Development of living labs to support gendered energy technology innovation in poor urban environments

2022 ◽  
pp. 101850
Author(s):  
Matia Mukama ◽  
Josephine Kaviti Musango ◽  
Suzanne Smit ◽  
Fabrizio Ceschin ◽  
Aine Petrulaityte
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Sims Gallagher ◽  
Arnulf Grübler ◽  
Laura Kuhl ◽  
Gregory Nemet ◽  
Charlie Wilson

Energy Policy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 591-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Winskel ◽  
Jonathan Radcliffe ◽  
Jim Skea ◽  
Xinxin Wang

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-207
Author(s):  
Darren Sharp ◽  
Rob Raven

Urban living labs have emerged as spatially embedded arenas for governing urban transformation, where heterogenous actor configurations experiment with new practices, institutions, and infrastructures. This article observes a nascent shift towards experimentation at the precinct scale and responds to a need to further investigate relevant processes in urban experimentation at this scale, and identifies particular challenges for urban planning. We tentatively conceptualise precincts as spatially bounded urban environments loosely delineated by a particular combination of social or economic activity. Our methodology involves an interpretive systematic literature review of urban experimentation and urban living labs at precinct scale, along with an empirical illustration of the Net Zero Initiative at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, which is operationalising its main campus into a living lab focussed on precinct-scale decarbonisation. We identify four processual categories relevant to precinct-scale experimentation: embedding, framing, governing, and learning. We use the empirical illustration to discuss the relevance of these processes, refine findings from the literature review and conclude with a discussion on the implications of our article for future scholarship on urban planning by experiment at precinct scale.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document