Fluorescence self-quenching assay for the detection of target collagen sequences using a short probe peptide

Talanta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 492-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linge Nian ◽  
Yue Hu ◽  
Caihong Fu ◽  
Chen Song ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nano Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1862-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Capilli ◽  
Simone Cavalera ◽  
Laura Anfossi ◽  
Cristina Giovannoli ◽  
Marco Minella ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 55 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 758-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janina Gabrielska ◽  
Teresa Kral ◽  
Marek Langner ◽  
Stanislaw Przestalski

Abstract Phenyltins are chemicals widely used in industry, hence their occurrence in the human environment is frequent and widespread. Such compounds include hydrophobic phenyl rings bonded to positively charged tin. This molecular structure makes them capable of adsorbing onto and penetrating through biological membranes, hence they are potentially hazardous. Two such compounds, diphenyltin and triphenyltin, show different steric constraints when interacting with the lipid bilayer. It has been demonstrated that these compounds are positioned at different locations within model lipid bilayers, causing dissimilarity in their ability to affect membrane properties. In this paper we present a study regarding the ability of these two phenyltins to facilitate the transport of S2O4-2 ions across the lipid bilayer, evaluated by a fluorescence quenching assay. In concentration range of up-to 60 μm those compounds do not affect lipid bilayer topology, when evaluated by vesicle size distribution. Both phenyltins facilitate the transfer of S2O4-2 across the model lipid bilayer, but the dependence of dithionite transport on phenyltin concentration is different for both. In principle, above 20 μm triphenyltin is more efficient in transfering ions across the lipid bilayer than diphenyltin.


2005 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bergen ◽  
S. P. Miller ◽  
I. B. Mandell ◽  
W. M. Robertson

Pre-slaughter ultrasound and whole side dissection data from 47 crossbred bulls were used to assess (1) the relative value of six previously published equations based on live animal measurements, (2) the value of alternative pre-slaughter measurements, and (3) the value of alternative ultrasound probes as predictors of whole side lean meat yield. Analysis of absolute bias-corrected residuals indicated that all six previously published equations predicted whole side lean meat yield with similar accuracy (P = 0.62), but analysis of absolute rank residuals indicated that an equation originally based on carcass measurements tended (P = 0.17) to rank bulls less precisely than five ultrasound-based equations. Breed composition, age, liveweight, hip width, heart girth, and round muscle depths did not contribute to new lean meat yield prediction equations (P > 0.10), but height, 12th/13th rib body wall, rump fat, and gluteus medius muscle depths and marbling score did (P < 0.10). However, examination of absolute residuals and absolute rank residuals indicated that accuracy (P = 0.55) and precision (P = 0.64) did not improve significantly compared to equations based only on height, rib fat and longissimus muscle size. Similarly, analysis of absolute residuals and absolute rank residuals indicated that fat and longissimus muscle depth measurements collected with a short probe predicted whole side lean meat yield as accurately and precisely as measurements collected with a long probe. Results indicated that (1) equations based on live measurements may provide more precise predictions of lean meat yield than equations derived from carcass measurements, (2) supplementing ultrasonic rib fat and longissimus muscle measurements with additional ultrasound measurements did not improve the accuracy or precision of lean meat yield prediction, and (3) lean meat yield of yearling bulls can be accurately predicted using fat and longissimus muscle depth measurements collected with a short probe. Key words: Ultrasound, beef bulls, carcass composition, prediction models


1994 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 2943-2943
Author(s):  
Brent W. Edwards ◽  
Neal F. Viemeister
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document