Acquired von Willebrand syndrome secondary to lymphoproliferative disorders: A case series from two French centers

Author(s):  
Marie Haddad ◽  
Joris Voisin ◽  
Claire Reynes ◽  
Florence Blanc-Jouvan ◽  
Rémi Gressin ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2830-2830
Author(s):  
Ulrich Budde ◽  
Rita Dittmer ◽  
Sonja Schneppenheim ◽  
Tina Rausch

Abstract During the last 10 years our laboratory diagnosed and typed 5585 different patients with inherited von Willebrand disease (VWS) and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (aVWS). Out of these 21% (1217) suffered from aVWS. With 252 patients lymphoproliferative disorders were number three in frequency (21%) after cardiovascular (43%) and myeloproliferative (27%) disorders. Out of the patients with lymphoproliferative disorders patients with a monoclonal IgA protein comprised only 3.6% (9 patients). Much more abundant were monoclonal IgG´s (71%) and IgM´s (26%). According to our data only one patient was classified as MGUS and the others suffered from myeloma. The most impressive property was the heterogeneity of their laboratory and clinical data with the exception that all patients suffered from severe bleeding complications whenever their hemostatic system was challenged by accidents or invasive procedures (even iliac crest biopsy). The VWF:Ag ranged from 0.06 – 5.60 IU/ml and only one patient had a VWF:Ag <0.5 IU/dl. The functional test (VWF:CB) ranged from 0.06 and 5.48 IU/ml again with only one patient <0.5 IU/dl. The ratio VWF:CB / VWF:Ag was below 0.8 in three patients. Thus more than 50% of the patients would remain undetected if the VWF multimers were not included in the diagnostic panel. Two patients displayed the whole set of multimers, while the others showed a mild (5) or severe (2) absence of the large multimers. The hallmark of the multimic pattern from patients with an IgA monoclonal protein was the presence of a lot of smeary material within the electrophoretic lanes diplayed in all patients. In summary aVWS in the course of lymphoproliferative disorders and monoclonal IgA proteins is clinically severe, although probably not life threatening. It remains undetected with standard VWF tests and might be therefore not as rare as detected in our large patient panel. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1509-1509
Author(s):  
Jean Baptiste Rabec ◽  
Philippe Gautier ◽  
Xavier Troussard ◽  
Anne Claire Gac ◽  
Sylvain Chantepie ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction. Whereas von Willebrand disease is the most common constitutional bleeding disorder, acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is rare with an estimated prevalence between 0.04 to 0.5%(1). AVWS has been related in various pathophysiological conditions including cardiovascular diseases such as aortic stenosis, autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disorders. To our knowledge, the prevalence of AVWS in lymphoproliferative disorders has never been investigated. Methods. We conducted an observational monocentric prospective study in Caen university hospital to evaluate the incidence of AVWS in B cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD) and characterize its phenotype. Inclusion criteria were the presence of a BCLPD in patients with no personal or family history of bleeding. Every enrolled patients was tested for Biological parameters were measured including closure time, von Willebrand Antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and factor VIII procoagulant activity (FVIII:C). The bleeding phenotype was evaluated using Tossetto bleeding score(2). AVWS was suspected when patients presented a decrease of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo and/or a VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag below 0.7. Results. A total of 147 patients were included with the following diagnosis: fifty five patients (37%) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 48 patients (33%) with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS), 22 patients (15 %) with non hodgkin B cell lymphoma, 9 patients (6 %) with multiple myeloma, 4 patients (3 %) with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and 9 patients with other B-CLPD. Closure times, with epinephrine and ADP, were prolonged for six patients (6/147, 4.1%) with median levels of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII:C and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio at 29.5 IU/dL [9-284], 11.4 IU/dL [1-140] , 42.5 [6-204] and 0.3 [0.04-0.84], respectively. Five of these 6 patients had MGUS and 1 patient presented a follicular lymphoma. Serum protein electrophoresis revealed a monoclonal component in 5 patients with a median concentration at 8.45 g/L [4.4-9.1]. Four out of these 6 patients presented mucocutaneous bleedings including menorragia, ecchymoses, epistaxis, gingival bleedings, post-operative bleedings and gastro intestinal bleedings. The median bleeding score of these six patients was 4.5 [-1 – 12]. In four patients, the biological phenotype was a type 2 von Willebrand disease, with decreased VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio (<0.7), loss of high and intermediate molecular weight multimers and a decrease of von Willebrand binding to collagen (VWF:CB) (VWF:CB/VWF:Ag<0.6). Anti-von Willebrand factor inhibitor screening was negative for the six patients. Four of these 6 patients presented an accelerated clearance of VWF with increased von willebrand factor propeptide/VWF:Ag ratios. Table 1. Different proposed cutoffs with their prospective sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LR). Cutoff > Sensitivity % 95% CI Specificity % 95% CI LR + LR - 503.50 100.00 66.37% to 100.0% 0.30 0.007557% to 1.652% 1.00 0.00 2514.00 88.89 51.75% to 99.72% 75.22 70.24% to 79.76% 3.59 0.15 5020.00 77.78 39.99% to 97.19% 85.67 81.46% to 89.24% 5.43 0.26 Conclusion: In this original prospective study, we observed AVWS for 4.1% of patients with B-CLPD. Monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS) were associated with AVWS in 5 of 6 patients with AVWS. For patients with type 2 phenotypes, an increased clearance of VWF was the main mechanism of AVWS. The annual follow-up of these patients will give informations regarding the time of appearance and clinical informations for AVWS. Tiede A et al. Blood 2011. Tosetto A et al. Blood Rev 2007. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 2150-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Icheva ◽  
M. Nowak-Machen ◽  
U. Budde ◽  
K. Jaschonek ◽  
F. Neunhoeffer ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110017
Author(s):  
Johannes Kalbhenn ◽  
Hannah Glonnegger ◽  
Maya Wilke ◽  
Joachim Bansbach ◽  
Barbara Zieger

Background: Thromboembolism and bleeding contribute to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)’s morbidity and mortality and are also frequent complications of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO). As the interaction of the underlying pathologies caused by vvECMO in COVID-19 is barely understood, we designed this study to better differentiate coagulation disorders in COVID-19 patients before, during and after vvECMO-support. Methods: Observational case series, six consecutive patients with Coronavirus acute respiratory distress syndrome supported with vvECMO treated in the anaesthesiologic ICU in a third level University ECMO-centre. We measured routine coagulation parameters and assessed coagulation factors. We also conducted advanced von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis, platelet aggregometry and immunological screening. Results: We identified various phases of coagulation disorders: Initially, intensely activated coagulation with highly increased VWF and factor VIII activity in acute COVID-19, then severe acquired von Willebrand syndrome and platelet dysfunction during vvECMO leading to spontaneous bleeding and finally, hypercoagulopathy after vvECMO explantation. Five of six patients developed immunological abnormalities enhancing coagulation. Conclusions: Coronavirus-induced coagulopathy and bleeding disorders during vvECMO cannot be discriminated via ‘routine’ coagulation tests. Precise and specific analyses followed by the appropriate treatment of coagulation disorders may help us develop tailored therapeutic concepts to better manage the phases described above.


Haemophilia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. e361-e365
Author(s):  
T. Fidalgo ◽  
G. Ferreira ◽  
A. C. Oliveira ◽  
C. Silva Pinto ◽  
P. Martinho ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 900-904
Author(s):  
Christophe Nicol ◽  
Leela Raj ◽  
Gaëlle Guillerm ◽  
Francis Couturaud ◽  
Jean‐Richard Eveillard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document