Developing data literacy: Investigating the effects of a pre-service data use intervention

2022 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 103569
Author(s):  
Katherine L. Miller-Bains ◽  
Julie Cohen ◽  
Vivian C. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Data Use ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-50
Author(s):  
Ellen B. Mandinach ◽  
Jeremy M. Friedman ◽  
Edith S. Gummer

Background With the growing emphasis for educators to use data to inform their practice, little has been done to consider the means by which the educators can acquire the requisite data literacy skills. This article provides a context for why schools of education can and must play an important role in preparing teachers to use data. Purpose This article sought to understand if and how schools of education are preparing teacher candidates to use data effectively or responsibly. The study examined the extent to which schools of education teach stand-alone courses on data-driven decision making or integrate data use concepts into existing courses. It also examined state licensure and certification requirements to determine if and how data use is included in documentation. Population A stratified randomized sample of schools of education was drawn with 208 institutions responding, representing a 25.7% response rate. Research Design The survey portion of the study consisted of a stratified randomized sample of all schools or departments of education in the United States. The syllabus review was a voluntary part of the survey. The licensure review was a descriptive analysis of every state's documentation for teacher licensure and certification. Findings/Results The survey results indicated that a vast majority of the schools of education reported that they offered a stand-alone data course, and even more integrated data use into existing courses. The syllabus review provided a deeper dive into the course offerings and indicated that the courses were more about assessment literacy than data literacy. The licensure review yielded a plethora of skills and knowledge related to data that are included in state requirements. However, there was wide variation across states in their requirements. Conclusions Even though schools of education reported that they are teaching about data-driven decision making in their teacher preparation programs, the results indicate that the content is more about assessment literacy than data literacy. This finding is consistent with the often observed conflation of the two constructs. Licensure requirements include both data literacy and assessment literacy, but the emphasis is more on assessment than data. With the increasing emphasis by policy makers on the importance of educators using data, it is essential that schools of education begin to incorporate data concepts into their curricula and that states make explicit the data-related skills and knowledge required for teachers for licensure and certification.


2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen B. Mandinach ◽  
Brennan M. Parton ◽  
Edith S. Gummer ◽  
Rachel Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Data Use ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Ebbeler ◽  
Cindy L. Poortman ◽  
Kim Schildkamp ◽  
Jules M. Pieters
Keyword(s):  
Data Use ◽  

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Jacobs ◽  
Angela Gregory ◽  
David Hoppey ◽  
Diane Yendol-Hoppey

Seminar.net ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Dander

Numerical data are becoming one of the dominant codes for describing society. Public services are sharing Open Government Data (OGD) as public goods. Academic interest so far has focused on political, technical and organizational implications. Educational research has been widely neglecting OGD. I argue that contemporary media pedagogy needs to productively and critically consider this development in research and practice, engaging with the question of how these data can be turned into knowledge. What objections to OGD as a political project have emerged, and what skills are required by data users? Apart from giving examples of how data use can be learned and supported, this paper illustrates and discusses potentials and risks for OGD use in terms of learning and subject transformation. Various objectives for media pedagogy – such as media, digital and data literacy, numeracy and picturacy – will be discussed in order to draw conclusions on a conceptual level. This paper aims at a differentiated approach to OGD and data education, taking into account their growing importance as well as emerging paradox constellations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen B. Mandinach ◽  
Edith S. Gummer

Data-driven decision making has become increasingly important in education. Policymakers require educators to use data to inform practice. Although the policy emphasis is growing, what has not increased is attention to building human capacity around data use. Educators need to gain data literacy skills to inform practice. Although some professional development opportunities exist for current educators, fewer formal courses and opportunities for data literacy development in schools of education have been developed and implemented. This article explores issues around the growing need for data-driven decision making in programs in schools of education. The issues are complex and the actors needed to bring about change are multiple. A systems perspective to explore course and programmatic implementation is presented.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilma B. Kippers ◽  
Cindy L. Poortman ◽  
Kim Schildkamp ◽  
Adrie J. Visscher
Keyword(s):  
Data Use ◽  

2015 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith S. Gummer ◽  
Ellen B. Mandinach

Background The increasing focus on education as an evidence-based practice requires that educators can effectively use data to inform their practice. At the level of classroom instructional decision making, the nature of the specific knowledge and skills teachers need to use data effectively is complex and not well characterized. Being able to characterize this requisite knowledge and skills supports definition and measurement of data literacy. Evolving from empirical analyses, an emergent conceptual framework of knowledge and skills is proposed for the construct, data literacy for teaching. The framework is based on a domain analysis, which is the first step of an evidence-centered design process for data literacy. The framework is contextualized in existing research, with an objective of having it ground future work in the development of instruments to measure data literacy. Purpose This article reports on work to develop a conceptual framework to undergird research, development, and capacity building around data literacy for teaching. The emergent nature of the framework is intended to inform the discussions around data literacy so that continued refinement of operational definitions of the construct will emerge. Without such operational definitions, measurement of progress toward teacher data literacy is not possible. Research Design The conceptual framework is based on a sequence of qualitative studies that sought to determine the nature of knowledge and skills that are required for teachers to be considered data literate. A first study examined the ways that the knowledge and skills around the use of data were characterized in practical guides, books, and manuals on data use, formative assessment, and related topics. These characteristics were integrated with definitions of data literacy elicited from experts. A second study examined the licensure and certification documents required by states for teacher candidates for their treatment of data- and assessment-related knowledge and skills. The synthesis of these studies and their components have yielded an evolving conceptual framework for a new construct: data literacy for teachers. Conclusions The conceptual framework described in this article reflects an evolving effort to understand what it means for teachers to be data literate—that is, what knowledge and skills are required for teachers to use data effectively and responsibly set within an iterative inquiry cycle. The work posits that the construct comprises three interacting domains (data use for teaching, content knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge), six components of the inquiry cycle (identify problems, frame questions, use data, transform data into information, transform information into a decision, and evaluate outcomes), and, finally, 59 elements of knowledge and skills embedded within those components. However, the complex construct requires additional discussion from policy, research, and practitioners to refine and reorganize it and to expand it beyond a cognitive focus on knowledge and skills to include beliefs/values, identity, and epistemic elements. Next steps will include structuring an ongoing discussion about the nature of the framework and expansion beyond domain analysis through the evidence-centered design process to the development of a suite of instruments to measure the construct.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document