. This study assesses the effectiveness of a training program in which novice anesthetic residents routinely were taught fiberoptic tracheal intubation of anesthetized, paralyzed, apneic patients. Methods Eight inexperienced anesthetic residents learned fiberoptic and conventional tracheal intubation simultaneously during their first 4 months of training. All intubations were performed using general anesthesia and muscle paralysis. Of these intubations, 223 (23%) were fiberoptic and 743 (77%) were laryngoscopic. Subsequently, their intubation skills with the two techniques were studied in a prospective, single-blind randomized trial involving 131 elective patients. Intubation times, SpO2, ETCO2, hemodynamic changes on intubation, and complications were recorded for 71 fiberoptic and 57 laryngoscopic intubations. Results There were two failures of the rigid and one failure of the fiberoptic technique due to inability to intubate within 180 s. In cases of failure, the tracheas were intubated successfully after mask ventilation by the alterative technique. No hypoxemia or hypercarbia occurred in any patient. There were no differences in hemodynamic indexes nor incidence of sore throat or hoarseness between the two groups. Mean intubation times were 56 +/- 24 s (mean +/- SD) for fiberoptic and 34 +/- 10 s (mean +/- SD) for laryngoscopic (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Novices taught fiberoptic intubation and rigid laryngoscopic intubation under similar conditions, with similar volumes of experience, learn both techniques well. The safety and effectiveness of this training regimen commend it for inclusion in any residency program.


2018 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Ryul Oh ◽  
Kyung Su Han ◽  
Chang Won Hong ◽  
Byung Chang Kim ◽  
Bun Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Laura Reviriego Agudo ◽  
Luis Hurtado Palma ◽  
Sara Martinez Castro ◽  
Pedro Charco Mora

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (05) ◽  
pp. 280-285
Author(s):  
Mark K. Soliman ◽  
Alison J. Tammany

AbstractRobotic surgery is becoming more popular among practicing physicians as a new modality with improved visualization and mobility (1–2). As patients also desire minimally invasive procedures with quicker recoveries, there is a desire for new surgical residents and fellows to pursue robotic techniques in training (3–4). To develop a new colorectal robotics training program, an institution needs a well-formulated plan for the trainees and mentors with realistic expectations. The development of a robotics training program has potential obstacles, including increased initial cost, longer operative times, and overcoming learning curves. We have devised a four-phase training protocol for residents in colorectal surgical fellowship. Each of these phases attempts to create a curricular framework that outlines logical progression and sets expectations for trainees, Program Directors, and residency faculty. Phase zero begins prior to fellowship and is preparatory. Phase one focuses on an introduction to robotics with learning bedside console troubleshooting and simulation exercises. Phase Two prioritizes operative experience and safety while completing steps independently in a progressive fashion. Phase Three polishes the resident prior to graduation for future practice. We recommend frequent evaluation and open-mindedness while establishing a focused robotics program. The end goal is to graduate fellows with an equivalency certificate who can continue to practice colorectal robotic surgery.


1971 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 641-641
Author(s):  
SJ Gibbs ◽  
L Zucker
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document